LockedBe Chris Rosenberry for a year

Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
Author
Guest
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 2852
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2012/05/17 08:04:02
  • Status: online
2011/12/15 09:24:19 (permalink)

Be Chris Rosenberry for a year

So in the "WMU 2B" thread in general hunting discussion, worm_waster threw out a couple of ideas for revamping the deer management plan. It's apparent many of us would like to see some changes - whether it's going back to the good ol' days or making some tweaks to the current plan.

So, you're in Chris Rosenberry's position for a year. Rather than continually criticize the PGC, what proactive changes would you implement to the current deer plan?

Here are suggestions I'd make:

1. Issue 2 deer tags with every license sold. One antlered only tag. One antlerless only tag. Good statewide in every season - archery, muzzleloader, and general firearms season. Keep seasons the same as they are now, except make the general firearms season a state-wide split except in special regs units. First week Monday through Friday, bucks only. Saturday through Saturday, either sex.

2. Eliminate the junior/senior antlerless season in October.

3. Eliminate the open antlerless season with any weapon in 2B after the general firearms season. Don't know the situation in the eastern special regs areas, so I'll take input from my "experts."

3. Similar to what w_w suggested in the other thread, issue bonus/DMAP tags on a WMU or property by property basis. In special regs areas, the PGC could issue bonus doe tags and allow property owners to issue DMAP tags. In non-special regs WMU's, property owners can offer DMAP tags and the PGC could issue bonus tags for use on public/game lands only.

4. Establish mandatory reporting (internet, phone or good old fashioned snail mail) for successful and non-successful deer hunters. Give hunters until March 1 to report. No report by March 1 = no deer tags for the following year.

Tear those ideas apart or feel free to add your own.
#1

41 Replies Related Threads

    bingsbaits
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 5052
    • Reward points: 0
    • Status: offline
    RE: Be Chris Rosenberry for a year 2011/12/15 14:44:17 (permalink)
    1. Doe tags $20. You can only buy 4 max. No person can kill more than 5 deer.

    2. Eliminate the junior/senior antlerless season in October.

    3. Mandatory reporting, phone or computer, you have two weeks after the close of the season you participated in. You don't report you will be denied a tag the next year.

    4. Split season, first week buck only statewide. Second week either sex.

    5. Hunting license cost tied to the rate of inflation, with the increases comingevery five years.

    6. All private land in Penna is posted private property w/out the landowners permission.

    7. WCO's enforce the Trespassing laws if the violaters are hunting.

    8. No mentoured youth license, They can take the test at age 9 and buy a junior license. At least they would have some formal safety training before shooting at game.

    9. A new strategic plan to map out the migration routes of the nomadic Whitetail Deer in Penna.
    post edited by bingsbaits - 2011/12/15 14:46:41


    No amount of evidence will ever persuade an idiot... Mark Twain
     
     


    #2
    worm_waster
    Expert Angler
    • Total Posts : 528
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2003/08/23 10:29:10
    • Location: Home: Fairview/Away:Sinnemahoning
    • Status: offline
    RE: Be Chris Rosenberry for a year 2011/12/15 15:52:59 (permalink)
    rsquared,
     
    I believe that an either sex tag is better for keeping the antlerless harvest low in areas that don't need it and making up the difference with DMAP.  For instance, if anyone in 2G hunts has a doe tag, there would be more tags used there than now.  I realise that is not the case in many other units, but 2F and 1B would be similar.  I honestly believe that since we send for doe tags so early, many casual hunters don't think about it until it is too late.
     
    I would keep the jr/sr. antlerless seasons.  There has been no fatalities that I am aware of since the season started several years ago.  To make the October woods safer, the PGC would be wiser to bann the use of treestands.  There have been several fatalities directly linked to treestands as well as 100's of injuries over the last few years.
     
    Keep the season after Christmas for DMAP areas anywhere in the State.
     
    Mandatory reporting is fine with me. 
     
    Bings,
     
    I am fine with raising the doe tag to $10.70 (same price that DMAPS are now).  $20 is a bit high IMO.  The hunters shooting the doe are doing the managment of the herd, while strictly buck hunters are doing very little for the general public (Who unfortunately the PGC also works for).
     
    WCO enforcing tresspass laws while hunting is a good idea.
     
    I'm good with Jr hunters starting at 9 with Hunter Ed.
     
    Not sure about the migration thing.  I do know that 4 deer migrated north to our freezer...but not sure about the rest of the herd.w_w.

    If it has fins and gills, I'm there.

    #3
    wayne c
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 3473
    • Reward points: 0
    • Status: offline
    RE: Be Chris Rosenberry for a year 2011/12/15 16:02:00 (permalink)
    #1 thing I would do is get rid of the "vegetation based" management experiment, the likes of which no other states has implemented. Its nothing but a failing experiment, the design if flawed and there is absolutely no way to implement it effectively on a widescale statewide basis. Absolutely impossible. You simply cant, for example, look at 20 small plots across an area of 2000square miles and expect it to represent much of anything! And, the goal itself is far too vague, open to interpretaion and ones individual values.

    Given that, I would implement reasonable, proven, deer density goals per unit. Perhaps overwinter goals of say 10 or 12 for the very worst areas, and say, 28-30 for the best. (exact numbers to be negotiated, just examples) With everywhere else falling somewhere in between as necessary at 15, 20, 25 etc... And from there, set the allocations to meet the goals, and adjust as needed. If with reasonable proven densities, forest health isnt as desired, then it would point to other issues other than deer that need to be addressed.

    #2 smaller units.

    Im sure I could come up with quite a few, but those i can come up with very quickly. Those particularly number one are those that i deem by far the most important.
    post edited by wayne c - 2011/12/15 16:06:21
    #4
    Claypool313
    Expert Angler
    • Total Posts : 449
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2007/07/28 15:17:11
    • Status: offline
    RE: Be Chris Rosenberry for a year 2011/12/15 18:02:19 (permalink)
    If I was Chris Rosenberry, the first thing I'd do is punch myself in the nads.


    I don't think he has the authority to do a lot of the things I'd like to see.  Here's my wish list anyway, even though it's a pipe dream.

    1.  Some sort of mandatory deer harvest reporting system.
    2.  Eliminate bonus tags.  Once first round is over, no matter how many sold, that's it.  Everyone who wanted a tag got one.  Except for heavy suburban areas keep same plan, but see #3.
    3.  Shrink WMU's, even if it means splitting counties, to keep the habitat / land specs even throughout.
    4.  Archery October - Jan or at least let it run to 11/15 regardless of how the Saturdays fall.
    5.  Bear archery 10/15 - 11/15.  Let us hunt them when the natural food is actually available.
    6.  Amend the Constitution to never allow inlines in flintlock, before it's too late.
    7.  No more back tags.  I know it's enacted, but I've been saying this for years.
    8.  Optional orange for archers and turkey hunters on private land.
    9.  Sundays.  Freedom to choose.
    10.  Spring gobbler starts 1 week earlier.
    11.  The last one would be about crossbows, but I don't want to offend my x-gun shooting friends.
    post edited by Claypool313 - 2011/12/15 19:04:33
    #5
    Dr. Trout
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 4417
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2002/03/03 03:12:33
    • Location: Jefferson County (2F)
    • Status: offline
    RE: Be Chris Rosenberry for a year 2011/12/15 20:12:41 (permalink)
    The very FIRST THING I would do ===


    #1... I would want to know how many and WHO have applied after deer seasons start for a duplicate license because they lost theirs... how many have done it more than once in the past 4-5 years ??
    we had several (3) at the hardware again this year... I also had to tell 2 OTHER people they had to go the county treasurer to get another doe tag for the one they "LOST" during last week .... Had it for week one, but lost it during week two ... had the regular license just lost the "doe tag"

    If we had 3 lost "buck tags" I wonder how many Wal Mart in DuBois had... ??
    I wonder how many lost antlerless tags the county treasurer issued ??

