Salmon

Page: < 12345.. > >> Showing page 3 of 6
Author
salmotrutta
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 2132
  • Reward points: 0
  • Status: offline
RE: Salmon 2011/08/22 08:02:39 (permalink)
Yeah- like I told that yahoo who stopped in last week- the site owners have maps with the fishing spots on them, and how to fish them so...
The spot burning thing is more of a small creek thing that will be cleaned out if someone blabs about it via the intertubes. The snaggers are watching.

Lyrical
#61
retired guy
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 3107
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2010/08/26 15:49:55
  • Location: ct-vacation place in Richland
  • Status: offline
RE: Salmon 2011/08/22 09:31:20 (permalink)
   Understand the Creek thing Salmo but then many shops  direct fishermen in tough conditions right to those places. Also guys get them from word of mouth.
  During the floods last year the creeks all round the area were trampled. Its NOT like ' nobody knows the secret' cause there are few 'secrets'.
  My old lonely Creek haunts have been pretty well hard hit for a number of years now. As the SR tightened up the area Creeks got more pressure.
  I attribute it more or less to the limited access to the SR that has evolved.
    HEY-- look at the ever popular Staircase area ( can I say that ?) try and fish it without violating a 'NO' sign.
#62
salmotrutta
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 2132
  • Reward points: 0
  • Status: offline
RE: Salmon 2011/08/22 10:34:05 (permalink)
Most of these places you guys talk about on the river I never been to unless I floated by it on a drift boat the one time I did that. I wish I did know more places but with limited time I usually go with what I know.
A couple stretches on the UFZ, Trash Compactor area of the river above and below 2A (lost my titanium forceps/scissors there last year grrr), around Ellis Cove, below the LFZ and the water below the ballpark, above and below the tressle. The spot in douglaston slayer told me to go to last year was cool too.
Other than that I don't know much.
Hiked back to the sportsmans pool once.
Other than that I donno. Maybe you guys can show me some new places that are conducive to fly chucking.

Lyrical
#63
retired guy
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 3107
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2010/08/26 15:49:55
  • Location: ct-vacation place in Richland
  • Status: offline
RE: Salmon 2011/08/22 10:48:40 (permalink)
I'm getting the same way- have 4 or 5 spots that I go to and thats IT. Cant get around like I used to so make them  my main go to places.
 Those days of walking the river for miles at a time are over- Started bein over when ya would be walking along and run into NO signs in places where ya cant cross or the other side is terrible.
   Funny how things creep up on ya over time-one spot at a time- then when ya look back you realize just how nice it really was 'back then'. Right down to NO DSR and walking in from the road. Used to be a real OPEN fishery --- no more.
  NOT knocking the DSR just saying how open and available to all the fishery used to be.
  Would be interesting if somebody made a map of all the areas that are now 'off limits' and then show areas that have very limited access and then areas that remain open. Might be an eye opener.- gotta include those VERY long walk kinda secret access areas as 'limited' too.
#64
draketrutta
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 1577
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2009/09/22 16:24:33
  • Status: offline
RE: Salmon 2011/08/22 11:01:36 (permalink)
RT - a map exists - I posted a link to the DEC conservation easements on the Clark Falls thread...
#65
dimebrite
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 3207
  • Reward points: 0
  • Status: offline
RE: Salmon 2011/08/22 11:27:44 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: draketrutta

RT - a map exists - I posted a link to the DEC conservation easements on the Clark Falls thread...


Drake; the conservation easement has nothing to do with access as far as my knowledge... I have a bank walking easement and a conservation easement on my property... conservation easement is there to prohibit development too close to the river... I could clear cut and build right up to the conservation easement if I wanted to; but that's not ny style.
#66
draketrutta
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 1577
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2009/09/22 16:24:33
  • Status: offline
RE: Salmon 2011/08/22 11:46:32 (permalink)
DB - I always stay between the water and those little signs the DEC posts to "access" my fishing spots...

I may have chosen the wrong term (conservation).



#67
retired guy
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 3107
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2010/08/26 15:49:55
  • Location: ct-vacation place in Richland
  • Status: offline
RE: Salmon 2011/08/22 12:35:52 (permalink)
   Might be interesting to see how many  easements there are where a NO sign is posted on a tree giving the impression that the area is off limits. Some folks do what they can get away with.  If I were walking along without a map or lawbook or Lawyer in my pocket and saw signs a few feet from the river saying No- I'd leave. Yea they 'might' be just talking about the interior property but the signs can easily give the impression of no River access.
    Lotsa places have no trees right at the edge and the impression would clearly be dont go there at all.....
   I recall the Staircase question I had a few weeks back where somebody said you could still fish it by staying in the water  and not walking the edge all the way from the Bridge to the Downtown Pool.. Thats nice in good conditions -unless ya get to a hole. Actually despite the well used paths take a look at the signs around the road too- makes ya think even walking down to the river is a dice roll.
     Take a look at the bottom of the Downtown Pool too. When last there long ago that too had signs restricting access all along the lower North side access places..
    I go there to have a nice time -not to fight about access or get thrown out of a place or get pinched.
  Thats THE  reason I have only fished the upper river or Ballpark areas and feeders for these past years- These issues do not generally exist there.
    In the more URBAN parts of the River folks have clearly taken a NO Fishing position in far too many cases. This leads to confusion and crowded conditions elsewhere.
  Actually it gets me urinated cause the fishery belongs to all of us and we all support it fiscally. There isnt a property owner up there (including me) whos tax bill isn't much lower than it could be because of the fishery and revenue it produces for the Towns along the River and its Tribs.
     Am finding all too frequently that- with the exception of those directly making a living from it- that the fishery and fishermen are not appreciated or wanted by a lot of folks.
      Wonder how much  that School Tax would be per property  if we fishermen who own camps and land up there and all the shops and places we support were not paying into it too without ever using that resource.
        How soon folks forget.
post edited by retired guy - 2011/08/22 12:53:30
#68
draketrutta
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 1577
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2009/09/22 16:24:33
  • Status: offline
RE: Salmon 2011/08/22 12:42:08 (permalink)
RT - I steer clear of the town of Pulaski for asethetic purposes...

I'd rather go fishless -vs- stare at ramshackle buildings and broken concrete -no amount of fish will lure me there.
#69
hot tuna
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 6388
  • Reward points: 0
  • Status: offline
RE: Salmon 2011/08/22 14:21:35 (permalink)
RT, NYS is so confusing about their regs you really need to have a law book in triplicate to interpret and even then a law degree. What about the average Joe fisherman ?? That’s why we waste so much money..

the PFR (public fishing rights ) are 2 fold.. Some only grant access while already on the water, example walking down the stream. Some give designated path way access through ones property..

the conservation easements are a whole animal in its self.. like dime said it's all how they were written..

Now my thought is if I'm paying through my tax dollars for the state to buy these right from the landowner then I should have access through the property and a set amount of land rights along the water.. It should just be a single standard and not all this baloney..


"whats that smell like fish oh baby" .. J. Kaukonen
#70
retired guy
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 3107
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2010/08/26 15:49:55
  • Location: ct-vacation place in Richland
  • Status: offline
RE: Salmon 2011/08/22 14:26:05 (permalink)
Know what your saying Drake-
     I don't condemn folks cause of the condition of the buildings and such but for the attitudes that come forth now and then. Also would readily agree that in many cases the fishermen themselves have caused the condition with rudness and litter- but I only take that so far---
     It's  been taken too far by many and we here have -to some degree- fallen into that trap too-  could be compared disliking all Bank Customers cause somebody robbed a bank, or blaming the Waitress cause ya didnt like your food-etc etc etc----
     Can be kinda funny sometimes- up there everybody seem nice and friendly they all wave and hold the door and stuff like that- Especially in Altmar and over where my place is in Richland too.  Mention fishermen though in some places and folks will be kinda quick to point out negatives-specially some of the local fishermen who believe we are just in their way.
  Mentioned all the Big Bucks I'v been reported killing in my area since I moved in on another post. Can't convince them I have yet to take any Deer up there---nope-- got the biguns. They actually tell me about it and refuse to believe otherwise when am standing there sayin NO. Cant imagine whats said bout that when I'm not there.
#71
draketrutta
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 1577
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2009/09/22 16:24:33
  • Status: offline
RE: Salmon 2011/08/22 14:44:30 (permalink)
RT - I wasn't condemming the folks that own the buildings, just the asthetics. I'd rather take a break and sit on a log in the woods upriver -vs- hang around that crummy town pool. (A few locals up there told me that the reason alot of houses look like crap on the outside is to prevent a major property tax hike if they fix it up - or maybe its because Oswego County is one of the poorest counties in the state - who knows for sure).

Bank robbers - I always root for them - it would be a cold day in haydes when a bank gets my sympathy or business - I'll stick with my credit union.

Deer?? remember - 10% of the hunters kill 90% of the Bambis....
#72
dimebrite
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 3207
  • Reward points: 0
  • Status: offline
RE: Salmon 2011/08/22 15:45:00 (permalink)
Hey tuna; I apologize in advance but I disagree with the access right in most cases... with my land they tried to squeeze in a 10' access path from the road to the river... in fine print to say the least; we threw it back at them... there is access about a 1/4 mile upstream from me regardless. On the other hand; if a state owned area is locked in with absolutely no access to it; that's a different story. But I can't see the state going 50/50 on this issue;.. now on the north bank sportmans subdivision they did up there; an access path and parking area was put in... I think they compromised there due to the abundance of land that was owned by nimo before hand. I picked mine up before it was even listed ; so they didn't have time to squeeze an access easement in. But yes I do have a conservation and angler right of way along the bank... and it doesn't bother me in the least...

As stated by others; downtown is a boiling pot of lead these days... a lot of differing views going on down there...
#73
dimebrite
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 3207
  • Reward points: 0
  • Status: offline
RE: Salmon 2011/08/22 15:48:36 (permalink)
Do keep in mind though guys that being the timee year it is this topic can create quite a circus here...
#74
Cohookhead
Avid Angler
  • Total Posts : 177
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2006/08/16 11:20:41
  • Location: Westerlo N.Y.
  • Status: offline
RE: Salmon 2011/08/22 15:49:20 (permalink)
I think its mostly a garbage issue up there. Every year you hear about this lot closed and land owners ticked off over their property being trashed with garbage, the usual coffee cups, wrappers, beer\soda cans an bottles, etc. If ya bring it in bring it out! And it sucks but I'll bring a small bag and pick up the trash that someone left where I fish only because I feel guilty if I look at it and leave it.

Stress is just one hookset away from being gone.
#75
hot tuna
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 6388
  • Reward points: 0
  • Status: offline
RE: Salmon 2011/08/22 16:07:44 (permalink)
so your saying that some land owner got paid from nys taxpayers dollars to have lifetime public fishing rights but in some cases such as high water, bank erosion or by boat the only way to access that area when possible is if someone else gets paid more ? Nah I think that is as crooked as my shoulder was before I fixed the problem.. Sorry man.. Just how I feel..

"whats that smell like fish oh baby" .. J. Kaukonen
#76
retired guy
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 3107
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2010/08/26 15:49:55
  • Location: ct-vacation place in Richland
  • Status: offline
RE: Salmon 2011/08/22 16:46:28 (permalink)
Tuna-
    Agree bout the ingress and egress issue - some of those paths I used to walk in on had signs saying fisherman access. Now they are replaced with NO.
Gotta wonder if second or third generation owners have simply decided to change things in their own favor in many places.
COHO-
Have said it before- hundred hunters in a place - can hardly tell they were there / a dozen fishermen- garbage city- SLOBS. Dont know when if ever the complainers will get the Govt up there to have L/E walking around giving out VERY expensive littering tickets and then putting it in all the papers and having it posted on the door of every fishing store around. THATS the kind of message that can clean things up. Nice to take along a garbage bag but it aint gettin the job done noway whatever.
DRAKE-
When it comes to Bambi  well- just havent seen what it takes in my back woods in NY---yet.  Get plenty right here in the Deer State ( Ct)-take an eater now and again but generally like my Deer over 2 1/2 and Ct gotum.-regular too.
post edited by retired guy - 2011/08/22 16:58:04
#77
dimebrite
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 3207
  • Reward points: 0
  • Status: offline
RE: Salmon 2011/08/22 17:08:23 (permalink)
tuna, i was gassing up my dump truck when posting; and then had to bounce out right away; so maybe i wasnt completely clear and allo over the place with my comments... sorry;

i disagree completely with the state mandating access on "private property" that has bank easement... a deed should not be broken. i am against eminant domain, and that woulda sorta fall under that in my opinion...

when it comes to fresh, raw land that hasnt been touched for generations; i believe it is sensible to grant an easement for ACCESS within the subdivisions prior to deeds being drawn up for the new parcels...

for the locked in areas that DO have BANK WALKING RIGHTS but NO ACCESS; i think its ludicrous for the state to take a land owners piece of property and tell them that they have to provide access... thats just how i feel...i believe they SHOULD provide access somewhere within their (the state's) land... an example; the staircase area... this area can be legally walked by anglers... but there is no parking or access; they SHOULD open the access lot back up on the lowernorth bank so people can legally access and fish this area...

maybe i said it a little better this time; or atleast i hope...

ps... i hope youre taking it easy on that shoulder man; the 18th is coming up
#78
dimebrite
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 3207
  • Reward points: 0
  • Status: offline
RE: Salmon 2011/08/22 17:11:19 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: retired guy


DRAKE-
When it comes to Bambi  well- just havent seen what it takes in my back woods in NY---yet.  Get plenty right here in the Deer State ( Ct)-take an eater now and again but generally like my Deer over 2 1/2 and Ct gotum.-regular too.


RT; the whole tug hill region and surrounding areas have fallen victim to mass poaching; ive seen it first hand... supposedly DEC has changed some regs to provide a better stock in future years... but poaching has taken a major beating on them...
#79
hot tuna
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 6388
  • Reward points: 0
  • Status: offline
RE: Salmon 2011/08/22 17:16:55 (permalink)
db, didn’t mean to raise the hackles, please don't give me that death stare again.. LOL,, I just don’t feel it's a fair shake for the sportsmen..

RT, ya know it is sickening.. I'm sure you all know how I do love the ausable and the Adirondacks.. Well the ausable River is as every bit as popular and used as the salmon River.. ya know what brings a tear to my eye on that water way.. It's Trash, litter & garbage.. BUT the big difference, it's not from the anglers at all.. It's from the idiots that toss their crap out the window as they drive along rt 73 & 86.. The roadway, which follows the stream, is covered with cig butts, beer cans & just plain trash.. So it's not only fishers , it's STUPID people in general..
Agreed littering ought be a min. $500.00 fine AND made to Fill 4 garbage bags of trash up from the area..

The motto is, always leave the area better then you found it..

"whats that smell like fish oh baby" .. J. Kaukonen
#80
retired guy
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 3107
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2010/08/26 15:49:55
  • Location: ct-vacation place in Richland
  • Status: offline
RE: Salmon 2011/08/22 17:39:22 (permalink)
Tuna- There are usually 2 ways to pinch a litterbug.
    #1 is the local ordinance which is generally kept rather low ( $25 to $50) by State Statute and requires a ticket to be paid - usually by mail-it  can be "upped' to a criminal arrest warrant if not paid.( then they simply pay it and -case over)
     #2 is a State littering Statute that usually has a much higher price tag and can mandate a court appearance.( $300 on the highway according to the signs)
     At least thats the CT ways but Ct and NY are generally quite  similar in criminal statutes. The problem that arises is that L/E is usually spread rather thin and that the criminal  thing has to be done by a Certified L/E individual.
     Here in Ct that means Academy Certified and the academy is a several months long full time course that only L/E can attend. $$$$$$$
   I would bet that NY is similar. Therefore who can afford to send a number of L/E out in an undercover capacity to wait till somebody throws stuff out. Then pinch them and gather and tag the evidence and prepare a case report and evidence trail for a potential court appearance and potential trial. Then go for #2.
   The ONLY way that stuff gets done is by public outcry resulting in 'selective enforcement' being created to diminish the outcry and satisfy the condition. As yet that clearly has NOT occurred on the SR.
   Case in point- how many L/e have been out undercover pinching snaggers and lifters ( we have all seen it) - and how many littering pinches did they ever make--never heard of it- have you?
  NOT bashing l/e here -its a question of marching orders.
  guys will holler -given a $2,000 find and lockem up on the spot- well go to Albny and change the laws- problem is the existing ones for some raason arent being attended to so what makes ya think any different bout your NEW ideas.
#81
draketrutta
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 1577
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2009/09/22 16:24:33
  • Status: offline
RE: Salmon 2011/08/22 19:10:12 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: dimebrite
for the locked in areas that DO have BANK WALKING RIGHTS but NO ACCESS; i think its ludicrous for the state to take a land owners piece of property and tell them that they have to provide access... thats just how i feel...i believe they SHOULD provide access somewhere within their (the state's) land... an example; the staircase area... this area can be legally walked by anglers... but there is no parking or access; they SHOULD open the access lot back up on the lowernorth bank so people can legally access and fish this area...


State taking the property for riverbank access? I thought the landowners were Paid for the easements, or given property tax abatements -correct me if I'm wrong.

Staircase gate - that was closed due to PIGS making noise at o'darkthirty, littering, urinating and deficating around people's houses. I don;t blame the residents on that street one bit for petitioning it;s closure.


#82
retired guy
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 3107
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2010/08/26 15:49:55
  • Location: ct-vacation place in Richland
  • Status: offline
RE: Salmon 2011/08/22 19:24:15 (permalink)
     If THATS the attitude lets close the whole fishery below Downtown Pulaski.-Some slobs do stuff and nobody hangs out and pinches the slobs-      
    Close it to all- thats easy and pure nonsense. Absolutley disgusting. Yep- take care of those folks who complain about the fishery they bought a house next to.
      Reminds me of the guy who bought a house next to a Farm here in my City. Yeaaaa real nice a Farmmmmm oh boy country living at its best. He called us Cops every other day for years till he died to complain bout flies, cow poop odors, roosters, mooing, the farmers weekend working hours Etc etc etc---.
      My Cousin the Game Warden still tells the story bout the City folks who bought in the Country and called Fish and Game. When he got to their house they wanted him to stop the PEEPERS at night for them  cause they couldn't sleep with all that noise.... Idiots...
     Guess that story means ya cant fish legal Below the Staircase either no legal access anyplace between the South side of the Town Pool and the poop pool.-----Then of course ya gotta pay to the Estuary.
     Perhaps there should be 'Truth in advertising'--you know --"come on up to the  Salmon River --the greatest half a fishing river in the US".--oops "cept for all those places ya cant go in the top half anymore either"---Ahhhh "maybee the Greatest 40% of a River anywhere"-- aahhhhh ,ummmmm  uhhhhh - hey Joe- lemme see that latest map----
post edited by retired guy - 2011/08/22 19:31:26
#83
hot tuna
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 6388
  • Reward points: 0
  • Status: offline
RE: Salmon 2011/08/22 19:32:29 (permalink)
yea db, maybe we are not understanding each other.. as drake said I agree by my original statement.. The state is not taking the land away from private property.. How can that be if the land owner got paid to allow public use ?
I just think what the State is doing is B.S. by having different views as public right away and access points.. It should all be 1 & the same , a fee gets paid to the land owner from public funds to use an amount of stream side access it should also ALWAYS include a pathway to that access.

As far as breaking the deed, it's my understanding these are forever into the deed even if sold.. Basically buyer beware right ? That should be a great price negotiator for the buyer, he is not getting a dime out of it ..

"whats that smell like fish oh baby" .. J. Kaukonen
#84
draketrutta
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 1577
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2009/09/22 16:24:33
  • Status: offline
RE: Salmon 2011/08/22 19:53:57 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: retired guy

    Perhaps there should be 'Truth in advertising'--you know --"come on up to the  Salmon River --the greatest half a fishing river in the US".--oops "cept for all those places ya cant go in the top half anymore either"---Ahhhh "maybee the Greatest 40% of a River anywhere"-- aahhhhh ,ummmmm  uhhhhh - hey Joe- lemme see that latest map----



That's why - with each passing year, I go up there less & less. To be quite honest, I'm on the fence whether or not I will ante up another $70 come Oct 1..

World Class -- my azzz....

I'd rather hang with HT in the Daks....
#85
retired guy
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 3107
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2010/08/26 15:49:55
  • Location: ct-vacation place in Richland
  • Status: offline
RE: Salmon 2011/08/22 21:02:29 (permalink)
   In regard to the State having  rights along the river and possible rights  to get into the river through Pvt Properties. THATS WHY folks have a Title search. It is done in ALL property transactions by the Atty. If it was there thats IT- no different than mineral rights or timber rights. Some day the Dozers might show up- ya knew that to begin with --period.
   Thats why I mentioned second or third 'generation' owners when talking bout NO signs where I recall fisherman access signs 20 or more years ago.
   The maps we have seen do not spell out ANY contracural language between the state and owners of the time when these rights were PURCHASED - nor should they. They are not that kind of document.
   I would hazard a guess that every fisherman on this Board who has spent a number of years on the SR recalls those yellow signs  and paths alongside residential properties and businesses and pastures that are now well posted NO. Cant recall the last time I saw one- but they seemed VERY official and were the same color as the river easement signs. Always figured they were from the STATE.
  I would doubt very seriously that these were all the result of the good will of those around at the beginning of the Fishery. Perhaps some but not all. First they posted the roads with no parking signs then the paths disappeared and the new NO signs showed up.
   Was it legit?- Would take an atty to search all properties along the river for the contract language between the State and initial landowner- should all be right in the Titles kept ( I believe) in the County Clerks Office. Or very likely at a State Agency Office responsible for such purchases.
 
#86
dimebrite
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 3207
  • Reward points: 0
  • Status: offline
RE: Salmon 2011/08/22 22:03:43 (permalink)
RT, you are 100% right; it would take an attorney to view the (possible) original deeds (if not burned or skewed)of every river front property... it seems as if some contained the right away and others didnt; maybe some were bought by the state; etc. etc. etc... also the garbage and rudeness factor for sure played a big role in owners exercising their right to post... i do believe the state should have passage ways (access) to state easements along the river; but for everyone with riverfront to grant access; no way...

drake; i honestly dont know the complete story behind river bank buy outs by the state from land owners.... my property was niagra mohawk land for well over 100 years before i bought it along with maybe 20 other parcels ranging from 5-20ish acres in size; in reality, who really knows; did nimo maybe accept money from the state when they decided to sell out???? very good possibility.... it would take a lot of digging for someone to get to the bottom of the whole story; and not really worth it in my opinion... if they did; i see no problem with it... there is access to it from a parking area.anglers benefit from it... now hypothetically speaking -" if nimo did get paid for their water front from the state"- there's a very good chance if they had opted towards not accepting the state money and selling the land on their terms; some chump wouldve picked it up and posted the banks and everyone in this thread would be complaing about another approximate 6000 other feet of bank that is posted; amen that all of us fellow fisherman have the right to walk the paths back their...

for the tax brakes; yes there is a a few acres that get taxed seperately, but all in all, there is no bargain; trust me...

oh yeah, for the bull dozer theory; yes they can do what ever they want; they could even take it from me if they wanted to i'm sure... i dont see it happening though; and its in " MY " deed that "I" must allow access to anglers along the bank and i would fight tooth and nail if they tried to take that away...its my property to half way through the river on my deed and site map...(not saying i would win; but i wouldnt go down with our a show to say the least)

lastly; drake never again maybe???? wow, i guess everyones different; i enjoy the area. i often catch moments of solitude even with out rod in hand and i look past all of the BS... i absolutely LOVE the summer time up there... watching the hawks and heron fish...etc...i think overall there is a presence of "better people" who frequent the area; i wont go as far as a better class but oeverall there are good and bad people in the world; i see a lot more good since my first trip in 1990 as an innocent 10 year old... ive grown with the place and can recount every year vividly along with pictures reminding me of times; then think back to what was happening in my life at that time... its a part of me... of course though, everyone is different and has their own opinions for their own reasons... i'm on the positive side of things when it comes to the region... and remeber guys, there is a lot more water and tribs (not just SR tribs) and lake to be fished than just the salmon river itself...
post edited by dimebrite - 2011/08/22 22:08:05
#87
hot tuna
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 6388
  • Reward points: 0
  • Status: offline
RE: Salmon 2011/08/22 22:39:10 (permalink)
Nimo signed that over to the state of NY in return for a tax break on all their river front. It is a permanent deal which transfers to anyone who buys that property in the future..

As for any or all water front to require/force access, absolutely not.. I understand and respect private property of any landowner (being one myself) but if the land owner signed a contract with NYS and was paid for with NYS taxpayer money for public use.. Then I believe it dam well ought to have access (not parking) to that public easement other then just from the waterway..

Lets say I own property on a lake, stream or river that is too deep to wade .. I sold NYS a public easement to fish there from your state tax dollars. My surrounding neighbors did not.. Don't you feel like NYS just wasted your hard earned money to pay for something you can never use ?

That’s all I'm saying.. I don’t fault the landowner at all, just the crooks who wasted my money..
post edited by hot tuna - 2011/08/22 22:50:36

"whats that smell like fish oh baby" .. J. Kaukonen
#88
retired guy
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 3107
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2010/08/26 15:49:55
  • Location: ct-vacation place in Richland
  • Status: offline
RE: Salmon 2011/08/22 23:03:19 (permalink)
Generally agree Dime-
    One sticking point though. When rights to anything involving property are SOLD and listed on the Deed records at the Clerks office -thats IT. ALL property owners from then on  when doing their title search are fully aware of those conditions at time of sale and by virtue of the sale have agreed to it.     
   Even if they didnt like it and didnt want to agree to it if they bought the place they are legally stuck with it. PERIOD.
  Litter and lousy behavior are tough things to deal with but the initial deal   had NO caviats for such things negating the deal.
     There are lots of farmers and landowners who have found themselves with an oil pump in the back 40 that they hate but the rights were sold by others long ago and the Oil Co finealy showed up and dug. That stuff was ON THE DEED and in full knowledge.  No excuses . Same for a lot of Timber.
  I fear that some of those old walkways are still on deeds and some are simply sayin I dont like it for this reason or that and have taken it upon themselvs to make changes that no one as yet has called them on.- They are in for a shock someday.
   Those yellow acess signs were NOT something good natured folks bought at the local hardware and put out just for the nice fishermen. NOOO They bought the NO signs a generation and probable sale or two later.
#89
retired guy
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 3107
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2010/08/26 15:49:55
  • Location: ct-vacation place in Richland
  • Status: offline
RE: Salmon 2011/08/22 23:23:22 (permalink)
Tuna-
      If the Access rights to the River included language at that time allowing folks to get to the river by means of a property thats IT.
       Can say what ya want bout Govt or Pvt property rights but somebody SOLD that right for money or consideration at the time they owned it. It wasnt a rental agreement it was a SALE of a particular right. All done by adults who knew what the deal was- duly deeded and recorded for all time and all future owners to clearly see before they bought.
    Now comes somebody else who says Naaaaahhh- well , call the state and  BUY BACK the rights or move on . That old-this is the USA and I have my rights - just  splatter when those right were SOLD  and everyone involved knows it-just a smoke screen for folks who think it may work.
     The FIRST thing I asked when buying my place was about Timber. NOPE- all mine- or I woulda gone on to another place. The very next year they tore up all around me for timber. - not on my place- and if they did and it was on the deed well thats the way it is. PERIOD.
      This is real life for  big kids and ya get what ya buy - not necessarily what ya wanted but ya had yer eyes wide open when ya did it so - man up.
     When ya buy a 6 dont  pout when ya look under the hood and dont see  an 8- you bought it- now drive it.
     Americans like to blame other people for their own 'issues'- Yea-I robbed the store and shot they guy but it was his own fault that I shot him ( actually had an idiot say that to me on his way to the clink).
post edited by retired guy - 2011/08/22 23:34:52
#90
Page: < 12345.. > >> Showing page 3 of 6
Jump to: