PGC slow to post kill success
RE: PGC slow to post kill success
2010/11/23 17:17:38
(permalink)
I just tell it like it is. I have not posted anything about the PGC that wasn't fact. They need to get their s**t togather. A lot of sportsman and property owner are fed up with them.
|
RE: PGC slow to post kill success
2010/11/24 15:18:57
(permalink)
Still no reports. The PGC site is truley a JOKE.
|
RE: PGC slow to post kill success
2010/11/26 12:16:01
(permalink)
|
S-10
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 5185
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2005/01/21 21:22:55
- Status: offline
RE: PGC slow to post kill success
2010/11/26 13:35:45
(permalink)
Looks like all that money they spent upgrading their computers and information systems really paid off.
|
deerfly
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 1271
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2010/05/03 16:06:32
- Status: offline
RE: PGC slow to post kill success
2010/11/26 16:42:20
(permalink)
Pennsylvania’s Deer Chronicle is a bi-annual publication where information about deer and their management can be found. Challenges and debates surrounding deer and deer management are not new to Pennsylvania. Deer Chronicle provides facts and explanations of the “whys†of deer management with accurate information. Each issue explores aspects of Pennsylvania deer management, dispels gossip in the “Rumor Reportâ€, gives historical perspective in “A Look Backâ€, addresses common questions in “You Don’t Say…â€, presents finding from in state research in “Observations from Penn’s Woodsâ€, and offers a broader picture in “Research Nationwide.†See what’s in the latest issue: Fall 2009 Deer Chronicle So much for keeping us informed.
|
RE: PGC slow to post kill success
2010/12/01 01:57:01
(permalink)
Thanks PGC for posting an update for bear and deer gun season. As always your agency is top notch and nothing less than professional. I'm sure all the youth hunters have enjoyed seeing and reading the updates.
|
dpms
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 3561
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2006/08/28 12:47:54
- Status: offline
RE: PGC slow to post kill success
2010/12/02 07:43:19
(permalink)
The release; PRELIMINARY 2010 BEAR HARVEST RANKS SEVENTH HARRISBURG – With 224 bears taken during the first-ever statewide, five-day archery bear season, and 2,815 bears taken during the restructured three-day bear season, which included a Saturday-opener, Pennsylvania Game Commission preliminary harvest reports show that bear hunters harvested a preliminary total of 3,039 bears in 53 counties. Official total bear harvest figures won’t be available until early 2011, after a detailed review of each harvest report is completed. In the 2005 bear season, hunters harvested a record 4,164 bears. Other recent bear harvests include: 3,512 in 2009; 3,460 in 2008; 2,362 in 2007; 3,124 in 2006; 2,977 in 2004; 3,000 in 2003; 2,686 in 2002; 3,063 in 2001; 3,075 in 2000; 1,740 in 1999; and 2,598 in 1998. For the first time, Game Commission employees working to gather data at the bear check stations were using new technology to record harvest information. This new approach was designed to improve the processing of bears so that hunters could get in and out of check stations quickly and improve accuracy in data collection. Despite this improvement in timely and accurate processing, the new system did lead to a delay in the release of harvest results. "While we recognize there is enormous public interest in bear harvest information, our primary responsibility is to accommodate successful hunters and to record harvest information accurately and efficiently," said Calvin W. DuBrock, Game Commission Bureau of Wildlife Management director. "The current number and distribution of bear check stations put virtually every successful hunter within a one-hour drive of a check station." "We also are striving to embrace technological efficiencies for data capture and to minimize processing times. In that regard, we are headed in the right direction, as the lines at bear check stations moved much quicker this year for the hunters. We’re already looking at ways to improve the process and expedite the release of harvest data next year." DuBrock noted that, according to the harvest data, the day-by-day archery bear harvest results are as follows: 90 bears harvested on Nov. 15; 32 on Nov. 16; 26 on Nov. 17; 23 on Nov. 18; and 53 on Nov. 19. For the three-day general bear season, 1,751 bears were harvested on