    #2 ... we also had folks getting DMAP tags after they filled their 2F or 2G tags... stop selling deer licenses during the rifle season .. just like they do for bear season... buy the tags before the season starts or you do not get one....


    #3... same for coming in day 4 or 5 of rifle season and buying one for the son, daughter, brother or wife... had those too...

    SORRY === but I suspect most of those were folks trying to get extra deer....
    post edited by Dr. Trout - 2011/12/15 20:14:35
    #6
    bingsbaits
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 5052
    • Reward points: 0
    • Status: offline
    RE: Be Chris Rosenberry for a year 2011/12/15 20:18:11 (permalink)
    All speculation on your part.

    Why sullt the reputation of hunters if you do not have the facts...


    No amount of evidence will ever persuade an idiot... Mark Twain
     
     


    #7
    Dr. Trout
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 4417
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2002/03/03 03:12:33
    • Location: Jefferson County (2F)
    • Status: offline
    RE: Be Chris Rosenberry for a year 2011/12/15 20:45:04 (permalink)
    All speculation on your part.


    What I posted is FACT that's what we had .. now if you want to believe all those folks lost licenses.. so be it.. I can't change that...

    but I deal with people every day and talk and listen... how do you think I even found out years ago folks were claiming they lost their licesne so they can shoot another deer ?????

    As the one said .. "if the WCO did not see the deer before I cut it up... he has no idea if I shot a deer or lost the license" ....

    I did not post it for just you and your opinions, many will read that and see what I see...CHEATS !!!

    guys trying to take advantge of a situation that they can get away with....

    I have NO problem INSULTING guys that would do what I discribed and sorry.. that many folks did not lose there licenses...

    It will be VERY interesting to see what happens next year when the excuse "I must have got it torn off going thru the thicket" goes away... next year they can be in your pocket safe from being lost ...

    My money is on there will still be "lost" licenses....
    #8
    S-10
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 5185
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2005/01/21 21:22:55
    • Status: offline
    RE: Be Chris Rosenberry for a year 2011/12/15 20:58:24 (permalink)
    I've lost three licenses in the course of my hunting career. My wife has also decided to deer hunt during season at least twice where she bought her license after season started. Does that make me a goon, thug, slob, road hunter, or just an all around not nice guy. It happens, I'am sure some of the other also happens.
    #9
    Dr. Trout
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 4417
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2002/03/03 03:12:33
    • Location: Jefferson County (2F)
    • Status: offline
    RE: Be Chris Rosenberry for a year 2011/12/15 21:14:13 (permalink)
    I'am sure some of the other also happens.



    and that was the point I was trying to make...

    sure there are truly lost licenses .. but just how many are not lost but an attempt at an extra deer...

    You have lost 3 .. I have lost NONE in 50 years of hunting.. so that proves nothing....

    you must know no one who cheats the license system... sorry .. but I do know some. so again proves nothing but that it does happen...

    my idea would prevent some of that from happening.. just the point I was trying to make

    so they fact your wife decided late to hunt.. too bad ... by not being able to buy after the season starts it would cut out alot of cheating ... and save a few deer for next year
    #10
    bingsbaits
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 5052
    • Reward points: 0
    • Status: offline
    RE: Be Chris Rosenberry for a year 2011/12/15 21:32:06 (permalink)
    As a person who sells the licenses and suspects foul play, did you call your WCO hotline.

    If not why??

    You have a suspected game violation and do nothing, but beech on here about the dishonest liars, goons, thugs and all around slob hunters of this state. How many of those suspected license cheats did you turn in ???


    Or just speculation again.....


    No amount of evidence will ever persuade an idiot... Mark Twain
     
     


    #11
    SilverKype
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 3842
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2005/01/24 11:58:02
    • Location: State
    • Status: offline
    RE: Be Chris Rosenberry for a year 2011/12/15 22:31:09 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: bingsbaits

    9. A new strategic plan to map out the migration routes of the nomadic Whitetail Deer in Penna.

     
    Great !    This one is gonna go on for a long time.   Trout will probably leave a few times in the process!

    My reports and advice are for everyone to enjoy, not just the paying customers.
    #12
    Guest
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 2852
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2012/05/17 08:04:02
    • Status: online
    RE: Be Chris Rosenberry for a year 2011/12/16 09:44:23 (permalink)
    Back to the topic . . .

    w_w I would not eliminate the Oct. doe season as a matter of safety concern. I would eliminate any "special" seasons or regulations for certain segments of the hunting population. And I have 3 kids, so it's not like I have no interest in special seasons. Eliminate the Oct. muzzleloader doe season as well.

    If we're going to do AR, make it for everybody, including juniors, military and seniors. I'm kind of ambivalent about AR. I haven't seen much impact where I hunt in 2B or in 2D (very heavy agricultural area with excellent habitat and food). I could take it or leave it, but if we're going to have it, have it for everybody.

    Unrelated to deer, but along the same lines, I'd eliminate the youth only pheasant and duck weekends as well. If kids are going to get into hunting, do it like we all did when we were kids.

    I like Bings' idea of eliminating the mentored hunt but lowering the age for HTE and full inclusion in hunting. Like the idea of FORMAL training for all hunters. Age 9 or 10 seems about right.

    I'd keep current season structures the same: archery from Oct. 1 - Nov. 15 (roughly); general firearms season; muzzleloader/late archery. No inlines.

    #13
    sstuffy
    Avid Angler
    • Total Posts : 104
    • Reward points: 0
    • Status: offline
    RE: Be Chris Rosenberry for a year 2011/12/16 14:37:38 (permalink)
    i agree with having bucks only the first week then doe hunting the second week it would definetly let the herd build back up after a few years and i strongly disagree with inlines in the traditional muzzleloader season those things are just like a high powered rifle and its not about shooting deer at 150 yards in that season
    #14
    mr.crappie
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 2549
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2002/09/05 21:51:29
    • Status: offline
    RE: Be Chris Rosenberry for a year 2011/12/16 21:01:55 (permalink)
    I don't think they should eliminate the October muzzle loader season, because I think that was the only good thing about the changes to the deer season,because 1= if you are going to shoot does you may as well shoot them early, to save that much extra food that they will eat before getting shot in Dec., 2= less does available during the rut will cause the Bucks to compete harder for the ones that are left, resulting in more buck activity.Also the milder weather in Oct. makes it more appealing for the younger & older hunters possibly keeping them in the sport longer. sam
    post edited by mr.crappie - 2011/12/16 21:02:54
    #15
    mohawksyd
    Expert Angler
    • Total Posts : 854
    • Reward points: 0
    • Status: offline
    RE: Be Chris Rosenberry for a year 2011/12/17 02:06:38 (permalink)
    1. Keep the split buck/doe season statewide.
    2. Two deer max. One buck, one antlerless, or two anterless.
    3. One deer per day.
    4. Make anterless tags available OTC with your other tags.
    5. Once the deadline has passed for antlerless licenses, that's it. You either got one or you didn't.
    6. Abandon the MYHP and keep the minimum age 12. Tired of hearing how little Timmy had a spelling test so Dad filled his tag for him.
    7. I like mandatory reporting matched with the denial of privileges the following year for noncompliance.
    8. Universal, statewide ARs. If we're going to have them, they should be applicable to all hunters in all locations.
    9. Put bear back to Mon-Wed so I don't have to listen to Big Ed eat, snore, or bust azz for an extra day.
    10. Reinstitute the "random checkpoints" of the late 70's/early 80's and really crack down on poaching.
    11. Adult licenses start at 18, not 17.

