Helpful ReplyTHEYRE HERE PART 2

Page: < 1234 > Showing page 3 of 4
Author
Clint S
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 3706
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2011/04/17 20:18:35
  • Status: offline
Re:THEYRE HERE PART 2 2012/09/13 06:56:14 (permalink)
Bob  my guess would be the is far less water in the SR than the lake and it can only hold so much O2 match, in low water and warm and his year isworse.  With more water = more volume  = more water coming over rocks = more holding capacity.  
As far as natural fish coming in every year.  Fish are going to do with mother nature programmed them to do not what is best to do.   We get only half the fish from the hatchery.   Take away lot of the natural spawning and take away half the fish.  
 

The gods do not deduct from man's allotted span the hours spent in fishing.  ~Babylonian Proverb

#61
dimebrite
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 3207
  • Reward points: 0
  • Status: offline
Re:THEYRE HERE PART 2 2012/09/13 07:06:43 (permalink)
Well i hope everyone enjoys their planned trips in the upcoming weeks. Just checked the ten day on wunderground.com and next mid week is looking like some classic salmon weather. I am very interested to see iwhat next week's wind events will give us mid week...could be another good one...
There is a whole other wall of fish out in the lake. This is by no means the mother load. Clint, i imagine there is a mass of fish chopped up between clamshed and ace in the hole...most likely holed up throughout the deeper pools. At the same time dsr should still be packed tosay. I havent picked up the rod since monday afternoon...i may pick it up tho s evening, but then again ive kinda neen enjoying the spectators point of view
#62
dimebrite
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 3207
  • Reward points: 0
  • Status: offline
Re:THEYRE HERE PART 2 2012/09/13 07:15:06 (permalink)
As for the wild spawners... i dont think theres need to sweat it either...last year was the return for 2007's fish which was a draught year...i dont about anyone else, but i saw plenty of wild fish last year...tight lines guys
#63
hot tuna
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 6388
  • Reward points: 0
  • Status: offline
Re:THEYRE HERE PART 2 2012/09/13 11:33:34 (permalink)
Well the greed over runs the need.
LFZ will remain closed.
But what do I know about a fishery.

P.S.
Keeping the lfz closed is totally a B.S.
move as it does nothing to protect the fish . They must first get there.
If the dec of ny had any balls it would close the lower first half of the river, thus allowing the maximum chance for return while keeping a balance with fishers.
Obviously there is a need to take fish out of the system so that's why the above would work.

Second :
While I refer to this like 07 , I also said in other ways it's different.
Main thing is water temps.
In 07 while the levels were low and drought conditions existed , the water temps were low enough to sustain the fish, now they are not.
Again reason why db pointed out that there was natural spawning .
It's not just about flow, it more so about o2 levels and water temps.

Good luck up there and once again , get em' while their hot
post edited by hot tuna - 2012/09/13 12:55:24

