Berkely vs. Seaguar

Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
Author
trout man
Avid Angler
  • Total Posts : 158
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2009/02/04 15:20:17
  • Status: offline
2010/10/01 10:43:45 (permalink)

Berkely vs. Seaguar

Hey everyone. After reading the copolymer vs. fluoro post i was re-thinking my chioce. Can i get a few opinions regarding Berkely Vanish vs. Seaguar Invizx in 6# for my spinning reel? I had heard about Seaguar being a quality line, however berkely has served me well over the years. New to using the fluoro lines. This wll be my first experience with it. I believe in getting the best quality equipment within one's budget, not necessarilly the most expensive. Thanks in advance for your help.

Trout Man
#1

38 Replies Related Threads

    psu_fish
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 3104
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2008/08/28 22:37:11
    • Location: PA
    • Status: offline
    RE: Berkely vs. Seaguar 2010/10/01 11:31:47 (permalink)
    I like Vanish but I might try out the Seaguar.Here in Clarion Co. its easier to walk into Wal-mart and buy Vanish
    #2
    Bogeyjoker
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 1704
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2000/12/22 14:02:54
    • Location: NW PA
    • Status: offline
    RE: Berkely vs. Seaguar 2010/10/01 11:35:23 (permalink)
    Vanish works ok for a leader, but is horrible casting stuff as a main line.
    #3
    catchinfish
    Expert Angler
    • Total Posts : 351
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2007/11/22 11:36:28
    • Status: offline
    RE: Berkely vs. Seaguar 2010/10/01 11:37:47 (permalink)
    I used berkely vanish for a few years and did like it, though most on this board don't.  To each his own.  I switched to Spiderwire flouro and love it.  My buddy swears by seagur.  He uses for just about every species he fishes for.

    "I know not what with weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."
    -Albert Einstein
    #4
    pafisher
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 3000
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2002/08/15 11:14:30
    • Status: offline
    RE: Berkely vs. Seaguar 2010/10/01 11:41:01 (permalink)
    P-line is what I use,great line for the money.
    #5
    Cold
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 7358
    • Reward points: 0
    • Status: offline
    RE: Berkely vs. Seaguar 2010/10/01 11:43:17 (permalink)
    Lots of people here really pour the Haterade on Vanish. Before I took up a fly rod, I used it, with success, in 2# test on my ultralight and really liked it, though the extremely light line probably helped it to behave.

    For Erie, what little spin fishing I do, I use Seaguar InvizX in 6# test and have been extremely pleased with it.
    #6
    ShutUpNFish
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 3834
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2007/03/16 10:31:34
    • Status: offline
    RE: Berkely vs. Seaguar 2010/10/01 11:46:47 (permalink)
    My experiences with Vanish were pretty bad, but this was about 5 years ago and since may have been improved. The stuff twisted up like crazy and freyed easily. The fish were on fire and it made for a frustrating day, so I stripped the spool and went with something else. Why limit yourself to just those 2? Theres many other flouros on the market which are both good quality and economical. Been using Sufix flouro lately down the river, and it has been pretty strong. I would definitely NOT use ANY flouro as a mainline though. Good luck with your choice.
    post edited by ShutUpNFish - 2010/10/01 11:48:13
    #7
    catchinfish
    Expert Angler
    • Total Posts : 351
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2007/11/22 11:36:28
    • Status: offline
    RE: Berkely vs. Seaguar 2010/10/01 11:54:50 (permalink)
    Great point, Shutupnfish.  I've been thinking about trying out some seagur and maybe some sufix or pline.  I have become very comfortable with Spiderwire but am always willing to give other brand a try.  Once this spool runs out maybe I'll give it a shot.

    "I know not what with weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."
    -Albert Einstein
    #8
    egg_drifter
    Avid Angler
    • Total Posts : 102
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2010/08/15 16:24:23
    • Location: SWPA
    • Status: offline
    RE: Berkely vs. Seaguar 2010/10/01 12:35:08 (permalink)
    Why not use a quality mono line and then add 3 ft. flouro leader? Just seems foolish to spool all that big money line on the reel Then maybe only use 50% of it before having to respool. I dont know... I just never seen no reason to have 150yds. of 100% flouro on my reel when I only need 3ft. Good luck with whatever you try.
    #9
    SteelSlayer77
    Expert Angler
    • Total Posts : 489
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2010/08/31 21:00:00
    • Status: offline
    RE: Berkely vs. Seaguar 2010/10/01 13:31:59 (permalink)
    Why not use a quality mono line and then add 3 ft. flouro leader?


    Trout man, if you spool 100% 6# floro, your going to get way to many break offs.  Floro isn't as rugged and doesn't stretch as well as mono, these fish will run up and down the creek rubbing your line against anything they can.

    Trust me spool your spinning real with 6 or 8# mono and use a 6# floro leader.  I prefer 8# mono main line with a 3' 6# floro leader.
    #10
    Cold
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 7358
    • Reward points: 0
    • Status: offline
    RE: Berkely vs. Seaguar 2010/10/01 13:48:46 (permalink)
    If the fluoro is so bad and abrasion-vulnerable, and break-off prone, why are you putting it on your line in a position where its getting the most abrasion and most likelihood of breaking off?

    Trout man, if you spool 100% 6# floro, your going to get way to many break offs.


    I officially call bullsheet on this.

    Been using Seaguar InvizX without any breakoffs due to line abrasion for several years.
    #11
    ShutUpNFish
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 3834
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2007/03/16 10:31:34
    • Status: offline
    RE: Berkely vs. Seaguar 2010/10/01 14:06:37 (permalink)
    Cold, I just don't like the flouro as a mainline for a few reasons... its usually stiffer and doesn't seem to cast as nicely, its expensive and it sinks. I bet they'll come out with a flouro that does all those things eventually if not already.
    post edited by ShutUpNFish - 2010/10/01 14:14:44
    #12
    Cold
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 7358
    • Reward points: 0
    • Status: offline
    RE: Berkely vs. Seaguar 2010/10/01 14:15:36 (permalink)
    Wasn't addressing you with that one, sunf. I use a fluoro leader on my med. spinning setup with a PowerPro mainline, but my reasons (and yours) make sense. Avoiding using fluoro as a mainline because it will break, but then using it as a leader is nonsense.
    #13
    SteelSlayer77
    Expert Angler
    • Total Posts : 489
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2010/08/31 21:00:00
    • Status: offline
    RE: Berkely vs. Seaguar 2010/10/01 14:36:01 (permalink)
    If the fluoro is so bad and abrasion-vulnerable, and break-off prone, why are you putting it on your line in a position where its getting the most abrasion and most likelihood of breaking off?


    I use fluoro for a leader because of the low clear conditions often found in Erie.  If the water is up and green or murky then I will use a mono leader.  It's more about the stretch than the abrasion resistance.  Mono has lots of stretch but fluoro has very little.  If you think fluoro is as strong as mono then I'm calling "bullsheet" on you Cold!

    Try this experiment in NY for King Salmon.  Take two identical spinning rods and spool one with #12 mono and the other with #12 fluoro and tell me which breaks more often and quicker?  I've done this twice, once with Berkley and once with Stren, it's not even close.  Every tackle shop in Pulsaki will tell you the same thing also.  Or try this experiment in Erie with 4# line.

    Fluro might work better on a fly rod, because of the additional pressure that the fly rod absorbs compared to a spinning rod.
    #14
    Cold
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 7358
    • Reward points: 0
    • Status: offline
    RE: Berkely vs. Seaguar 2010/10/01 14:47:36 (permalink)
    So why do you need stretch?

    Either way, your reasons for saying
    Trout man, if you spool 100% 6# floro, your going to get way to many break offs.

    are all crap.

    How often do you break your mainline anywhere other than near your terminal tackle?

    If you break off enough to conduct some silly experiment you need to learn how to fight a fish.
    #15
    SteelSlayer77
    Expert Angler
    • Total Posts : 489
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2010/08/31 21:00:00
    • Status: offline
    RE: Berkely vs. Seaguar 2010/10/01 14:52:44 (permalink)
    So why do you need stretch?


    Monofilament line stretches, which can be bad or good.  Stretch makes line more forgiving when a big fish makes a strong run, but it also makes it harder to set the hook.  The amount of stretch can be controlled by the additives but all monofilament will stretch some.

    http://fishing.about.com/library/weekly/aa111702a.htm

    In Erie I rarely ever break my main line.  In Pulaski NY when fishing King Salmon it's pretty common unless your using 18+#  line or are fishing in an area where you can actually let a fish run and it's not shoulder to shoulder.
    #16
    SteelSlayer77
    Expert Angler
    • Total Posts : 489
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2010/08/31 21:00:00
    • Status: offline
    RE: Berkely vs. Seaguar 2010/10/01 15:16:19 (permalink)
    If you break off enough to conduct some silly experiment you need to learn how to fight a fish.


    Sorry Cold, I guess you are a fishing god and never need to experiment at all when your fishing.  After hooking up with 30+ Chinook on a good day using my normal setup, I find it fun to take a break or start experimenting a little.  Especially if you have multiple rods rigged with different setups all ready to go.
    #17
    Cold
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 7358
    • Reward points: 0
    • Status: offline
    RE: Berkely vs. Seaguar 2010/10/01 15:17:39 (permalink)
    Whatever dude.

    If you're getting 'way too many' breakoffs by spooling up with 6# fluoro, you're doing something wrong.
    #18
    SteelSlayer77
    Expert Angler
    • Total Posts : 489
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2010/08/31 21:00:00
    • Status: offline
    RE: Berkely vs. Seaguar 2010/10/01 15:22:27 (permalink)
    If you're getting 'way too many' breakoffs by spooling up with 6# fluoro, you're doing something wrong.


    When I'm using a 6.5' spinning rod, then yes I get "way too many" breakoffs with 6# fluoro, unless I'm in an area where I can leave my drag pretty loose and let the fish run for a long time.  When I'm using a 10' fly rod, I get hardly any breakoffs with 6# fluoro.   Just sayin
    #19
    Cold
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 7358
    • Reward points: 0
    • Status: offline
    RE: Berkely vs. Seaguar 2010/10/01 15:27:25 (permalink)
    Then you're doing something wrong.

    Just sayin'
    #20
    akitadog
    Expert Angler
    • Total Posts : 977
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2007/01/23 08:14:53
    • Status: offline
    RE: Berkely vs. Seaguar 2010/10/01 15:54:30 (permalink)
    nothing beats 4# Pline for steel. me and a couple buddies started out using vanish and before long we all went to Pline. the vanish isnt very abbrasion resistant and could not get it to stop twisting up. had many many birds nest with the line exploding off our reels. we will never by nothing but Pline.
    #21
    SteelSlayer77
    Expert Angler
    • Total Posts : 489
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2010/08/31 21:00:00
    • Status: offline
    RE: Berkely vs. Seaguar 2010/10/01 16:01:45 (permalink)
    Just offering my opinion.  Never claimed to be the "perfect" fisherman who never makes a mistake like you are implying about yourself. 

    Maybe I am doing something wrong, but I still catch plenty of Salmon, Steelhead, and trout to keep me happy almost every time out.  I feel confident in my ability to catch Steelhead after more than 30 years of experience trout fishing year round. 

    I have also heard allot of people on these very boards complain about 6# line breaking to often when spin fishing in faster water, and allot of guys who use 8# line in Erie when the water is high and off colored.
    #22
    SteelSlayer77
    Expert Angler
    • Total Posts : 489
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2010/08/31 21:00:00
    • Status: offline
    RE: Berkely vs. Seaguar 2010/10/01 16:10:12 (permalink)
    nothing beats 4# Pline for steel.


    You guys are crazy, what kind of rod are you using that 4# line with?  It might be great if you have the creek to yourself and can reduce your drag to nothing letting the fish run where ever it wants to.

    I fish Erie using 8# main line and a 6# leader and never have a problem catching fish after fish, whether the water is low and clear or high and green.  Why would I want to go lower and risk breaking off a large fish so that I can hook up with 20 fish instead of 19?
    #23
    ShutUpNFish
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 3834
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2007/03/16 10:31:34
    • Status: offline
    RE: Berkely vs. Seaguar 2010/10/01 17:08:06 (permalink)
    I agree...I never use anything less that 8# mainline. 4lb. mainline is too light.
    #24
    akitadog
    Expert Angler
    • Total Posts : 977
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2007/01/23 08:14:53
    • Status: offline
    RE: Berkely vs. Seaguar 2010/10/01 18:22:52 (permalink)
    i use 4# Pline with a 3.7# seagar leader in manchester hole when it is jammed packed and not have a problem. i use a 10.6 cortland noodle rod. if its alittle merky i use the strait 4# pline with no leader and most of the time can horse them in.
    #25
    ShutUpNFish
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 3834
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2007/03/16 10:31:34
    • Status: offline
    RE: Berkely vs. Seaguar 2010/10/01 18:25:49 (permalink)
    I'm gonna go right ahead and call a BIG FAT BS right there!!!!!
    #26
    akitadog
    Expert Angler
    • Total Posts : 977
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2007/01/23 08:14:53
    • Status: offline
    RE: Berkely vs. Seaguar 2010/10/01 19:08:39 (permalink)
    have you been in the creek and some guy around you was just rippen em. and your like **** hes tearing em up. probably because he was use 3# to 4# floro leaders with size 18 or 20 hooks.
    #27
    2fish
    Novice Angler
    • Total Posts : 58
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2000/12/17 02:51:36
    • Location: Franklin, Pa.
    • Status: offline
    RE: Berkely vs. Seaguar 2010/10/01 19:13:25 (permalink)
    I use 4# McCoy Mean Green as a mainline and 6# Cabelas No-Vis flouro for leader. This is on a 10.5 ft. St. Croix noodle rod with very few break off's. This has been my set up for years now. Cabelas No-Vis seems to me to have much better knot strength than Vanish. Call BS if you like but it is what it is.

    Love 2fish
    Live 2fish
    Work in order to afford 2fish
    #28
    ShutUpNFish
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 3834
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2007/03/16 10:31:34
    • Status: offline
    RE: Berkely vs. Seaguar 2010/10/01 19:50:41 (permalink)
    I'm sorry, but it makes absolutely NO sense to use a leader that is heavier in breaking poundage than your mainline. The main purpose of a leader thats lighter than your mainline is so anything that breaks, breaks below your connection to your mainline so you don't lose your whole rig.

    There is NO need for a mainline that is 3# or 4# especially if you're using tippet material which may be as light as you want since it SHOULD be the only line that might be seen by the fish. And NO, I have rarely seen guys around me slammin' fish when I wasn't. DONE
    post edited by ShutUpNFish - 2010/10/01 20:29:36
    #29
    Steel Junkie
    Expert Angler
    • Total Posts : 297
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2009/08/28 15:13:03
    • Status: offline
    RE: Berkely vs. Seaguar 2010/10/01 22:00:45 (permalink)
    Im gonna have to side whith shutupnfish on this one. It is pointless to use a heavier leader than your main line. I would love to see how you land a fish on 3.7lb line in a jam packed hole with no problems. There is no reason to use any heavier than 6lb line until march or april then I will use 4lb.
    #30
    Page: 12 > Showing page 1 of 2
    Jump to: