Pachuckles
Expert Angler
- Total Posts : 342
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2008/04/03 16:40:36
- Status: offline
Re:Tamarack dam(s) update
2012/08/03 19:53:27
(permalink)
After reading the article in the paper yesterday morning. I drove over to Tamarack Lake this morning. They had placed their nets and were taking the fish to Woodcock Lake. As of 11:00 A.M. they had netted 2 walleye (25" & 22") 2 Largemouth Bass (legal) and LOT of small panfish most being 6"/8" Crappie. The guy on the truck said 90% of the fish were Crappie. The water temp. is close to 85+* but the rain this weekend should cool it down some. That may help them to be able to trap more fish, although rain will only take longer for the draw down to take place. Oh, yes !!...There are a TON of carp in there.
You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to skydive twice.
|
eyesandgillz
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 4043
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2003/06/18 11:30:03
- Status: offline
Re:Tamarack dam(s) update
2012/08/03 22:51:49
(permalink)
No musky netted so far? Wonder if it would be less stressful to net/ shock at night with the cooler temps?
|
anzomcik
Expert Angler
- Total Posts : 721
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2007/07/31 05:16:41
- Status: offline
Re:Tamarack dam(s) update
2012/08/04 08:51:35
(permalink)
The biologist I talked to on the phone said they have got three (yes only 3) musky. He is said that the trap nets are far less effectivie when the fish are not shallow.
|
Ymesss
Avid Angler
- Total Posts : 121
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2010/05/28 08:25:51
- Location: Cochranton PA
- Status: offline
Re:Tamarack dam(s) update
2012/08/04 09:25:15
(permalink)
anzomcik The biologist I talked to on the phone said they have got three (yes only 3) musky. He is said that the trap nets are far less effectivie when the fish are not shallow. Interesting.... Thanks for making the call az.
|
KingKool
Avid Angler
- Total Posts : 234
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2009/11/23 11:04:26
- Status: offline
Re:Tamarack dam(s) update
2012/08/04 14:50:45
(permalink)
Pachuckles Oh, yes !!...There are a TON of carp in there. I suppose they'll leave them there to rot..................
4 out of 3 people don't understand fractions.
|
troutguy
Expert Angler
- Total Posts : 642
- Reward points: 0
- Status: offline
Re:Tamarack dam(s) update
2012/08/04 16:53:11
(permalink)
From what I understand the carp(and also bullheads) survived the last time the lake was drained as they never restocked them.
|
Accountant
Expert Angler
- Total Posts : 528
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2010/08/03 17:35:09
- Status: offline
Re:Tamarack dam(s) update
2012/08/06 10:40:00
(permalink)
KingKool
Pachuckles
Oh, yes !!...There are a TON of carp in there.
I suppose they'll leave them there to rot..................
thats what they did when they drained glade run lake in bulter co.
|
outasync
Expert Angler
- Total Posts : 730
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2008/05/21 12:46:09
- Location: Burghill Ohio
- Status: offline
Re:Tamarack dam(s) update
2012/08/06 13:30:35
(permalink)
Was at woodcock yesterday while they were putting in some of the t-rac fish. Seen a ton of crappie a close to 5 lbs largemouth and a giant walleye. The musky will be well fed for a while off the disoriented lazy crappie. We seen hundreds hanging out around the no wake bouys just off the dock
|
just keep a few
New Angler
- Total Posts : 50
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2008/03/28 11:06:03
- Location: Meadville
- Status: offline
Re:Tamarack dam(s) update
2012/08/10 12:55:05
(permalink)
I was just at the lake this morning around 10am and it looks like they are wrapping up the fish "salvage" operation, pulling in nets etc. My buddy and I were in dismay to watch what was happening. We arrived at the south end dam and parked along the road where there were two other guys watching the operation. My buddy and I saw three large front end loader buckets of fish...all very ALIVE being driven into the woods on the other side of the dam breastworks and dumped in the woods! The net boats would run out and fill the galvanized tubs that had no water in them, proceed to shore in the south parking lot and meet the front end loader and use buckets to scoop the fish into the front loader, loader would back up turn around and drive across the dam into woods with fish literally flopping out of the filled bucket and return empty. It was sickening to see all those fish being killed. The guys we talked to said they did take 2 truck loads out for transport then in the interim they would just load up the front loader and dump them in the woods. I asked a PAFBC guy why they were dumping the fish in the woods and his reply was: "it is what the DEP requires us to do with the dead fish" I said: " but they are LIVE fish" and he said they won't be for long if left in the lake. Maybe they have no choice but it just didn't seem right to see all those fish just being wasted. We rough estimated perhaps tens of thousands were dumped in the woods. If you need verification just walk across the south dam and follow the front loader tracks in the soft ground to the dump spot....very sad.
post edited by just keep a few - 2012/08/10 12:59:53
|
Pork
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 1419
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2009/05/04 11:06:26
- Location: NWPA
- Status: offline
Re:Tamarack dam(s) update
2012/08/10 16:10:09
(permalink)
"If you ever get hit with a bucket of fish, be sure to close your eyes." ><)))*>
|
wade alexander
Expert Angler
- Total Posts : 293
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2011/04/18 14:50:25
- Status: offline
Re:Tamarack dam(s) update
2012/08/10 16:45:52
(permalink)
why dont they use the meat at shelters or something.... would be a better use for it than dumping it in the woods. I know it would be quit an operation. id just think it would equal alot of meat that wouldnt be wasted that could be used somewhere. they should have announced a free for all, then i wouldnt have to fish all **** winter for walleye lol
|
bigesox11
Avid Angler
- Total Posts : 122
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2009/05/02 10:06:38
- Status: offline
Re:Tamarack dam(s) update
2012/08/21 14:20:29
(permalink)
Sorry, but it just sounds like **** POOR PLANNING TO ME!
|
B.A.
New Angler
- Total Posts : 34
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2005/08/24 09:39:59
- Status: offline
Re:Tamarack dam(s) update
2012/08/31 10:42:40
(permalink)
Took a ride out to Tamarack yesterday and I was sickened by the view. I was able to see one small pool of water on the Cochranton end of the lake. There is new grass starting to grow in the vast visable field of stumps. I did see quite a few Blue Herons walking the shallows for prey. Surprisingly there was quite a lot of fish splashing going on with some of it coming from large fish in the deper waters of the pool. Lots of small dimples as well. This lake cannot be allowed to stay this way for very long.
|
fishin coyote
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 1719
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2002/05/04 07:31:21
- Status: offline
Re:Tamarack dam(s) update
2012/11/18 07:21:36
(permalink)
Nothing is Free!! Reward equals Effort
|
muskefisher
Avid Angler
- Total Posts : 108
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2007/11/23 19:37:37
- Status: offline
Re:Tamarack dam(s) update
2012/11/22 11:31:12
(permalink)
good news but hopefully they will dredge it to make it a little deeper. it will still be a long time before its fishable again.
|
CAP78
Avid Angler
- Total Posts : 134
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2008/03/02 21:07:57
- Status: offline
Re:Tamarack dam(s) update
2012/12/11 07:43:15
(permalink)
For any of you that look at google maps, they updated their satellite image for the Meadville area this year and it shows an empty Tamarack lake.
|
troutguy
Expert Angler
- Total Posts : 642
- Reward points: 0
- Status: offline
Re:Tamarack dam(s) update
2013/02/03 16:47:50
(permalink)
|