"whats that smell like fish oh baby" .. J. Kaukonen
#64
twobob
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 1674
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2012/08/21 06:47:10
  • Status: offline
Re:THEYRE HERE PART 2 2012/09/13 15:32:08 (permalink)
so then it has nothing to do with too many fish depleteing the o2.
the salmon river at this temp does not hold enough o2 for a salmon to survive?
the water coming out of the dam and flowing downstream doesn't carry enough o2 for a salmon to survuive at 70 degrees?
thanks knowing that i don't see how it matters if i get lucky enough to ride a few around the river, even if they can't be revived they could live in such low o2 levels anyways.
my conscience is clear.
 what difference does a couple of hours mean if they weren't going to survive to spawn anyways.
#65
retired guy
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 3107
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2010/08/26 15:49:55
  • Location: ct-vacation place in Richland
  • Status: offline
Re:THEYRE HERE PART 2 2012/09/13 15:38:14 (permalink)
My pea brain is at work again---
  Hey - dont recall exactly what dates the big flood was coupla years ago but do recall dropping everything and running up to check on my place- No fishing- not my cupa tea with those levels.
  As I went from place to place on the river for a few days just lurking I saw that there were large numbers of Kings everywhere running up the sides. I mean a LOT of fish. An ya couldnt see what was running otherwise cause of the muddy waters and depth.
   Now,  I know as well as the next guy that the high cooler water made them run like that but also that they more or less hadda be staged to get in and up so quickly. It too was  a huge number of early fish.
  Hmmmmm - just wonderin what it mighta been like  without the flood.  Could it possibly be that this was NOT the first hugest run ever this time of year ???
post edited by retired guy - 2012/09/13 15:43:34
#66
hot tuna
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 6388
  • Reward points: 0
  • Status: offline
Re:THEYRE HERE PART 2 2012/09/13 15:43:13 (permalink)
Well that's what I get for reading the Internet . Seems it was posted on another site from a local that the lfz was to remain closed.
Thanks to good friend jack he contacted the dec directly .
As of now the lfz will open on 15 th as planed.
My appologies for mis information
post edited by hot tuna - 2012/09/13 15:45:30

"whats that smell like fish oh baby" .. J. Kaukonen
#67
retired guy
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 3107
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2010/08/26 15:49:55
  • Location: ct-vacation place in Richland
  • Status: offline
Re:THEYRE HERE PART 2 2012/09/13 15:46:07 (permalink)
Too bad- I  would agree that the Zones might well stay closed till they see whats gonna happen. Probably be OK if the levels stay at least where they are now but if it gets lowered those that make it to the Zones are a major part of the future.
post edited by retired guy - 2012/09/13 15:47:50
#68
dimebrite
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 3207
  • Reward points: 0
  • Status: offline
Re:THEYRE HERE PART 2 2012/09/13 20:13:03 (permalink)
Last i heard the lfz is remaining closed..i hope it does as there are more than a few fish up there...water temps are not too bad. Actually at rt. 3 bridge right now and still fish jumping
#69
retired guy
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 3107
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2010/08/26 15:49:55
  • Location: ct-vacation place in Richland
  • Status: offline
Re:THEYRE HERE PART 2 2012/09/13 20:40:18 (permalink)
    Probably be up later next week= Work being done on my place late in the week and wanna  be around.
    If its down to 100 dont even know if I'd bother fishing= perhaps some secluded larger pool or run but the heart wont be in it too much. Might get depressed stumbling over deads.
  Gonna draw a big pentagram in the back yard- get naked- kill a chicken-do a dance- and sing for rain.
  Dont come around- will be an awful sight.     Its worked before though.
post edited by retired guy - 2012/09/13 21:05:06
#70
Clint S
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 3706
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2011/04/17 20:18:35
  • Status: offline
Re:THEYRE HERE PART 2 2012/09/13 21:13:13 (permalink)
It is official it WILL remain closed.  They are keeping the upper open.   Base flows will  remain at 185
http://www.dec.ny.gov/outdoor/9218.html
post edited by Clint S - 2012/09/13 21:14:15

The gods do not deduct from man's allotted span the hours spent in fishing.  ~Babylonian Proverb

#71
Lucky13
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 1949
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2002/10/26 04:40:48
  • Status: offline
Re:THEYRE HERE PART 2 2012/09/14 07:34:24 (permalink)
I don't know but maybe the skeins ripen at differential rates so that there is room for all the little potential salmmies.  Not a fish Physiologist, however!
 
L13
#72
hot tuna
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 6388
  • Reward points: 0
  • Status: offline
Re:THEYRE HERE PART 2 2012/09/14 07:39:51 (permalink)
One would have to explain the reasoning about closing the farthest upper section of the river which is a c&r as opposed to keeping the lower open.

Yes you may see fish in the lfz but as was in 07 the issue was not enough were returning to the hatchery for egg take.
So please someone explain the theory to this dumb fisher.

