RE: 2009 PA Annual Wildlife Report
2010/11/23 17:55:49
(permalink)
I think I can top that. The unit that was rated as good in 2004 is now rated as fair and three units that were rated poor in 2004 now are rated as fair even though the percent regeneration is lower than it was in 2004. I would just love to have Dr. R. testify under oath and explain how they use forest health to establish antlerless allocations when there is no rhyme or reason to the ratings of forest health.