As near as I have seen the only people that do support Evelands rants are those that have no knowledge of the deer/habitat relationships and/or simply choose to believe in conspiracies where clearly none exist.

Really? lmao.

.

Yikes and I thought the upcoming thread about antlerless allocations was going to be the next big debate.

ORIGINAL: wayne c

I believe they are much more representative of the majority of hunters than you are.

No, we are talking about HUNTERS. Not bird watchers. HUNTERS. You know, the ones that you said should be forced to take smart pills, and you wished they would all take their funding money and take a flying leap? Given that, im not too sure youre the man to ask about "hunters" and their views chief.

So whether they are hunters, conservationists or environmentalists, I would much rather have them speaking for the future of hunting than guys like you.

And I have no doubt that you are tickled pink that that actually is our current reality.

 
I assure you I am a very avid hunter and also have great respect for hunters who become knowledgeable about the way hunting REALLY fits into and benefits the future of both our resources and hunting.
 
I have no respect for people who choose to remain ignorant of the realities of the natural interactions and relationships though, whether they are hunters or people from any other walk of life. Unfortunately some hunters are more harmful to the future of both hunting and our wildlife resources than any anti-hunt I have ever encountered.
 
R.S. Bodenhorn