Now don't get me wrong that I want to see a business get shut down because for most all my salmon years that was the only place I fished for them so my opinion is NOT biased in any way.

"whats that smell like fish oh baby" .. J. Kaukonen
#73
Lucky13
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 1949
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2002/10/26 04:40:48
  • Status: offline
Re:THEYRE HERE PART 2 2012/09/14 08:21:19 (permalink)
DEC Website still shows LFZ not opening on 9/15, and closed until Halloween.  I think they are just trying to prevent the massive dieoff that occurs from repeatedly "walking" those dogs, keep the air pollution down in Altmar! LOL!
 
L13
#74
dimebrite
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 3207
  • Reward points: 0
  • Status: offline
Re:THEYRE HERE PART 2 2012/09/14 08:35:00 (permalink)
Tuna, if i remember correctly in 07 chinooks did not even make it up there at all. If flows stay at 185 they will make it up there as they already are. Beaver dam brook inlet is basically a stones throw away feom the lfz...i think it would ensure fish to get to the hatchery if it remains closed...and as lucky thirteen said, the sog walking would get out of hand there. The fish that i observed above the rt. Fifty two bridge and in the church hole yesterday appeared to be healthy and sustainable... id prefer to see them kept that way. On the other hand i havent fished since monday
#75
hot tuna
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 6388
  • Reward points: 0
  • Status: offline
Re:THEYRE HERE PART 2 2012/09/14 10:31:28 (permalink)
Disagree , fish did make in 07 just not in enough numbers needed.
So your sayin there are already enough ?
I guess the theory then is to walk them around in the lower river ( hope they don't float) like they were in 07 down there and then let them rest in the lfz.

Sorry I must be just like dumb mud shark and not bittng on that

"whats that smell like fish oh baby" .. J. Kaukonen
#76
dimebrite
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 3207
  • Reward points: 0
  • Status: offline
Re:THEYRE HERE PART 2 2012/09/14 10:46:21 (permalink)
Never said there is enough. But there are some and more coming... and given the conditions i think it would benefit the fishery if they were given a chance to rest there rather than being hooked evry 10 minutes...

Based on your theory that im interpreting, it sounds like the whole river should be closed... not putting words in your mouth...just telling you how im interpretting what you are typing... why should the lfz stay open if the rest of the river is closed??? Makes no sense to me.

At this point im just gonna keep watching when i can...because no arguement or opinion is going to change mother nature ;)
#77
pafisher
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 3000
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2002/08/15 11:14:30
  • Status: offline
Re:THEYRE HERE PART 2 2012/09/14 11:22:43 (permalink)
Close it from 2A down to the mouth,that's where the major snagging and bloodletting occurs.Then the fish get a head start on there way to the hatchery and there is still plenty of river left for all to fish.Think Barkley would go for that?
#78
dimebrite
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 3207
  • Reward points: 0
  • Status: offline
Re:THEYRE HERE PART 2 2012/09/14 11:39:15 (permalink)
Just got a text message from a guide friend of mine...hes saying theyre running down in dsr harder than hes ever seen...im talking a guy with 30+ years experience....this is 5 days straight of unbelievable constant ffish movement. As said, i havent fished since monday evening for only a couple hours...i guess my observations of just watching these fish run are considered dishonest shame on me
post edited by dimebrite - 2012/09/14 11:43:11
#79
hot tuna
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 6388
  • Reward points: 0
  • Status: offline
Re:THEYRE HERE PART 2 2012/09/14 13:05:22 (permalink)
Never typed close the river. I totally understand the need to have an amount removed . If you read my posts correctly , I only asked a half of the river be closed in order to balance the fishery and the fishermen. And that would be the bottom to the middle river . As said ensured fish the reach the upper

"whats that smell like fish oh baby" .. J. Kaukonen
#80
hot tuna
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 6388
  • Reward points: 0
  • Status: offline
Re:THEYRE HERE PART 2 2012/09/14 13:26:18 (permalink)
Andrew: brother your reading too much into this.
All I am saying is the dec is once again dropping the ball on protecting the fishery. Isn't that what we all want , a common goal ?
Honestly I could care less about the lfz . Keep it closed really don't matter to me.
But as a concerned fisher and anyone with some balls to go against the establishment with open eyes would realize, you start from the bottom up .

