RAGE

Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
Author
chicken27
Expert Angler
  • Total Posts : 763
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2007/10/21 09:02:45
  • Status: offline
2010/07/26 22:01:33 (permalink)

RAGE

I been thinking about making the switch but still worried about penetration.I know you shouldn't hit a shoulder blade but sometimes it happens.Will the rage break through a shoulder blade?I'm shooting a nex maxxis 302 fps and 362 grain st.axis arrow with hit insetrs equals 72.96 lb's of ke.
#1

54 Replies Related Threads

    MuskyMastr
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 3032
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2005/06/30 17:39:29
    • Location: Valley of the Crazy Woman
    • Status: offline
    RE: RAGE 2010/07/27 00:09:39 (permalink)
    I love the 2 blades, penetration is awesome. Video on the website actually shows better penetration with the threes, I just shoot the twos because some of the first generation mechanicals definitley had better penetration with the twos.

    I have seen rages shoot through the shoulder blade and not shoot through the shoulder blade. I think mostly it has to do with how close to the spine of the scapula you hit. Additionally, the the shoulder blade of a 1.5 YO is not nearly as heavily developed as that of an older deer.

    Rage leaves the best blood trails I have seen, and I look forward to shooting them out of my Dangerous Game Edition Maxxis 35 when it gets here this week.

    Better too far back, than too far forward.
    #2
    chicken27
    Expert Angler
    • Total Posts : 763
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2007/10/21 09:02:45
    • Status: offline
    RE: RAGE 2010/07/27 15:44:32 (permalink)
    Thanks musky so is the rage titanium a gimmick or what?
    #3
    Ironhed
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 1892
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2001/11/07 19:10:08
    • Status: offline
    RE: RAGE 2010/07/28 05:25:05 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: MuskyMastr

    I love the 2 blades, penetration is awesome. Video on the website actually shows better penetration with the threes, I just shoot the twos because some of the first generation mechanicals definitley had better penetration with the twos.

    I have seen rages shoot through the shoulder blade and not shoot through the shoulder blade. I think mostly it has to do with how close to the spine of the scapula you hit. Additionally, the the shoulder blade of a 1.5 YO is not nearly as heavily developed as that of an older deer.

    Rage leaves the best blood trails I have seen, and I look forward to shooting them out of my Dangerous Game Edition Maxxis 35 when it gets here this week.


    +10
    It was nice to meet ya last week, MM!

    27,
    I don't know if the titaniums are a gimmick or what but I'll let you know how they perform after I deflate a doe with one.
    I also bought the OSP CoreMax broadheads.  They fly very well. I now have big holes all through my target.  Now I wanna see what they do to a deer!

    Ironhed

    Blacktop Charters
    #4
    chicken27
    Expert Angler
    • Total Posts : 763
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2007/10/21 09:02:45
    • Status: offline
    RE: RAGE 2010/07/28 08:44:23 (permalink)
    I just watch the uncensored video on the rage they do put big holes in them.The only thing i didn't like is that almost every deer that was shot the arrow didn't even go through them.I understand that the deer they're shooting are 5 to 6 years old but must of the shots looked close but still not complete pass through.I just can't believe how bad they bleed even with just one hole in them.Everybody that i talked to about them loves them i'm just not a big fan on expandables but after watching the video all i can say is wow.I think i may buy a pack to shoot a doe with one to see what it does.
    #5
    eyeassassin
    Expert Angler
    • Total Posts : 847
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2010/05/19 22:32:21
    • Location: SW Pa
    • Status: offline
    RE: RAGE 2010/07/29 01:28:00 (permalink)
    at 35yds i had a two bladed rage bounce off of a doe. i shoot a pse pro series at 70lbs never seen anything like it. it just bounced off i must have been dead on the shoulder. i went back to fixed blade for this season. i never had one bounce off and always got full penetration. i am not blaming the rages just saying they are not for me

    REMEMBER HOW MUCH FUN YOUR FIRST BIG ONE WAS. TAKE A KID FISHING
    #6
    DanesDad
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 3087
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2005/03/21 15:35:43
    • Status: offline
    RE: RAGE 2010/07/29 02:53:11 (permalink)
    I'll find something with a little lower advertising budget. No offense to those who love em.
    #7
    chicken27
    Expert Angler
    • Total Posts : 763
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2007/10/21 09:02:45
    • Status: offline
    RE: RAGE 2010/07/29 20:30:37 (permalink)
    Ironhed why did you go with the core maxx over the saber maxx?How fast is your bow shooting?
    post edited by chicken27 - 2010/07/29 23:44:24
    #8
    tippecanoe
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 1451
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2008/08/13 08:40:51
    • Status: offline
    RE: RAGE 2010/08/09 09:16:42 (permalink)
    Love them.  Never had one go over 40 yards with a rage in them.  Have shot 3 bucks, all 2.5 year olds.  Longest shot was 45 yards, shortest was almost straight down.  With a 2+ inch gash slicing their heart/lungs to mush, they don't go far.
    #9
    MuskyMastr
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 3032
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2005/06/30 17:39:29
    • Location: Valley of the Crazy Woman
    • Status: offline
    RE: RAGE 2010/08/09 16:41:19 (permalink)
    Ironhed,

    Let me know what the penetration is like on those Core Maxx's

    Better too far back, than too far forward.
    #10
    Ironhed
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 1892
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2001/11/07 19:10:08
    • Status: offline
    RE: RAGE 2010/08/09 18:20:59 (permalink)
    Will do!

    Ironhed

    Blacktop Charters
    #11
    thedrake
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 1948
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2005/11/14 22:22:18
    • Status: offline
    RE: RAGE 2010/08/10 14:39:39 (permalink)
    I don't shoot rage heads, but a few of my close friends do. All of them love the rage 2 blades. I killed my last several deer with the G5 tekan, which is similar in design to the rage heads, but have a smaller cutting diameter. I can say it's impossible for one of these heads to enter a deer without opening completely. I imagine the same to be true with the rage 2 blade.
     
    I talked to 2 different guys at the local indoor range that each claimed they lost deer because the blades on the rage didn't open. That being said, after seeing both of these guys shoot, if either of them actually placed an arrow in the boiler room, it would be out of pure luck. I think all mechanicals can get a bad rap by guys who didn't place the arrow in the vitals, and then claimed the broadhead didn't open.
     
    #12
    SilverKype
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 3842
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2005/01/24 11:58:02
    • Location: State
    • Status: offline
    RE: RAGE 2010/08/10 15:17:05 (permalink)
    A rage 2 blade, broadside shot at 12 yards. The arrow didn't pass thru. I'm not sure the shot placement could get any better.




    My reports and advice are for everyone to enjoy, not just the paying customers.
    #13
    SilverKype
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 3842
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2005/01/24 11:58:02
    • Location: State
    • Status: offline
    RE: RAGE 2010/08/10 15:24:18 (permalink)
    Chicken - I drew where the shoulder blade is on the deer in red. Look how much space there is between the shoulder blade and behind the shoulder. Shoulder blades don't cover the shoulder.



    My reports and advice are for everyone to enjoy, not just the paying customers.
    #14
    fishin coyote
    Moderator
    • Total Posts : 1670
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2002/05/04 07:31:21
    • Status: offline
    RE: RAGE 2010/08/10 16:32:40 (permalink)
    Kype,
    What point are you trying to make?
    Looks like the head did it's job.
    Mike

    Nothing is Free!!
    Reward equals Effort


    #15
    Esox_Hunter
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 2393
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2006/08/02 14:32:57
    • Status: offline
    RE: RAGE 2010/08/10 16:48:37 (permalink)
    Additionally, where was the opposite shoulder positioned upon impact? What was the entry angle? Its just as hard to blow through the opposite shoulder as it is the near one

    post edited by Esox_Hunter - 2010/08/10 16:49:18
    #16
    SilverKype
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 3842
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2005/01/24 11:58:02
    • Location: State
    • Status: offline
    RE: RAGE 2010/08/10 18:03:26 (permalink)
    It did do its job, in this instance.  The deer went 30 yards.  Chicken asked about peneration.  A fixed blade would have passed completely thru and stuck into the ground.  And Randy knows it.   And that's why he said he was done with rage after that.  He's shot over 50 deer with fixed blades, and like others that hit the goody box and always get complete pass thru's, know that a fixed blade would have performed better.  Change this situation to an older deer, at 30 yards, and quartering away.  Questions may start to arise.  Large expanding blades create resistance.
     
