Lake Erie Tributary Permit 2014....

This should be the NEW stamp incorporated in 2014..
Elk.....Walnut..... 20 mile...... 16 mile...  Each stream has its own EXCLUSIVE PERMIT. Charge $250 for the year long permit and the money supports stream improvements, land easements, law enforcement, stockings for that stream..  All other tributaries will fall under the current Lake Erie stamp.  All tresspass fees shall go to that streams finances..

another useless post by topdog.. wouldnt expect any less or more

So what happens to all the people who can't just dish out 250 every year? Plus Erie would be losing money from revenue in tournism and the one time up angler. The 250 amount would just be rediculous. Whats next stock stripped bass?

So by paying one of the highest costing licenses in the country and being a Erie resident my whole life I would have to pay a steep fee to fish? Granted I normally don't fish those creeks often anymore I want to enjoy my fishing, but its just rediculous. It would never happen, when Erie would lose millions in revenue for fishing.

I pay every year 37.80, therefore I do get to fish. It would be the worst decision the fish commission has ever made by far, they would lose so much money they would have to charge even more.

Yea then after they do all this they should put in restrooms by the stream that you have to pay to get into. Why do you think fishing has to be a rich man sport? It's supposed to be a past time and something to do with your friends and family. I'm not an old guy by any means but I still have deep roots with tradition and pastime and paying 250 dollars to fish a few streams is just stupid. If you feel like giving out extra money how about you pm so I can tell you my address on where to mail the check!

Plus steeltrouts stink anywayz

Molson just had 1 to many Molson today.

Imagine the revenue they would have coming in if they implemented a Troll permit.

I'll take my chances without it thank you!!!!!
what a BAG.......

why are you people taking this **** seriously. This man thrives on conflict which is why he started this ridiculous thread. Hes an **** ignore him and he'll go away

You would "reduce crowding" by "bringing back" people who aren't there now?
 
Reduce crowding, to attract more people
 
Brilliant. Why didn't I thunk of that

Then go up there, I'm sure they would love your money. Erie has thrived on allowing the unexperienced angler to come up and catch fish. Plus if you don't like the crowds you shouldn't be fishing those creeks regardless. There are reasons to why they put so many fish in those creeks. The point is this is a pointless discussion and it will never happen. I can guarentee there are hardly enough DIEHARD guys for those creeks to make it worthwhile

I thought it was a Certain Fact that there would be less people on the streams judging by the whining in this thread.  Didnt think it needed to be stated.  I guess I over estimated you guys, sorry...

I heard they were going to alleviate the pressure on Erie by stocking Marlin in the 3 rivers...  Any truth to that??