I do not think your dishonest at all.

"whats that smell like fish oh baby" .. J. Kaukonen
#81
retired guy
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 3107
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2010/08/26 15:49:55
  • Location: ct-vacation place in Richland
  • Status: offline
Re:THEYRE HERE PART 2 2012/09/14 13:31:52 (permalink)
Guess I'm kinda missing a point or two here.
     Enlightenment please--
    While I agree that too many fish is unusual and some should  be removed from the system by dying or being harvested I really dont get the low river closing argument to protect them all-- not that they will do it anyhow.
 Every year some come into the River and are played with way low and released or attacked -even in low numbers -some also die naturally. Folks here do that every year. The hatchery still gets fish.
  With so many more fish now it might seem that a similar or even larger than normal percentage will get through to the Hatchery and Zones- In fact they are already arriving up there.
  Actually 185 or so is rather normal flow this time of year with the  exception of the  once a  month or so release for the Yak folks. Cancelled this year.
 I have never heard such a 'low river' protection argument when fish numbers were much lower which might seem  more appropriate. Just the opposite in fact with good DSR reports being kinda normal from regulars in Sept.
  Remember these seem to be primarily WILD fish and we have yet to see the stocked fish in good numbers- The runs will continue.  
   Also water temps are perhaps a bit cooler most years but certainly still nowhere near the needed Spawn temps.
  I understand low water closing arguments for the lfz so the fish that make it can not be played to death and overly stressed.
  I may add that it was great to see that fish are moving up and there seems to (as yet) be no indication of a feared 02 issue to any overly significant degree.
post edited by retired guy - 2012/09/14 13:49:37
#82
hot tuna
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 6388
  • Reward points: 0
  • Status: offline
Re:THEYRE HERE PART 2 2012/09/14 14:06:14 (permalink)
Rt , your wrong . In 07 the hatchery did not get their quota.
If you close the lower half it allows fish to freel un molested ( like now) to move into the upper half.
That would ensure an upper river of fish and a better chance for the hatchery to meet quota.

By keeping a lower river open and closing the last section does nothing to ensure this.
Anyone with an open eye can see what's happening right now.
Fish are being stressed to exhaustion in the lower river.
They are being trapped, herded and picked off well before they make mid river.
I'm mean do you really not see that ? Or is the Internet reports showing something different.
Why are so many people targeting them down river as opposed to mid & upper.

Have at it

P.s.
Look at a true wild salmon river system
That's exactly what happens in Alaska
post edited by hot tuna - 2012/09/14 14:14:14

"whats that smell like fish oh baby" .. J. Kaukonen
#83
fichy
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 1899
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2011/06/15 16:12:51
  • Status: offline
Re:THEYRE HERE PART 2 2012/09/14 14:16:47 (permalink)
Dissolved oxygen (DO)  is a huge component in fish survival. There's alot of factors involved in a succesful run, enough DO would be one of them. Dissolved oxygen is not O2 . They are actually microscopic gas bubbles of oxygen released through gas diffusion and absorbed by a fishs' gills. So much for the science.  Nitpickin' BS on my part....The reality is some precautions should be taken, but it may be a good thing to have a smaller run to contain the balance of forage/predators in the lake. It may very well be the  under-developed skiens are from  overpopulation stress on the salmon. Nature will create a balance whether we like it or not. I may go up to do battle with a couple if I can.  They are pretty spectacular fish. I just got back from an incredible wilderness  trip and caught trout beyond count, but I still would find it difficult to turn down a shot at  huge bendos from some sharks. Glad to see the run happening and I hope all of us can make the best of it. Thanks for the discussion, guys. I always learn alot. Doesn't surprise me, despite disagreements,  the tone is staying civil.  Hope I catch some of you guys on the river- hopefully not with my backcast. lol.
 
Charlie
#84
retired guy
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 3107
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2010/08/26 15:49:55
  • Location: ct-vacation place in Richland
  • Status: offline
Re:THEYRE HERE PART 2 2012/09/14 14:28:25 (permalink)
Nice to have ya back Charlie- glad you had a good Trip.
  Tuna -will agree to dis agree- Hey didnt the level go to 100 for quite a while back in 07.-if it did that here and now i would agree to shut down the hole thing till it came back up. 185- they will make it up-  also there is still a lot more time and more runs left in the season. Pray for rain.
#85
pafisher
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 3000
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2002/08/15 11:14:30
  • Status: offline
Re:THEYRE HERE PART 2 2012/09/14 15:04:28 (permalink)
From what I recall of the disaster of 2007 they did lower it to 100 for a time,lets hope they don't do that now.Forecast is for rain tonight and then tuesday,but it won't change water levels.
#86
twobob
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 1674
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2012/08/21 06:47:10
  • Status: offline
Re:THEYRE HERE PART 2 2012/09/14 15:21:22 (permalink)
was the run as big in 07?
i have seen videos showing fish side by side 3-5 abreast as far up and downstream as the camera panned.
was it like that in 07?
my understanding is that the fish never made it to the upper river in any numbers in 07 not that they died from lack of do.
it seems that there are so many fish runnung this year that they are already in the upper river in some numbers.
a lodge owner in altmar reports pods of thirty to sixty fish blowing past the pineville bridge with some frequency.
did that happen at this point of the run in 07?
again i don;t understand why the water coming from the dam isn't replentishing the do in the river.
as retired guy asked enlightenment please.
#87
dimebrite
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 3207
  • Reward points: 0
  • Status: offline
Re:THEYRE HERE PART 2 2012/09/14 15:32:21 (permalink)
Twobob, the run was nowheres near as big in 07...id almost be inclined to say that more fish have entered the river this year at this point than the total of 07...07 had some great coho runs in mass amounts and they were quite prominent in the lfz in mid october when the lfz was closed...believe what your hearing...this is incredible and theres still a wall of fish out on the lake...

Fichy, good to hear from you... my brother fished all day tuesday and wednesday with no weight on a 13 foot spey rod and had a blast... and it seems as if its still going on. You would have a blast if you were up. Its been a while since i started a thread here and im quite happy to see the different opinions and views being tossed around and at the same time it seems as if some new guys are chiming in and learning.... hope everyone has a blast

Tuna, i think we're both reading in to it a little much buddy...maybe its time for a little mellow mood buddy
#88
hot tuna
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 6388
  • Reward points: 0
  • Status: offline
Re:THEYRE HERE PART 2 2012/09/14 16:00:26 (permalink)
Agree db.
I will rest my case and hope for the best in our fishery future. At this point .
My bad about o2 vs do .
Charlie glad to see your back.

"whats that smell like fish oh baby" .. J. Kaukonen
#89
twobob
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 1674
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2012/08/21 06:47:10
  • Status: offline
Re:THEYRE HERE PART 2 2012/09/14 16:58:15 (permalink)
wait before you rest your case explain to me why the water coming out of the dam isn't replenishing the o2 or d o levels so as it would seem from 3fan and others are saying the hundreds or thousands of these salmon that have made it past pineville  and in some cases into the altmar area?
there are no huge wads of fish upstream to deplete the d o2 level so why won't the fish survive?
stressing them i understand but fish are making it into a closed area with more everyday
once there why will they die?
how many does the hatchery need?
#90
Page: < 1234 > Showing page 3 of 4
Jump to: