Maybe he will invoke the act of 1798 like he said he could/would do on day one to help clean up the mess of the last year that congress was going to pass to help with the boarder?
 
 That act will give him the power to take away free speech also. He has said networks and podcasts that don't agree with him should loose their license as it is.
 
 Never happen even if passed in congress. He can't just wave a magic wand like he dreams.  He ran on the same promise in 16. How did that work out?
 
 To windy for fishing today.

 Deporting the criminal illegals has been going on for a long, long time nothing new there.  
 

There are also a huge number  that have been found in violation via  court actions.
I believe-could be mistaken- its because they never showed up for their pre scheduled immigration hearing dates they got when entering and just disappeared into America.
These -the gang members and criminals come to a pretty large number and will take some time to locate and remove in and of themselves.
Talking heads on the lib side make it sound like some kinda roundup as they try to create trouble but Trump has mentioned those above in his speeches.
Not that it may be just a start but I fail to believe its gonna be Armageddon like some try to say,

 Tim, on the tip thing, so many of those workers are in the poor class with children and don't pay taxes on them anyway. Is the earned income tax credit still in existence for families? If so they get a large return when filing.
 
 In Trump's speeches he said he hated paying over time and would just hire more part time employees to get out of it.   
 
 How would the Gov. make up the billions in loss on the S.S. and overtime? Just sink the ship down farther.

Porktown
The way Trump talks in is general terms, with talking heads interpreting everything after the fact, who knows what much of this will look like in legislation format. From the spin prior to the election, some said deporting any violent criminal, some said all here illegally. Unless they know they are a flight risk to return, I have no issue with the violent criminals being deported. I find it hard to believe this wasn’t happening. If we know it is safer to keep here (knowing that they will likely return), then I’m fine with exceptions to keep them here incarcerated. Yes, paying for them stinks, but the risk of them returning if violent and actively involved in something organized that the chances of returning are high.

Until we see what any of the legislation looks like, it is just speculation. Each side presenting what their media sources are providing.

Regarding immigration, most of what has been discussed can be done unilaterally by the executive branch. It will not have to go through Congress.

Neither will most of the deregulation and dismantling of federal agencies. They will challenge that stuff in the courts and our conservative SCOTUS will simply say the existence of the EPA, the FCC, and the FTC is unconstitutional. Poof. Gone. Add any and all other three letter “deep state” government agencies to that list.

Just as Trump did last time, the only real policy agenda that they need Congress for is budgetary stuff, primarily tax cuts.

Repeal of the ACA remains to be seen. Republicans will need Congress for that but I don’t expect this to be a high legislative priority, but who knows.

Generally speaking tho, they won’t need Congress for much. They’ve been cooking up a list of things that they can do with only the executive branch and the courts. That’s what project 2025 is.

Just wait and see.

crappiefisher
Is the earned income tax credit still in existence for families?
 

Won’t be for long

ICE NUT
 
What part of illegal don't you guys understand also there not law abiding folks if they.Correct me if im wrong There here as criminals right lOur crops and hotels and landscapers have been here for years they have green cards and have been doing that work for lazy americans for decades.

 
Illegal in that those 5% of the US workforce are undocumented and here illegally.
8+ million of them which means none of them can qualify for a work permit or green card.
I'm not saying if it's right or wrong. All I'm saying is that it has to have have a negative impact on inflation. 

For the nonviolent, but here illegally folks. Wouldn’t it be easier, as per law enforcement, to pass legislation on illegal employment? If there are no jobs for these folks, they will leave on their own. Would be a lot safer/easier to have pencil pusher type investigators going through records showing illegal. Have some surveillance operations, but not having to deal with rounding up the illegals. Have a hard date, say 3-4 months out, very well publicized for employers to clean their operations of illegals. Gives those immigrants time to go back. Can even have programs to ship them back voluntarily. We’d end up having to pay for their transportation if deported anyway. Unless Mexico is going to pay for that after the wall?

  Tim, He promised removing all the illegal immigrants when he won in 2016 .He removed less than Obama. Pretty sure he is more bark than bite again.
 
 But be prepared to hear over and over again, stock market, unemployment, economy, oil, infrastructural and so on and so on that it is the "best ever, never seen anything like it before and the greatest of all time"
 
 Only in his mind, he can't wait.
 
 Oh well, it's all good.
 
 Most old men I have known had became more mellow than tough with age.
  

 Especially since he won't get impeached, cases will be dropped and has more power this time around. He should be in a much better mood.