    "For the supreme test of a fisherman is not how many fish he has caught...but what he has caught when he has caught no fish." - John H. Bradley

    #16
    Claypool313
    Expert Angler
    • Total Posts : 449
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2007/07/28 15:17:11
    • Status: offline
    RE: Be Chris Rosenberry for a year 2011/12/17 07:44:08 (permalink)
    9. Put bear back to Mon-Wed so I don't have to listen to Big Ed eat, snore, or bust azz for an extra day.



    I don't know who Big Ed is, but that made me laugh.


    I have to agree with the folks who like the Oct muzzleloader season.  It's perfect for me.  After surveying the local doe population, (mostly via trail cams), I assess if it's healthy enough to lose a breeder.  Last few years it has been, so the early muz gives me an opportunity to put meat in the freezer, w/o worrying about shooting a doe while buck hunting.  And like others have said, you get your doe before it's bred.  In my area it's far from a sure thing so there's enough challenge in it for me to feel rewarded.
    #17
    mr.crappie
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 2549
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2002/09/05 21:51:29
    • Status: offline
    RE: Be Chris Rosenberry for a year 2011/12/17 10:21:41 (permalink)
    Although I do not trespass, I do not support the idea of WCOs enforcing trespass laws on posted property.Those laws are civil laws & should be enforced by either the State Police or local civil law enforcers. WCOs are Game Code officers & are vastly understaffed the way it is, IMO. I don't see why we should pay thier salary to help landowners that don't want us on thier propertry. If the L.O. want help I believe that they can join one of the PGC public access program & get it. btw By keeping the Oct. doe season intact I am sure that there are a lot less deer killed on the highway during the rut. sam
    #18
    bingsbaits
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 5052
    • Reward points: 0
    • Status: offline
    RE: Be Chris Rosenberry for a year 2011/12/17 11:15:15 (permalink)
    I think if they are "hunting", Trespassing should be addressed by the WCO's.

    I would rather the incident be handled as Trespassing hunters by WCO's than calling the State Police and tell them there are three armed men walking across my yard.

    Yes they are spread to thin.

    #10. Hire more officers.


    No amount of evidence will ever persuade an idiot... Mark Twain
     
     


    #19
    mr.crappie
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 2549
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2002/09/05 21:51:29
    • Status: offline
    RE: Be Chris Rosenberry for a year 2011/12/17 13:00:48 (permalink)
    In that scenario, which agency do you think would get there first? sam
    #20
    bingsbaits
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 5052
    • Reward points: 0
    • Status: offline
    RE: Be Chris Rosenberry for a year 2011/12/17 13:53:11 (permalink)
    You might be right there..


    No amount of evidence will ever persuade an idiot... Mark Twain
     
     


    #21
    retired guy
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 3107
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2010/08/26 15:49:55
    • Location: ct-vacation place in Richland
    • Status: offline
    RE: Be Chris Rosenberry for a year 2011/12/17 14:04:23 (permalink)
       If your law is like ours it says that to be a legal hunter you must have permission from the landowner (here in writing on a state form) otherwise--POACHER.
      I have had several properties over the yeas where I have had to perform chores in order to maintain my written permission- during the season others have tried to come in and hunt alongside me- POACHERS-GONZO
    The trespass goes right along with the game laws intent for owner permission and it would seem most appropriate for your game officials to take action as well as any other LE.
       The only 'issue' is wether or not the landowner will nut up and be the complaintent with other le for simple trespass . With no written permission slip the Game officer is already in a position to move as that in and of itself is a Game violation here.
         Of course other le can take action on that premis as well but they dont generally get too involved in game violations without first calling in  a Game officer anyhow
    Skip the middle man and go right to Game folks..
    post edited by retired guy - 2011/12/17 14:51:20
    #22
    mr.crappie
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 2549
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2002/09/05 21:51:29
    • Status: offline
    RE: Be Chris Rosenberry for a year 2011/12/17 17:49:49 (permalink)
    Our trespass laws are NOT like yours or the same as in other states that I have hunted, in where trespass laws are indeed civil laws & are enforced by people charged to enforce them.Being ,I believe that Penna. is either the only one or one of a few States that have seperate enforcement agencys.I think that a law would have to be passed giving the PGC power to enforce trespass laws. Where would it stop? Some people cry now that the PGC has too much power.
    #23
    DarDys
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 4958
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2009/11/13 08:46:21
    • Location: Duncansville, PA
    • Status: offline
    RE: Be Chris Rosenberry for a year 2011/12/19 09:43:44 (permalink)
    Okay, I'll give this a whack.  Please keep in mind that this is an outside-of-the-PGC view that would/could possibly change based on information that the PGC has that I am not privy to.

    I.  REPORTING
             a. Mandatory for all PA license holders
             b. Positive harvest, negative harvest, did-not-hunt
             c. Must report positive within five days of harvest (kill, whatever)
             d. Must report negative or did not hunt within five days of close of season
                  i. Did not hunt can report anytime, but must report within five days of the last season they hold tags for
                  ii. Archery tag holders must report within five days of the end of archery season
                          (see SEASONS heading for new archery season)
                  iii. Muzzleloader tag holders must report within five days of the end of muzzleloader season
                  iv. Firearms hunters with no other tags must report within five days of the end of  the firearms season
             e.       Reporting done by phone or online only
                  i. Suggest online reporting so a valid receipt is available
                  ii. Mandatory penalties for non-reporting
                                1. Loss of hunting license purchase ability for three years
                                2. Fine in lieu of purchase ability for first offense
                                         a. POS will be flagged if a report was not filed
                                         b. License paper will print out with the following instructions to use to rectify the situation
                                           i. Provide the printed report receipt in order to prove a system error                            
                                                     ii.Pay a $250 fine in addition to the cost of the purchased license (first offense only)                                                                                                                                  
     
                                                     iii. Loss of hunting license purchase ability for three years for first offense, five years                                              for second offense, and lifetime for third offense
              f.       PGC must provide first draft reports within ten days of close of season
                                       i. Report must be in Excel so that it can be downloaded and sorted by anyone wishing to do so (data cells will be locked)
                                        ii. All report data date, sex, points per side, township, weapon, etc. will be included in other words, if it gets reported, the data is available (might add public/private just for fun)
                                        iii. Only actual reports used – no formulas, no guestimates, no fudge factors
                                                 iv. As each season closes, the master report tab will be updated

    II.      SEASONS
              a. Archery Season will run from September 1 to January 15 (Sundays inclusive) – no split season
              b. Firearms season (any weapon season really) will run from December 1 to December 15 (Sundays inclusive)
              c. Muzzleloader Season will run December 15 to February 1 (Sundays inclusive)
                    i. Any muzzleloader is applicable (Sorry the traditional muzzleloader season [which I loved and actively participated in BTW] in PA ceased to be traditional when conical bullets with plastic power belts and ballistic tips could replace patched, round balls; preformed Pyrodex pellets could replace loose, measured black powder, and fiber optics could replace iron open sights)
             d. All other seasons are removed (see DATA USE heading for problem areas)
             e. All seasons will be either sex seasons – no split seasons (while I am sure that the antlerless deer I took on the first legal day to do so appreciated the fact that it got to live from Monday to Saturday because of the split season, there was no valid management purpose for it, said same for the last Saturday harvest)

    III.  BAG LIMITS
              a. Antler Restrictions are removed and revert back to three inch or better spikes or two points to a side - let hunters decide whether to take a buck or pass
              b. A buck tag comes with the general license
              c. Antlerless tags will be allocated based on new, smaller WMUs (see WMU heading)
              d.Hunters must have a valid tag to hunt (in other words, a muzzleloader hunter must have a valid buck tag or a valid antlerless tag in addition to their muzzleloader license - just like an archery hunter must - and can only take an antlerless deer in the WMU they have a valid antlerless tag for or a buck with their buck tag - no more antlerless with a general license tag)
            e. Hunters can fill their valid tags in any way possible with respect to harvests per day (in other words, if they want to fill all of their tags from a single group of deer [example, buck and doe in group, hunter can harvest both back-to-back if they have the valid tags] so be it – no need to tag before subsequent harvests

    IV. YOUTHS
            a. Youths must have a valid license to hunt – no more mentored hunts
            b. To purchase a valid license a youth must pass the hunter’s safety course
                  i. No lower age limit to take the course - if they can pass it at age five they get a license, if they cannot pass it at age 25 they donot
           c.Youths with a valid license under the age of 12 must hunt in accordance with the current mentor safety rules - mentor must carry weapon, proximity to mentor, etc.
         d. Youths 12 to 16 follow current junior safety rules
         e. 17 or older follow current adult safety rules

    V. WMUs
         a. WMUs will be reduced to county size or smaller (see DATA USE heading)
         b. WMUs will be used for wildlife management, not to make easy boundaries for law enforcement - animals donot care what side of a major road, waterway, or landmark they are killed (harvested, whatever) on

    VI. DATA USE
         a. Antlerless allocations will be frozen at present levels for two years in order to collect accurate, real number harvest data
         b. Real number harvest data will be used to determine new, smaller WMUs
                i. The first size reduction will be to county size
                ii. Township data will be used to determine if even smaller units are needed
                                1. WMUs could be as small as individual townships if the data warrants it, but never larger than individual counties
         c. Based on real number harvest data, antlerless allocations will be reduced in overharvested WMU areas by 50% for a minimum of two years and can only increase by 10%  for year number three if the data shows an increase is necessary with the new allocation being required to be in place for two years before another change can be made, increase in allocations or decrease in allocations, with all subsequent changes restricted to 10%
         d. Based on real number harvest data, antlerless allocations in underharvested WMU areas will remain the same, but an earn-a-buck program will be instituted in order to encourage antlerless harvests
               i. Under the earn-a-buck program, the license holder can harvest a buck with their general back tag like any other hunter
               ii. When a hunter harvests an antlerless deer in an earn-a-buck WMU, they are issued an earn-a-buck antlered tag for that particular WMU and can harvest another buck
        e. Based on real number harvest data, season length can be adjusted in underharvested WMU areas to provide additional time to reach the desired harvest levels
        f. No changes can be made any more rapidly than the third year following the previous change in order to smooth the cyclic nature of the data and no increase or decreases can be greater than 10%
     
     
    NOTE:  Sorry, for some reason the formatting of the outline that I cut and pasted didn't translate well.  I tried to fix it as best I could, but I apologize fore any confusion from the areas I could not.
    post edited by DarDys - 2011/12/19 10:09:09

    The poster formally known as Duncsdad

    Everything I say can be fully substantiated by my own opinion.
    #24
    bingsbaits
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 5052
    • Reward points: 0
    • Status: offline
    RE: Be Chris Rosenberry for a year 2011/12/19 10:11:35 (permalink)
    You need a job on the BOC.
    I like your thinking..


    No amount of evidence will ever persuade an idiot... Mark Twain
     
     


    #25
    DarDys
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 4958
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2009/11/13 08:46:21
    • Location: Duncansville, PA
    • Status: offline
    RE: Be Chris Rosenberry for a year 2011/12/19 10:15:30 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: bingsbaits

    You need a job on the BOC.
    I like your thinking..

     
    When the one in my district was open -- they didn't like my thinking.

    The poster formally known as Duncsdad

    Everything I say can be fully substantiated by my own opinion.
    #26
    retired guy
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 3107
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2010/08/26 15:49:55
    • Location: ct-vacation place in Richland
    • Status: offline
    RE: Be Chris Rosenberry for a year 2011/12/19 12:41:05 (permalink)
    Mr Crappie-
    The point I was trying to make was that if your state did what ct does and required a hunter to carry written permission to hunt a property it would NOT be a trespass complaint but a violation of the game statute if said hunter did NOT carry such permission. Would clear up a real lot of the issues brought forth commonly here.
    No fine line there on trespass-clear violation of the game statute-ct has a printable page in the yearly book of rules and regs that has the required permission slip to be carried at all times while hunting any property.It is an annual requirement to be dated and signed each year by both the hunter and the landowner or leasee.
    There is therefore no need for LE to run around and try and find any owner or leasee- the simple fact is that if ya dont carry and present that form- PINCH. No different than not carrying a lisence -just one of those things you MUST have in your possesion while hunting by virtue of the game laws.
    post edited by retired guy - 2011/12/19 13:33:07
    #27
    wayne c
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 3473
    • Reward points: 0
    • Status: offline
    RE: Be Chris Rosenberry for a year 2011/12/19 13:36:43 (permalink)
    The point I was trying to make was that if your state did what ct does and required to hunter to carry written permission to hunt a property it would NOT be a trespass complaint but a violation of the game statute if said hunter did NOT carry such permission. Would clear up a real lot of the issues brought forth commonly here.


    And create others. A huge inconvenience for both landowner and hunter. Its tough enough already to gain permission without landowners needing to sign a percieved "contract". Having dealt with plenty of landowners through the years, I see it as simply begging more land to be posted because of some not wanting the "bother". And hunters who already are unhappy about enough things, having even harder times obtaining places to hunt. Some who dont particularly like to have to beg strangers for permission as it is, might just up and quit as opposed to going around with paperwork for folks to sign!
    post edited by wayne c - 2011/12/19 13:37:38
    #28
    S-10
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 5185
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2005/01/21 21:22:55
    • Status: offline
    RE: Be Chris Rosenberry for a year 2011/12/19 14:05:24 (permalink)
    That was one thing I found in Ohio. If you pounded on enough doors and wern't dressed in camo at the time, you could usually gain permission to hunt. I never got permission from a landowner that was willing to sign one of the States permission slips. It got so I quit even discussing it. They said I could hunt and I did. I don't know why they didn't trust the slips(maybe they did percieve it as a contract) but they didn't, and all I really cared was for them to say it was ok.
    #29
    retired guy
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 3107
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2010/08/26 15:49:55
    • Location: ct-vacation place in Richland
    • Status: offline
    RE: Be Chris Rosenberry for a year 2011/12/19 14:40:10 (permalink)
    Wayne and 10-
      You are both quite correct. Around here we call the weeks prior to Hunting Season - the begging season- thats when ya gotta go around to the owners and hope for permission again this year.
        It is clearly the downside to the issue. Many say "awww just go hunt its OK with me" but will NOT sign. If you just go hunt and LE checks you---PINCH. Gotta carry the permission on the slip in writing or you are in clear violation of the law. Can make it really tough-frankly if I wasnt LE myself woulda been tempted to just hunt with the verbal over the years.
        Oddly enough most will readily give permission to bow hunt in writing- guess its cause they think ya wont kill anything anyhow and nobody will hear ya shooting. Have often moved this up to muzzel as well after a coupla years of bow hunting.
       On the flip side when ya do get permission anyone sneaking in is a violator easily addresed by LE.
      Bad and inconvenient as it can be -just cant imajgne a 'wild west' scenario where without  permission others can just barge in on pvt property and nobody can do much about it.
    different strokes-----
      One of the really tough things I have come across in recent years is permission on 'the right properties'. As Farming has suffered a huge decline and many forests are maturing to a canopy with little underbrush finding properties having decent DPSM number is getting harder and much more competitive. From what I read here you PA folks may be having the same issues.
    post edited by retired guy - 2011/12/19 14:57:11
    #30
    Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
    Jump to: