spoonchucker
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 8561
- Reward points: 0
- Status: offline
Would you rather catch?
Do you fish for the catch, or the challenge?
post edited by spoonchucker - 2007/04/12 14:42:14
Get Informed, Get Involved, And Make A Difference. Step Up, or Step Aside The next time you say "Somebody should do something", remember that YOU are somebody. GL
|
Stillhead
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 1887
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2003/12/19 23:03:01
- Status: offline
RE: Would you rather catch?
2007/04/12 15:01:58
(permalink)
That's a trick question. Sometimes I want a challenge, so a few fish is ok. If I'm fishing for meat, I want the basketfull. Allot of times, the toughest challenge of them all, is fishing for a basket full of meat. I fish to fish and have fun. It's kind of like the "why do you fish" question you get on occassion. The only good answer I can think of, "if you have to ask, then you wouldn't understand anyway".
|
Grendel
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 1675
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2001/10/30 21:39:21
- Location: Between Heaven and Hell
- Status: offline
RE: Would you rather catch?
2007/04/12 15:04:13
(permalink)
All the fish, all the time; regardless of where they are. Doc
post edited by Grendel - 2007/04/12 15:05:14
The strength of a person isn't measured by the muscle in their arm or how tall they stand, but rather, by the amount of knowledge and area of versatility they can cover. CM ~ 1987 Not a fan of Burgh teams. Get over it...
|
Stillhead
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 1887
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2003/12/19 23:03:01
- Status: offline
RE: Would you rather catch?
2007/04/12 15:07:20
(permalink)
Hey did you change the poll, or did I not see the "depends on species" choice the first time. I demand a recount.
|
spoonchucker
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 8561
- Reward points: 0
- Status: offline
RE: Would you rather catch?
2007/04/12 15:07:41
(permalink)
Yeah. I suspect that the last option would come out the winner. I like the challenge, but I also like to be successful in the challenge.
Get Informed, Get Involved, And Make A Difference. Step Up, or Step Aside The next time you say "Somebody should do something", remember that YOU are somebody. GL
|
Storm Warning 2
Expert Angler
- Total Posts : 583
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2005/09/23 14:12:01
- Status: offline
RE: Would you rather catch?
2007/04/12 15:49:16
(permalink)
A rod bending, reel screaming, chaos creating KING!
|
steelydaze
Expert Angler
- Total Posts : 376
- Reward points: 0
- Status: offline
RE: Would you rather catch?
2007/04/12 16:40:54
(permalink)
If that one fish is a state record then one. Really Im fine with a couple fish, just out to have a good time.
|
Bughawk
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 3247
- Reward points: 0
- Status: offline
RE: Would you rather catch?
2007/04/12 16:46:32
(permalink)
I guess I was suckered into the last option, depends on the species. If there are a ton of bluegills around, I want to catch a ton of them.... When it come to steelies, all I want to catch is one and I am happy. I don't even really need to land it, just hook up and play the fish for awhile. If it spits the hook, that is fine with me. Less of pain having to remove the hook... When it comes to muskie, if I land a few per season, I am happy.
post edited by Bughawk - 2007/04/12 16:47:17
|
ShutUpNFish
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 3834
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2007/03/16 10:31:34
- Status: offline
RE: Would you rather catch?
2007/04/12 16:58:07
(permalink)
It really has to depend on the species. I do, however love a challunge. Thats primarily why I chose muskie fishing years ago. But I have to admit...the first time I hooked into one of them bad boys and it came toward me with its gills flared, shaking its head on the surface and looking like he wanted to eat my boat, really kinda got me addicted. What a rush!
|
pafisher
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 3000
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2002/08/15 11:14:30
- Status: offline
RE: Would you rather catch?
2007/04/12 17:57:20
(permalink)
Any trout or Salmon will do as long as it's LARGE!But,my favorite is a Coho fresh out of Lake Ontario into the Salmon River in the fall.
|
tippy-toe
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 4334
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2005/11/21 13:20:12
- Location: under a rock
- Status: offline
RE: Would you rather catch?
2007/04/12 18:00:30
(permalink)
I like the challenge of seeing a single trout sipping flies and trying to fool him into a take......nothing better
I have the right to remain silent.....I just don't have the ability
|
indsguiz
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 6356
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2005/03/24 01:59:54
- Status: offline
RE: Would you rather catch?
2007/04/12 21:20:42
(permalink)
Spoon, For me it would have to be a few fish. I rarely keep anything I catch except perch & walleye, and then only enough for a meal (for 30). I'd rather spend a day on a brookie creek and fool 5-6 natives into taking a surface fly . With steelhead, 4-5 a day is great. With pelletheads, 40-60 a day caught & released is good. What I really like to do is wander the creeks on opening day and find a kid/kids who aren't having much luck and <if possible> get them in to some fish on a fly rod. The excitment on a kids' face when they get a fish on a fly rod is priceless. Bass all C&R, Muskie C&R, Smallies C&R. The only way I would keep a fish is if it were a wall hanger. (Trophy)
Illegitimis Non carborundum
|
genieman77
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 2534
- Reward points: 0
- Status: offline
RE: Would you rather catch?
2007/04/12 23:19:54
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: spoonchucker Do you fish for the catch, or the challenge? Yes ..L.T.A.
|