    I already stated it was a broadside shot.  No shoulders involved.
     
     

    My reports and advice are for everyone to enjoy, not just the paying customers.
    #17
    Esox_Hunter
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 2393
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2006/08/02 14:32:57
    • Status: offline
    RE: RAGE 2010/08/10 19:13:50 (permalink)
    So the opposite leg wasn't positioned back on impact? Did it catch the leg bone perhaps?

    At any rate, 3 Rages fired and 3 pass throughs for me out of an average speed bow. Say what ya want, they work well for me.
    #18
    SilverKype
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 3842
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2005/01/24 11:58:02
    • Location: State
    • Status: offline
    RE: RAGE 2010/08/10 20:34:45 (permalink)
    The arrow simply didn't go thru.  There's nothing more to it.  No leg bones, no excuses.  A 40 pound bow puts a sharp fixed blade thru deer.  Watch the video chicken said he's concerned about.  The first shot by a Drury is a good shot yet he got 6-8 inch peneration.  The arrows even fall out of some of the animals when they take off.  Yes, the blood trails are good and that is at the the expense of peneration as seen.  They go back and watch their videos and let their deer go overnight sometimes on a perfectly placed shot.   And early season they are probably wasting deer meat to make a tv show of antler porn and broadhead promotion.   Yeah, that bothers me.  Some states & providences have deemed expandables illegal, others where only the rage 3 is, others where the cutting diameter can't be greater than 2 inches.  There's a reason for that, and it's not from my opinion.

    I'm not encouraging you or anyone to stop using what works for you.  I don't expect to change your mind.  I provided an example geared towards the question.  But it certainly is interesting that it's the expandable guys always defending their broadheads yet every 2-3 years, they are trying something new.

    The question ultimately is .. what advantage does expandables offer and what are the disadvantages of fixed blades.   In one sentence, the answer is that fixed blades distort the issues of an untuned bow and expandables cover those issues up, at the expense of performance.  It's a short-cut.  I take short-cuts too.. release, letoff, trail cams, etc..  but not at the expense a quick kill.  I hope they continue to work perfectly for everyone, but history says otherwise.
    post edited by SilverKype - 2010/08/10 21:52:23

    My reports and advice are for everyone to enjoy, not just the paying customers.
    #19
    Ironhed
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 1892
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2001/11/07 19:10:08
    • Status: offline
    RE: RAGE 2010/08/10 22:15:04 (permalink)
    But it certainly is interesting that it's the expandable guys always defending their broadheads yet every 2-3 years, they are trying something new.


    But yet your buddy took "...over 50 deer with fixed blades" and shot that one with a Rage.  Why did he switch?
    C'mon man, you gotta try something different once in a while!

    Sorry but move that left leg back an inch or three and he's clippin' the blade. 
    It's all hearsay anyway unless you were there.

    Ironhed

    Blacktop Charters
    #20
    SilverKype
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 3842
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2005/01/24 11:58:02
    • Location: State
    • Status: offline
    RE: RAGE 2010/08/10 22:37:30 (permalink)
    Yep, he tried something different because of all the hype.  First mechanical he's ever tried and now is right back where he was before.  
     
    And I was there.  I took the picture.  And I helped drag it out.  There were not marks on the legs.   I just saw two rages fly thru deer on tv.  wahoo !

    My reports and advice are for everyone to enjoy, not just the paying customers.
    #21
    thedrake
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 1948
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2005/11/14 22:22:18
    • Status: offline
    RE: RAGE 2010/08/10 23:23:45 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: SilverKype

    The arrow simply didn't go thru.  There's nothing more to it.  No leg bones, no excuses.  A 40 pound bow puts a sharp fixed blade thru deer.  Watch the video chicken said he's concerned about.  The first shot by a Drury is a good shot yet he got 6-8 inch peneration.  The arrows even fall out of some of the animals when they take off.  Yes, the blood trails are good and that is at the the expense of peneration as seen.  They go back and watch their videos and let their deer go overnight sometimes on a perfectly placed shot.   And early season they are probably wasting deer meat to make a tv show of antler porn and broadhead promotion.   Yeah, that bothers me.  Some states & providences have deemed expandables illegal, others where only the rage 3 is, others where the cutting diameter can't be greater than 2 inches.  There's a reason for that, and it's not from my opinion.

