You're just repeating what I was saying. Thing is, you can't pick you're gender. So bad analogy. You can pick your party but not your gender. I get what you are saying but I think it was a bad analogy.
If I really wanted to vote in a primary for a candidate that I favored above all others, I can always re-register. I almost did this for Nikki Haley. 
Also, that's why I mentioned Clinton and Gingrich together. (Clinton/Gingrich). And it can still happen today as there was a bipartisan agreement for the border. 
I'll even go as far as saying that deficit spending is more under control with a split in Executive/Congregational power but then Trump blew that statistic out of the water during his first term. 
 I have no problem with Trump removing illegals. I'm against males playing in women. But lets see what he does with with spending this time around. Hopefully better than his last term.  
 
 
 
 

Dano we do agree on some things as far as Trumps spending in his 1st term Don't you think COVID had most to do about the spending.I don't care who was president during that time it was needed to to come up with vaccines,PPe equipment and money for business to stay afloat. 

dano
I'm against males playing in women.
 

I much prefer playing around in there and making it last a bit longer. Seems to bring on a more intense finish. Wham bam thank you ma’am at times is good, but shouldn’t be a rule!

100% behind there being sports restrictions. I do feel for those kids that were born with female parts, but male chromosomes. Which was the case of that Algerian boxer. Not sure where they should be classified, but not a fan of them being abused by MAG****holes as if they made a choice for an unfair advantage.

bigfoot
Well do much for this thread. thanks to pork for blowing it up! Why don’t you just keep your nose out of it and stick with the rest of your lib buddies on the other threads!

He's pretty conservative, honestly. Have you read his posts?