Nov. 20; 793 on Nov. 22; and 271 on Nov. 23. In 2005, when the record bear harvest of 4,164 bears was set, hunters harvested 2,026 bears on the opening of day of the three-day season. Other first-day preliminary harvests for three-day statewide seasons were: 1,897 in 2009; 1,725 in 2008; 1,005 in 2007; 1,461 in 2006; 1,573 in 2004; 1,454 in 2003;1,348 2002; 1,812 in 2001; and 1,691 in 2000. The preliminary bear harvests by Wildlife Management Unit (with 2009 figures in parentheses) were: WMU 1A , 11 (8); WMU 1B , 42 (36); WMU 2A , 1 (0); WMU 2C , 307 (247); WMU 2D , 145 (128); WMU 2E , 93 (77); WMU 2F , 199 (282); WMU 2G , 892 (1,027); WMU 3A , 198 (255); WMU 3B , 232 (292); WMU 3C , 108 (73); WMU 3D , 256 (276); WMU 4A , 135 (125); WMU 4B , 53 (43); WMU 4C , 90 (141); WMU 4D , 244 (442); WMU 4E , 31 (58); and WMU 5C , 2 (1). The top five bear harvest counties this year, once again, all come from the Northcentral Region. The top county was Clinton, with 248 (295 in 2009); followed by: Lycoming, 228 (280); Tioga, 183 (217); Clearfield, 182 (135); and Potter 148 (181). Preliminary county harvests by region (with 2009 figures in parentheses) are: Northwest: Venango, 56 (33); Warren, 54 (101); Clarion, 47 (48); Forest, 47 (60); Jefferson, 33 (59); Butler, 12 (13); Crawford, 10 (8); Erie, 3 (0); and Mercer, 2 (3). Southwest: Fayette, 101 (72); Somerset, 83 (72); Westmoreland, 62 (65); Armstrong, 56 (44); Indiana, 42 (33); and Cambria, 18 (19). Northcentral: Clinton, 248 (295); Lycoming, 228 (280); Tioga, 183 (217); Clearfield, 182 (135); Potter 148 (181); Cameron, 138 (214); Centre, 118 (148); McKean, 92 (142); Elk, 89 (121); and Union, 46 (51). Southcentral: Huntingdon, 95 (110); Bedford, 84 (65); Mifflin, 41 (64); Blair, 31 (44); Juniata, 19 (33); Snyder, 19 (23); Perry, 17 (8); Fulton, 11 (16); Franklin, 8 (5); Cumberland, 1 (0). Northeast: Pike, 122 (117); Bradford, 38 (74); Monroe, 57 (77); Sullivan, 57 (68); Carbon, 35 (66); Luzerne, 58 (56); Wayne, 82 (49); Wyoming, 22 (44); Lackawanna, 16 (32); Susquehanna, 41 (30); Columbia, 20 (27); Northumberland, 3 (6); and Montour, 1 (1). Southeast: Schuylkill, 27 (37); Dauphin, 20 (24); Lebanon, 7 (8); Berks, 2 (7); and Northampton, 7 (5). According to preliminary reports, the top 10 legal bears processed at check stations for the two bear seasons all had actual or estimated live weights that exceeded 615 pounds, and 37 bears weighing 500 pounds or more were legally harvested. David Price, of Cresco, Monroe County, harvested the largest bear taken during all bear seasons, which he took using a bow and arrow. The male bear weighing an estimated 875 pounds was taken in WMU 3D, Monroe County, Middle Smithfield Township, at 3:30 p.m. on Nov. 15. While many have reported this as a “record bear,†for Pennsylvania’s official Big Game Records, the Game Commission only recognizes skull measurements based on Boone & Crockett scoring methods. Although weights are not included in the Game Commission’s Big Game Records tabulations, this was the heaviest bear ever harvested in Pennsylvania. Randy Chabol, of Somerset, Somerset County, harvested the largest bear during the regular three-day season, which was a male that had an estimated live weight of 772 pounds. The bear was taken in WMU 2C, Somerset County, Larimer Township, at 11:30 a.m. on Nov. 20. Rounding out the top 10 were: a 694-pound male (actual live weight) taken in WMU 2D, Indiana County, Armstrong Township, by Christopher Schultheis, of Kittanning, at 10 a.m. on Nov. 20; a 679-pound male (estimated live weight) taken in WMU 2C, Indiana County, West Wheatfield Township, by Ronald Chero, of Homer City, at 3 p.m., on Nov. 23; a 675-pound male (estimated live weight) taken in WMU 3D, Pike County, Blooming Grove Township, by Brett Treichler, of Kutztown, at 2:30 p.m. on Nov. 20; a 666-pound male (estimated live weight) taken in WMU 2G, Centre County, Burnside Township, by David Mihalik, of Howard, at 4 p.m. on Nov. 20; a 656-pound male (estimated live weight) taken in WMU 3B, Sullivan County, Forks Township, by George Mosier III, of New Albany, at 2 p.m. on Nov. 22; a 645-pound male (estimated live weight) taken in WMU 3C, Wayne County, Clinton Township, by Diane Booths, of Lake Ariel, at 7:30 a.m. on Nov. 20; a 616-pound male (estimated live weight) also taken in WMU 3C, Wayne County, Buckingham Township, by Mark Soden, of Honesdale, at 9:30 a.m. on Nov. 20; and a 616-pound male (estimated live weight) taken in WMU 3D, Pike County, Porter Township, by David Mohn, of Robesonia, at 7:10 a.m. on Nov. 20.
My rifle is a black rifle
|
Big Tuna
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 1882
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2001/02/04 16:31:51
- Status: offline
RE: PGC slow to post kill success
2010/12/02 08:03:50
(permalink)
Those pie's do put on weight. Bozo ate well. Thanks dpms for the info.
|
bingsbaits
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 5059
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2007/03/01 06:32:10
- Location: NW, PA
- Status: offline
RE: PGC slow to post kill success
2010/12/02 08:22:57
(permalink)
Good info Dp.. Just a quick question, didn't he whack BOZO with a crossbow ?
I love the sweet smell of Victory and the Salty taste of Liberal Tears in my coffee. BB
|
dpms
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 3561
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2006/08/28 12:47:54
- Status: offline
RE: PGC slow to post kill success
2010/12/02 08:44:37
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: bingsbaits Just a quick question, didn't he whack BOZO with a crossbow ? As far as I know. The picture I saw showed him with one. There are still many folks that don't consider compounds bows either. That is another discussion though.
My rifle is a black rifle
|
deerfly
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 1271
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2010/05/03 16:06:32
- Status: offline
RE: PGC slow to post kill success
2010/12/02 10:34:22
(permalink)
It took six shots from crossbows to kill that bear.
|
S-10
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 5185
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2005/01/21 21:22:55
- Status: offline
RE: PGC slow to post kill success
2010/12/02 14:36:03
(permalink)
Bear hunters in Warren County suck, myself included. Sunday in a 1/2 mile walk behind my house I saw tracks of a sow with cubs and a big single bear. There go my bird feeders again.
|
wayne c
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 3473
- Reward points: 0
- Status: offline
RE: PGC slow to post kill success
2010/12/02 18:03:57
(permalink)
" There are still many folks that don't consider compounds bows either." Yeah. Around half of the whole 2 dozen strictly "traditional" bow hunters in the state. lol.
|
RE: PGC slow to post kill success
2010/12/07 00:31:47
(permalink)
The PGC site reports still not up. Not everyone reads this forum. Once again PGC fine job your doing with the website. What a WASTE!
|
ready2fish
Expert Angler
- Total Posts : 787
- Reward points: 0
- Status: offline
RE: PGC slow to post kill success
2010/12/07 12:24:35
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Outdoor Adventures The PGC site reports still not up. Not everyone reads this forum. Once again PGC fine job your doing with the website. What a WASTE! If you mean the bear harvest, it's been on the PGC site since Dec 1st.
Kistler Custom Rods Pro Staff GAMMA Fishing Lines Pro Staff
|
RE: PGC slow to post kill success
2010/12/07 14:16:26
(permalink)
Thanks ready2fish I see this now. You have to search for it to find. I would think it would be on the home page. I am disappointed that there are no pics as in the past. Many Jr hunters like to see pics. No wonder we have a decline in youth hunting.
post edited by Outdoor Adventures - 2010/12/07 14:17:12
|
Ironhed
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 1892
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2001/11/07 19:10:08
- Status: offline
RE: PGC slow to post kill success
2010/12/07 14:38:04
(permalink)
I am disappointed that there are no pics as in the past. And if it was on the homepage, you'd complain that it wasn't typed in big, bold letters. And if it was, you'd find a way to moan about it not being automatically emailed to you the day it was published. And if you did receive said email, I'm sure the FishErie.com Hunting Boards would hear just how upset you were that PA's head bear biologist didn't hit you up on your cell phone to let you know the results that night. And if you did get that call... Ironhed
|
eyesandgillz
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 4052
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2003/06/18 11:30:03
- Status: offline
RE: PGC slow to post kill success
2010/12/07 14:42:19
(permalink)
rain, rain, go away.. PS - wayne, there were probably that many or more successful "traditional" bow kills posted just on bowsite.com this year. many more out there than you think. I hope to be one of them one of these days....
|
SonofZ3
Expert Angler
- Total Posts : 657
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2009/10/12 10:24:37
- Status: offline
RE: PGC slow to post kill success
2010/12/07 17:36:14
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Outdoor Adventures Thanks ready2fish I see this now. You have to search for it to find. I would think it would be on the home page. I am disappointed that there are no pics as in the past. Many Jr hunters like to see pics. No wonder we have a decline in youth hunting. So declining numbers of youth hunters are not due to the decrease in outdoor recreation throughout childhood, the decrease in time spent with fathers and father figures, or increase in use of electronic entertainment, but because the deer harvest survey posted on the game commission's site didn't have pictures? Yeah, that makes sense.
Support your local Fly Shop! OHWM
|
RE: PGC slow to post kill success
2010/12/07 17:45:02
(permalink)
It is what it is ! You can flap your lips all you want. The site is a JOKE ! ORIGINAL: Ironhed I am disappointed that there are no pics as in the past. And if it was on the homepage, you'd complain that it wasn't typed in big, bold letters. And if it was, you'd find a way to moan about it not being automatically emailed to you the day it was published. And if you did receive said email, I'm sure the FishErie.com Hunting Boards would hear just how upset you were that PA's head bear biologist didn't hit you up on your cell phone to let you know the results that night. And if you did get that call... Ironhed
|
RE: PGC slow to post kill success
2010/12/07 17:54:53
(permalink)
Kids want to see pics of dead bear in hopes that some day they might be in one of those pics. Plain and simple ! I said nothing about deer as you stated. Pay attention before you you engage your mouth. ORIGINAL: SonofZ3 ORIGINAL: Outdoor Adventures Thanks ready2fish I see this now. You have to search for it to find. I would think it would be on the home page. I am disappointed that there are no pics as in the past. Many Jr hunters like to see pics. No wonder we have a decline in youth hunting. So declining numbers of youth hunters are not due to the decrease in outdoor recreation throughout childhood, the decrease in time spent with fathers and father figures, or increase in use of electronic entertainment, but because the deer harvest survey posted on the game commission's site didn't have pictures? Yeah, that makes sense.
|
RE: PGC slow to post kill success
2010/12/07 17:58:32
(permalink)
Yes. A bow and arrow is not the same as a crossbow. Just a another screw up on the PGC's part. ORIGINAL: bingsbaits Good info Dp.. Just a quick question, didn't he whack BOZO with a crossbow ?
|
SonofZ3
Expert Angler
- Total Posts : 657
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2009/10/12 10:24:37
- Status: offline
RE: PGC slow to post kill success
2010/12/07 19:06:48
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Outdoor Adventures Kids want to see pics of dead bear in hopes that some day they might be in one of those pics. Plain and simple ! I said nothing about deer as you stated. Pay attention before you you engage your mouth. ORIGINAL: SonofZ3 ORIGINAL: Outdoor Adventures Thanks ready2fish I see this now. You have to search for it to find. I would think it would be on the home page. I am disappointed that there are no pics as in the past. Many Jr hunters like to see pics. No wonder we have a decline in youth hunting. So declining numbers of youth hunters are not due to the decrease in outdoor recreation throughout childhood, the decrease in time spent with fathers and father figures, or increase in use of electronic entertainment, but because the deer harvest survey posted on the game commission's site didn't have pictures? Yeah, that makes sense. So newspapers, photos in sporting goods stores, and hunting periodicals won't provide that?
Support your local Fly Shop! OHWM
|
thedrake
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 1948
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2005/11/14 22:22:18
- Status: offline
RE: PGC slow to post kill success
2010/12/07 19:13:39
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Outdoor Adventures I am disappointed that there are no pics as in the past. Many Jr hunters like to see pics. No wonder we have a decline in youth hunting. WOW! So, a lack of pics on the PGC website is causing a decline in youth hunters? Does anyone else think this is the dumbest post they've ever seen on fisherie?
|
deerfly
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 1271
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2010/05/03 16:06:32
- Status: offline
RE: PGC slow to post kill success
2010/12/07 19:57:50
(permalink)
No, junior license sales were increasing until 2003, but have been declining as the herd has been reduced.
|
spoonchucker
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 8561
- Reward points: 0
- Status: offline
RE: PGC slow to post kill success
2010/12/07 20:18:02
(permalink)
"No, junior license sales were increasing until 2003" NO, they weren't Resident Junior 98,233 62,586 57,661 56,801 54,793 53,739 52,473 48,922 45,818 41,743 40,004 38,203 ( 1998-2009 )
Get Informed, Get Involved, And Make A Difference. Step Up, or Step Aside The next time you say "Somebody should do something", remember that YOU are somebody. GL
|
Esox_Hunter
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 2393
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2006/08/02 14:32:57
- Status: offline
RE: PGC slow to post kill success
2010/12/07 20:19:49
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: deerfly No, junior license sales were increasing until 2003, but have been declining as the herd has been reduced. Just to compare apples to apples here; how does the nationwide trend compare with PAs?
|
deerfly
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 1271
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2010/05/03 16:06:32
- Status: offline
RE: PGC slow to post kill success
2010/12/07 20:22:45
(permalink)
The decrease in the number of deer hunters in PA is much larger than the decrease in in hunters nationwide.
|
Esox_Hunter
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 2393
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2006/08/02 14:32:57
- Status: offline
RE: PGC slow to post kill success
2010/12/07 20:43:11
(permalink)
How bout some links? Especially since Spoon disproved your assesment on PA junior hunter numbers.
|
deerfly
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 1271
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2010/05/03 16:06:32
- Status: offline
RE: PGC slow to post kill success
2010/12/07 21:11:13
(permalink)
Spoonchecker didn't prove squat. He only provided the stats for one class of junior licenses sales and he didn't provide a link to support his position.
|
|
|