    I'm not encouraging you or anyone to stop using what works for you.  I don't expect to change your mind.  I provided an example geared towards the question.  But it certainly is interesting that it's the expandable guys always defending their broadheads yet every 2-3 years, they are trying something new.

    The question ultimately is .. what advantage does expandables offer and what are the disadvantages of fixed blades.   In one sentence, the answer is that fixed blades distort the issues of an untuned bow and expandables cover those issues up, at the expense of performance.  It's a short-cut.  I take short-cuts too.. release, letoff, trail cams, etc..  but not at the expense a quick kill.  I hope they continue to work perfectly for everyone, but history says otherwise.

     
     
    I'm one of those "expandable guys" who change their broadheads every 2-3 years. The reason is no more than I like to try new gear. It's just the same as when I buy new fly rods every so often, it has nothing to do with the older rods not working well, it's just a matter of trying something new for the heck of it. Assuming people switch to different mechanicals because the old ones didn't work is a poor assumption.
     
    I've lost count of how many deer I've killed with mechanical heads. I've only ever had one shot that didnt pass through the deer. It was a quartering away shot, that hit the far shoulder. The broadhead was poking out the far side, but the entire shaft didn't pass through. That was the only time it's ever happened. I did in fact, have the same experience years ago with a fixed blade.
     
    As far as the rage heads go, I haven't tried them. I get good pass throughs and quick kills with a 1.5" cutting diameter mechanical. I don't see a need to go bigger.
     
    About shortcutting... My bow shoots bullet holes through paper. Correct me if I am wrong, but I would consider a paper tuned bow, to be tuned. I screwed a friends steelforce broadhead into one of my arrows the other day just to see how it shot from my bow. The impact over and over at 20 yards was in the same spot about 3" off my point of aim. If I choose to shoot them this coming season, I would have to sight my bow in to shoot just those heads. That means when I screw field points on to shoot 3D after sighting in for broadheads, I'd have to adjust my sights back to where they were. I'd rather not do that. With all the mechanicals I've shot, no adjustments are needed. I don't have to resight my bow every time I want to switch back and forth from broadheads to field points. I don't believe this is unreasonable. It's not a case where my arrows are fish tailing like crazy, and the only way I could get a broadhead to shoot straight is to use a mechanical.
     
    I'd go on, but it's getting late, and the trout will be rising early. Time for bed.
    #22
    SilverKype
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 3842
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2005/01/24 11:58:02
    • Location: State
    • Status: offline
    RE: RAGE 2010/08/10 23:34:48 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: thedrake

    ORIGINAL: SilverKype

    The arrow simply didn't go thru.  There's nothing more to it.  No leg bones, no excuses.  A 40 pound bow puts a sharp fixed blade thru deer.  Watch the video chicken said he's concerned about.  The first shot by a Drury is a good shot yet he got 6-8 inch peneration.  The arrows even fall out of some of the animals when they take off.  Yes, the blood trails are good and that is at the the expense of peneration as seen.  They go back and watch their videos and let their deer go overnight sometimes on a perfectly placed shot.   And early season they are probably wasting deer meat to make a tv show of antler porn and broadhead promotion.   Yeah, that bothers me.  Some states & providences have deemed expandables illegal, others where only the rage 3 is, others where the cutting diameter can't be greater than 2 inches.  There's a reason for that, and it's not from my opinion.

    I'm not encouraging you or anyone to stop using what works for you.  I don't expect to change your mind.  I provided an example geared towards the question.  But it certainly is interesting that it's the expandable guys always defending their broadheads yet every 2-3 years, they are trying something new.

    The question ultimately is .. what advantage does expandables offer and what are the disadvantages of fixed blades.   In one sentence, the answer is that fixed blades distort the issues of an untuned bow and expandables cover those issues up, at the expense of performance.  It's a short-cut.  I take short-cuts too.. release, letoff, trail cams, etc..  but not at the expense a quick kill.  I hope they continue to work perfectly for everyone, but history says otherwise.



    I'm one of those "expandable guys" who change their broadheads every 2-3 years. The reason is no more than I like to try new gear. It's just the same as when I buy new fly rods every so often, it has nothing to do with the older rods not working well, it's just a matter of trying something new for the heck of it. Assuming people switch to different mechanicals because the old ones didn't work is a poor assumption.

    I've lost count of how many deer I've killed with mechanical heads. I've only ever had one shot that didnt pass through the deer. It was a quartering away shot, that hit the far shoulder. The broadhead was poking out the far side, but the entire shaft didn't pass through. That was the only time it's ever happened. I did in fact, have the same experience years ago with a fixed blade.

    As far as the rage heads go, I haven't tried them. I get good pass throughs and quick kills with a 1.5" cutting diameter mechanical. I don't see a need to go bigger.

    About shortcutting... My bow shoots bullet holes through paper. Correct me if I am wrong, but I would consider a paper tuned bow, to be tuned. I screwed a friends steelforce broadhead into one of my arrows the other day just to see how it shot from my bow. The impact over and over at 20 yards was in the same spot about 3" off my point of aim. If I choose to shoot them this coming season, I would have to sight my bow in to shoot just those heads. That means when I screw field points on to shoot 3D after sighting in for broadheads, I'd have to adjust my sights back to where they were. I'd rather not do that. With all the mechanicals I've shot, no adjustments are needed. I don't have to resight my bow every time I want to switch back and forth from broadheads to field points. I don't believe this is unreasonable. It's not a case where my arrows are fish tailing like crazy, and the only way I could get a broadhead to shoot straight is to use a mechanical.

    I'd go on, but it's getting late, and the trout will be rising early. Time for bed.

     
    No really, it's not a poor assumption when infact people get poor performance on a product and switch because of it.   You're real quick to jump to the conclusion that switching is only because of trying new things for the heck of it.

    My reports and advice are for everyone to enjoy, not just the paying customers.
    #23
    SilverKype
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 3842
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2005/01/24 11:58:02
    • Location: State
    • Status: offline
    RE: RAGE 2010/08/11 08:02:24 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: Ironhed

    But it certainly is interesting that it's the expandable guys always defending their broadheads yet every 2-3 years, they are trying something new.


    But yet your buddy took "...over 50 deer with fixed blades" and shot that one with a Rage.  Why did he switch?
    C'mon man, you gotta try something different once in a while!

    Sorry but move that left leg back an inch or three and he's clippin' the blade. 
    It's all hearsay anyway unless you were there.

    Ironhed



    Don't forget to mention that you are shooting 80 some pounds and MM is shooting 90 or so. If I was chicken, I'd want to know that.

    It would be along the same parallels as me picking up the fastest fly rod on the market, overlining it, and when someone asks about it, telling them it's not that fast without the rest of the story. Shooting that kind of poundage is an exception.


    Which also begs the question, why do you shoot that poundage ? Why does anyone shoot over 50 pounds ? Probably all the same reasons; performance.

    My reports and advice are for everyone to enjoy, not just the paying customers.
    #24
    fishin coyote
    Moderator
    • Total Posts : 1670
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2002/05/04 07:31:21
    • Status: offline
    RE: RAGE 2010/08/11 09:26:55 (permalink)
    Well then let's ask this ?

    Why do we have to have pass throughs on every shot, and if not why is it considered bad?

    I shoot fixed blades and have since 1978 when I started. I may switch to mech. this season just to try them out but I'm old school

    The only time a pass through is needed in my opinion is when you have high hits from steep angles that tree stand hunters seem to get because they think they need to climb to the heavens to kill a deer.
    On any low hit (angle or from the ground)it is not going to make a difference. In fact if they run off with a SHARP head in them its going to do more damage as it bounces around in the boiler room.
    Mike

    Nothing is Free!!
    Reward equals Effort


    #25
    Esox_Hunter
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 2393
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2006/08/02 14:32:57
    • Status: offline
    RE: RAGE 2010/08/11 09:35:56 (permalink)
    No really, it's not a poor assumption when infact people get poor performance on a product and switch because of it. You're real quick to jump to the conclusion that switching is only because of trying new things for the heck of it.


    And somehow it isn't a bad assumption to make that all hunters switched broadheads because of poor performance on previous heads they have used?

    Think of it this way; how many archers will fess up to making a bad shot? How many will tell you that they made a "perfect" shot and never recovered the deer due to a broadhead? You have got to be pretty naive about the things you hear, especially considering I would be suprised if 25% of the archers I know knew what tuning a bow even was.

    I used to shoot Rocket Sidewinders and took a number of deer with them with no major issues and had all pass throughs with the exception of one that hit the opposite shoulder blade. My only complaint with them was that they weren't as durable as I would have liked. I switched to Rages based on the reviews I had heard from some guys in my area, I ain't looking back now.
    #26
    SilverKype
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 3842
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2005/01/24 11:58:02
    • Location: State
    • Status: offline
    RE: RAGE 2010/08/11 09:46:47 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: fishin coyote

    Well then let's ask this ?

    Why do we have to have pass throughs on every shot, and if not why is it considered bad?

    I shoot fixed blades and have since 1978 when I started. I may switch to mech. this season just to try them out but I'm old school

    The only time a pass through is needed in my opinion is when you have high hits from steep angles that tree stand hunters seem to get because they think they need to climb to the heavens to kill a deer.
    On any low hit (angle or from the ground)it is not going to make a difference. In fact if they run off with a SHARP head in them its going to do more damage as it bounces around in the boiler room.
    Mike


    I didn't say we have to have pass thrus. The above situation is proof that mechancials don't match the performance of fixed.

    My reports and advice are for everyone to enjoy, not just the paying customers.
    #27
    SilverKype
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 3842
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2005/01/24 11:58:02
    • Location: State
    • Status: offline
    RE: RAGE 2010/08/11 09:59:37 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: Esox_Hunter

    No really, it's not a poor assumption when infact people get poor performance on a product and switch because of it. You're real quick to jump to the conclusion that switching is only because of trying new things for the heck of it.


    And somehow it isn't a bad assumption to make that all hunters switched broadheads because of poor performance on previous heads they have used?

    Think of it this way; how many archers will fess up to making a bad shot? How many will tell you that they made a "perfect" shot and never recovered the deer due to a broadhead? You have got to be pretty naive about the things you hear, especially considering I would be suprised if 25% of the archers I know knew what tuning a bow even was.

    I used to shoot Rocket Sidewinders and took a number of deer with them with no major issues and had all pass throughs with the exception of one that hit the opposite shoulder blade. My only complaint with them was that they weren't as durable as I would have liked. I switched to Rages based on the reviews I had heard from some guys in my area, I ain't looking back now.


    I did not use the word all. I did say always defending. If you want to play the manipulation game, we can go there.

    Some archers do fess up. Others blame the broadheads. Others say it's "always" the shot placement and that is not correct. Like I said, there's a reason they aren't legal is some states & providences and a reason some outfitters won't allow hunters to use them.

    And thanks for admitting you switched from sidewinders because of performance. Proved my point in which you were questioning. Which begs the question.. what good are large expanding blades once they hit ribs and bend to all hell. Less effective for sure.



    My reports and advice are for everyone to enjoy, not just the paying customers.
    #28
    SilverKype
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 3842
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2005/01/24 11:58:02
    • Location: State
    • Status: offline
    RE: RAGE 2010/08/11 10:12:21 (permalink)
    I couldn't help but wonder last night when the shwacker commerical came on tv and did a demo on quartering shots on a piece of plywood. That demo certainly didn't transpire from a history of maximum performance.


    My reports and advice are for everyone to enjoy, not just the paying customers.
    #29
    fishin coyote
    Moderator
    • Total Posts : 1670
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2002/05/04 07:31:21
    • Status: offline
    RE: RAGE 2010/08/11 10:17:38 (permalink)
    Jon,

    "I didn't say we have to have pass thrus. The above situation is proof that mechancials don't match the performance of fixed."

    How can the above situation be proof that mechs. don't match fixed in performance. ??????
    The deer is DEAD AND RECOVERED is it not?
    Mike

    Nothing is Free!!
    Reward equals Effort


    #30
    Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
    Jump to: