Not sure why people deny (my bad, can’t say facts) but reliable research?

BTW, who watches the View and even worse, considers it news? MSNBC = Fox News. Both MOSTLY televise entertainment garbage. I don’t get either station, so I haven’t watched either in over a year. But doubt that either changed much since then. The research pretty much makes it clear that neither changed. If I see someone post some type of news that sounds interesting to look up, if Reuters, Associated Press or WSJ isn’t running the story, I pretty much call BS. Journalistic standards should matter.


https://guides.library.ha...edu/newsleans/thechart

https://www.allsides.com/..a-bias/media-bias-chart


https://adfontesmedia.com...tive-media-bias-chart/

Porktown

bigfoot
In my opinion the associate press leans way to the liberal/progressive point of view in there articles.

AP leans furthest left of the three that I noted, especially since Trump. Reuters is probably the most center. WSJ leans right. I use Daily Mail if WJS pops up as paid article, but prefer WSJ since I like to think it will help me investing. It hasn’t, but nice to dream. All follow a pretty strict journalistic standards that is missing in many outlets now. Reading what these three combined have to say of something, I feel at least most of the important facts are covered. Then piece together an opinion. Most subjects that opinion is, “When it comes down to what is really important, I don’t really care”….

My phone has these and only moderate (lean left/right) that are listed as fact/reliable reporting. Maybe this is all a woke mind control thing to program me of what is fact/reliable???

Interesting. Thanks for the info.

Here you go, Time’s man of the year interview, transcribed

https://time.com/7201565/...nald-trump-transcript/

I challenge anybody to get through the whole thing. It’s a completely indecipherable mess of nonsensical rambling where Trump is constantly trying to talk out of both sides of his mouth on pretty much every issue discussed.

I get that he is basically a Rorschach test for many voters because people just pick the things that they want to believe out of all the partially digested word salad that he vomits everywhere. But what I don’t understand is how more people can’t simply see through his act, because he is just so obviously full of shiit.

Is it because when a “normal politician” does the same thing, they are too slick? So when Trump rambles like a buffoon snd spins around double talking in circles, people find him credible because he actually sounds like an idiot?

Porktown

crappiefisher
 Cable news is for the old farts these days.
 
 
 Hey Pork!!... 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Does TDS count? If so, guilty!

Please tell me you have video of how that happened!

MyWar
Here you go, Time’s man of the year interview, transcribed

https://time.com/7201565/...nald-trump-transcript/

I challenge anybody to get through the whole thing. It’s a completely indecipherable mess of nonsensical rambling where Trump is constantly trying to talk out of both sides of his mouth on pretty much every issue discussed.

I get that he is basically a Rorschach test for many voters because people just pick the things that they want to believe out of all the partially digested word salad that he vomits everywhere. But what I don’t understand is how more people can’t simply see through his act, because he is just so obviously full of shiit.

Is it because when a “normal politician” does the same thing, they are too slick? So when Trump rambles like a buffoon snd spins around double talking in circles, people find him credible because he actually sounds like an idiot?

Cope/Harder should be your pronouns