RE: New Antler Restictions 3 up law
2011/11/08 21:06:45
(permalink)
Shooting a protected buck is a mistake plain and simple and will probaly cost you $500 if caught. Probaly why some guys would rather let them rot and go look to shoot another.
|
RSB
Expert Angler
- Total Posts : 932
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2010/08/11 22:55:57
- Status: offline
RE: New Antler Restictions 3 up law
2011/11/08 23:18:14
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Outdoor Adventures Shooting a protected buck is a mistake plain and simple and will probaly cost you $500 if caught. Probaly why some guys would rather let them rot and go look to shoot another. You simply either don’t know at all what you are talking about or you are just doing your best to mislead people into doing something that causes them to get in big trouble for not reporting a mistake kill. We handle hundreds of mistake kills every year and very few of them get charged with anything more than a $25.00 mistake if they tag and report the kill as the law requires. Generally the ones that get charged with an illegal deer are the ones that sneak it home, doesn’t report it and then tries to claim it was a mistake when the WCO shows up. Yes, there have been a few others that claimed mistake that I didn’t accept like the guy sneaking a big ten point out in the middle of the night that he claimed he had thought was an antlerless deer, (because that was the only tag he had left). The tracks in the snow around the kill site didn’t come even close to the story he told. I have charged a few others with an illegal deer, instead of a mistake, when they took the deer home, skinned it and butchered it without bothering to report it as a mistake until I showed up. Yes I believe some of them did make a mistake when they shot it but they made an even bigger mistake when they gambled on not getting caught with it after they failed to report it as a mistake kill. Even when we find it was pretty careless of them not to have counted the points correctly we accept them as a mistake unless there are other factors that indicate it was simply an illegal kill, someone saw them and turning them in or they simply failed to report it as a mistake until the WCO was knocking on their door. And, yes those that leave it laying the woods and fail to report it as a mistake are ALWAYS going to get charged with an illegal deer when we are able to prove they shot it, and you would probably be surprised at how easy that is sometimes. R.S. Bodenhorn
|
Dr. Trout
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 4417
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2002/03/03 03:12:33
- Location: Jefferson County (2F)
- Status: offline
RE: New Antler Restictions 3 up law
2011/11/08 23:19:33
(permalink)
If a person is not 100% sure a buck has the required number of points and still pulls the trigger ... please tell me how that is a mistake... ???? Sounds to me like it is poor judgement at best and the shooter is betting it has the correct number of points but is not sure and shoots anyhow... that is taking a chance .. not making a mistake... The tine is only 3/4 of an inch and I thought it was an inch.. now that I may consider as a mistake...
post edited by Dr. Trout - 2011/11/08 23:21:19
|
RE: New Antler Restrictions 3 up law
2011/11/08 23:40:34
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: RSB ORIGINAL: Outdoor Adventures Shooting a protected buck is a mistake plain and simple and will probably cost you $500 if caught. Probably why some guys would rather let them rot and go look to shoot another. You simply either don’t know at all what you are talking about or you are just doing your best to mislead people into doing something that causes them to get in big trouble for not reporting a mistake kill.  We handle hundreds of mistake kills every year and very few of them get charged with anything more than a $25.00 mistake if they tag and report the kill as the law requires. Generally the ones that get charged with an illegal deer are the ones that sneak it home, doesn’t report it and then tries to claim it was a mistake when the WCO shows up. Yes, there have been a few others that claimed mistake that I didn’t accept like the guy sneaking a big ten point out in the middle of the night that he claimed he had thought was an antlerless deer, (because that was the only tag he had left). The tracks in the snow around the kill site didn’t come even close to the story he told. I have charged a few others with an illegal deer, instead of a mistake, when they took the deer home, skinned it and butchered it without bothering to report it as a mistake until I showed up. Yes I believe some of them did make a mistake when they shot it but they made an even bigger mistake when they gambled on not getting caught with it after they failed to report it as a mistake kill.  Even when we find it was pretty careless of them not to have counted the points correctly we accept them as a mistake unless there are other factors that indicate it was simply an illegal kill, someone saw them and turning them in or they simply failed to report it as a mistake until the WCO was knocking on their door. And, yes those that leave it laying the woods and fail to report it as a mistake are ALWAYS going to get charged with an illegal deer when we are able to prove they shot it, and you would probably be surprised at how easy that is sometimes.  R.S. Bodenhorn      Good for you it's your job to catch those who intentionally break game laws. Some WCO do recognize a honest mistake and some don't. Tuna explained how his friend got screwed over for a honest mistake.I hear a lot of guys complaining about the antler regs. Probably why the PGC has once again changed the requirements. Outlaws will always be outlaws but when a honest hunter is forced to make a decision that could send him financially into a tail spin what do think the odds are of him reporting it hoping he gets an honest and understanding wco to investigate ? I would rarely find deer left to rot but now more and more are showing up. Why ?
|
DarDys
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 4938
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2009/11/13 08:46:21
- Location: Duncansville, PA
- Status: offline
RE: New Antler Restictions 3 up law
2011/11/09 07:54:36
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: RSB ORIGINAL: Outdoor Adventures Shooting a protected buck is a mistake plain and simple and will probaly cost you $500 if caught. Probaly why some guys would rather let them rot and go look to shoot another. You simply either don’t know at all what you are talking about or you are just doing your best to mislead people into doing something that causes them to get in big trouble for not reporting a mistake kill. We handle hundreds of mistake kills every year and very few of them get charged with anything more than a $25.00 mistake if they tag and report the kill as the law requires. Generally the ones that get charged with an illegal deer are the ones that sneak it home, doesn’t report it and then tries to claim it was a mistake when the WCO shows up. Yes, there have been a few others that claimed mistake that I didn’t accept like the guy sneaking a big ten point out in the middle of the night that he claimed he had thought was an antlerless deer, (because that was the only tag he had left). The tracks in the snow around the kill site didn’t come even close to the story he told. I have charged a few others with an illegal deer, instead of a mistake, when they took the deer home, skinned it and butchered it without bothering to report it as a mistake until I showed up. Yes I believe some of them did make a mistake when they shot it but they made an even bigger mistake when they gambled on not getting caught with it after they failed to report it as a mistake kill. Even when we find it was pretty careless of them not to have counted the points correctly we accept them as a mistake unless there are other factors that indicate it was simply an illegal kill, someone saw them and turning them in or they simply failed to report it as a mistake until the WCO was knocking on their door. And, yes those that leave it laying the woods and fail to report it as a mistake are ALWAYS going to get charged with an illegal deer when we are able to prove they shot it, and you would probably be surprised at how easy that is sometimes. R.S. Bodenhorn I very much agree, that if any, and I mean any, type of cover up is attempted, then they deserve the maximum penalty. Good work on your part on the above.
The poster formally known as Duncsdad Everything I say can be fully substantiated by my own opinion.
|
World Famous
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 2213
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2009/02/13 14:36:59
- Location: Johnstown
- Status: offline
RE: New Antler Restictions 3 up law
2011/11/09 12:21:40
(permalink)
Just wondering,In the case of the deer taken in the reason for this thread, since he saw nothing wrong with taking the 9 point buck,would he be perceived as "hiding the deer" or would a mistake killing penalty be in order?...WF
|
RSB
Expert Angler
- Total Posts : 932
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2010/08/11 22:55:57
- Status: offline
RE: New Antler Restictions 3 up law
2011/11/09 22:31:56
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: World Famous Just wondering,In the case of the deer taken in the reason for this thread, since he saw nothing wrong with taking the 9 point buck,would he be perceived as "hiding the deer" or would a mistake killing penalty be in order?...WF Without actually seeing the antlers there is no way I can answer that question. If the deer has four points that measure more than an inch on an antler it is legal or if it has three points up top, excluding the brow times it is legal. Frequently hunters refer to bumps on the antler base as points though when they really don’t meet the definition and legal requirements of being a point. It is hard to tell from the post without a picture if the buck is legal or not. We ALL give the hunter the benefit of the doubt on those that are questionable though. When they don’t get the benefit of the doubt though is when there is no doubt it not meeting the antler requirements and they failed to report it as a mistake kill. If there is a question about it being legal the best way to find out is call it in and have the WCO take a look at it. I have had many turned in as questionable and once I looked at it and had the hunter measure the antlers or points it turned out to be a legal harvest. In those cases I sign their tag (so any other officer will know I approved it) and send them on their way with both their legal kill and piece of mind. R.S. Bodenhorn
|
RE: New Antler Restictions 3 up law
2011/11/09 22:41:32
(permalink)
I have had many turned in as questionable and once I looked at it and had the hunter measure the antlers or points it turned out to be a legal harvest. So you never gave a citation then for a questionable buck, ever, that was turned in ?
post edited by Outdoor Adventures - 2011/11/09 22:42:03
|
BloodyHand
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 2169
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2009/03/30 08:20:46
- Status: offline
RE: New Antler Restictions 3 up law
2011/11/09 22:48:58
(permalink)
I would rarely find deer left to rot but now more and more are showing up. Why ? Since the AR, I've seen alot more of this. What used to be shed hunting, has turned into carcass finding.
|
RSB
Expert Angler
- Total Posts : 932
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2010/08/11 22:55:57
- Status: offline
RE: New Antler Restictions 3 up law
2011/11/09 23:10:46
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Outdoor Adventures I have had many turned in as questionable and once I looked at it and had the hunter measure the antlers or points it turned out to be a legal harvest. So you never gave a citation then for a questionable buck, ever, that was turned in ? I have always given hunters the benefit of doubt when there was any doubt or question about the legality of the antlers. I have never cited anyone for an illegal deer when they turned in a mistake unless there were glaringly obvious reasons and supporting evidence to prove they only turned it in after they got caught with an illegal deer and then just tried using the mistake as a defense for what was obviously an intentional illegal kill. R.S. Bodenhorn
|
RSB
Expert Angler
- Total Posts : 932
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2010/08/11 22:55:57
- Status: offline
RE: New Antler Restictions 3 up law
2011/11/09 23:18:02
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: BloodyHand I would rarely find deer left to rot but now more and more are showing up. Why ? Since the AR, I've seen alot more of this. What used to be shed hunting, has turned into carcass finding. I have experienced just the opposite when it comes to finding dead deer left in the field to rot. Before antler restrictions and concurrent seasons I used to have dozens of shot and rotting deer reported to me each year. I would also find a number each year after the season was over. Since antler restrictions I have had very few dead and rotting deer reported and now rarely find a dead deer hunters left. Some dead deer will always be found though because some deer are wounded and just escape being found by hunters after it is wounded. That doesn’t mean it was shot and left to avoid prosecution though I am also sure that happens from time to time by a few or our unscrupulous hunters. R.S. Bodenhorn
|
RE: New Antler Restictions 3 up law
2011/11/09 23:35:50
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: RSB ORIGINAL: Outdoor Adventures I have had many turned in as questionable and once I looked at it and had the hunter measure the antlers or points it turned out to be a legal harvest. So you never gave a citation then for a questionable buck, ever, that was turned in ? I have always given hunters the benefit of doubt when there was any doubt or question about the legality of the antlers. I have never cited anyone for an illegal deer when they turned in a mistake unless there were glaringly obvious reasons and supporting evidence to prove they only turned it in after they got caught with an illegal deer and then just tried using the mistake as a defense for what was obviously an intentional illegal kill. Â R.S. Bodenhorn I answer I expected
|
World Famous
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 2213
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2009/02/13 14:36:59
- Location: Johnstown
- Status: offline
RE: New Antler Restictions 3 up law
2011/11/10 07:00:42
(permalink)
Since I don,t hunt in a 4 point area, I didn,t even read the requirements for a legal buck. I assumed by the context of the thread that a buck was only legal if it had 3 up. Thanks for the clarification on the regs for me and others like me that are ignorant of the regs in this matter...WF
|
Big Tuna
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 1882
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2001/02/04 16:31:51
- Status: offline
RE: New Antler Restictions 3 up law
2011/11/10 15:21:11
(permalink)
The buck was NOT LEGAL it was the biggest 6PT I ever saw BY 6 PT I mean 2 huge brows and 2 huge forks on both sides,the left horn had 3 kicker below the brow tine all kicker where over and inch and 2 where 2 inches or better. Trouble is it did not have 3 points on the main beam excluding the brow,it only had 2 points per side.This deer may be 1 in a 100,because with all that main beam ANYBODY would have thought it would be legal.Funny thing about this the deer was driven to the 20 some year old kid(on the ground)by the older guy,so I'm guessing the kid didn't look it over to well.Them again some guys just don't read the rules,and the rules are sometimes not so clear.Go read the AR rules on page 45 and 53 do you think there clear? I think PGC should have had two different pages one for the 3 point area and one for the three and up area (as to not confuse anyone) Just my to cents.
|
treesparrow
Expert Angler
- Total Posts : 651
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2005/02/21 09:27:15
- Status: offline
RE: New Antler Restictions 3 up law
2011/11/15 23:34:38
(permalink)
After hearing this argument I feel like we have all gone insane. If the kid didn't see the points around the burr then he lucked out. The game commisions definition of brow tine is "the brow tine is the point immediately above the antler burr" making the lowest 1" sticker the brow tine. Then every point above it would be a point. And above all else, doesn't a WCO have enough important things to do than split hairs and try and prosecute this kid. No wonder so many youths are leaving hunting.
|
RE: New Antler Restictions 3 up law
2011/11/15 23:48:56
(permalink)
There ya go folks more grey regs from the PGC. Now I know why many refere to the digest as the Comic book.
|
Dr. Trout
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 4417
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2002/03/03 03:12:33
- Location: Jefferson County (2F)
- Status: offline
RE: New Antler Restictions 3 up law
2011/11/16 00:11:40
(permalink)
tree.. they may have been points in the sense of "counting points' for a buck pool, or bragging rights on the number of "points" BUT that said .. the new rule for the old 4 point areas is... to be a legal buck == it must have 3 points off the main beam ..... 3 points OFF THE MAIN BEAM .. brow tines and any stickers around the brow tine are not - off the main beam ... and thus are not counted as for making it a legal buck... MAN === are guys going to get this messed up and it appears to me to be so simple.. "3 up " = 3 off the main beam.... don't worry about brow tine or points not on the main beam...they do not count AT ALL ...
post edited by Dr. Trout - 2011/11/16 00:14:13
|
RE: New Antler Restictions 3 up law
2011/11/16 00:22:38
(permalink)
[image] [/image] Ok Trout how many points does this buck have and does he have browe tines ?
|
Dr. Trout
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 4417
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2002/03/03 03:12:33
- Location: Jefferson County (2F)
- Status: offline
RE: New Antler Restictions 3 up law
2011/11/16 00:47:05
(permalink)
|
Dr. Trout
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 4417
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2002/03/03 03:12:33
- Location: Jefferson County (2F)
- Status: offline
RE: New Antler Restictions 3 up law
2011/11/16 00:48:23
(permalink)
work at 8AM.. so that's enough of OA for me tonight ....
|
RE: New Antler Restictions 3 up law
2011/11/16 00:50:16
(permalink)
You still didn't answer my question How many points does he have and does he have browe tines. I don't care if he is legal or not. What is so hard about the question ?
|
MuskyMastr
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 3032
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2005/06/30 17:39:29
- Location: Valley of the Crazy Woman
- Status: offline
RE: New Antler Restictions 3 up law
2011/11/16 01:04:10
(permalink)
In the first year of AR, there were some 55 odd cases in the state of PA that resulted in $500 fines for protected deer being shot. 35 of those were in WMU 1A. Seems like an abnormally high number to me. As it turns out, people who turned themselves in and presented the deer to pgc personel expecting a $25 fine, were escorted back to the scene and a judgement call was made as to whether or not they should have been able to identify the deer. Others who turned themselves in, were simply given a blanket statement. "The law says identify your target. Here's your $500 fine". No investigation period. This type of "shoot from the hip" justice is what breeds distrust of the PGC as a whole. I really wish that there was much more PR training or people skills reqirements for the job. It would do wonders for the public image.
Better too far back, than too far forward.
|
RE: New Antler Restrictions 3 up law
2011/11/16 01:40:09
(permalink)
.
post edited by Outdoor Adventures - 2011/11/16 01:50:11
|
Big Tuna
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 1882
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2001/02/04 16:31:51
- Status: offline
RE: New Antler Restrictions 3 up law
2011/11/16 07:33:38
(permalink)
Yea it is a sad STATE to hunt in! I see a dink 5pt chasing a doe the last day at 20 yards THATS LEGAL,yea thats right 3 up and 2 up no brows,maybe a 10 inch spread.The kid kills a huge 6pt w/3 sticker over and inch under the brows and it's not.You got to love Ohio,Ny,and WV. I just might hunt Ohio the first day of gun season and just go DEER HUNTING.
|
MuskyMastr
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 3032
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2005/06/30 17:39:29
- Location: Valley of the Crazy Woman
- Status: offline
RE: New Antler Restrictions 3 up law
2011/11/16 14:37:56
(permalink)
AMEN. WVA bound in 2 days. Plain old deer hunting.
Better too far back, than too far forward.
|
World Famous
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 2213
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2009/02/13 14:36:59
- Location: Johnstown
- Status: offline
RE: New Antler Restrictions 3 up law
2011/11/16 14:47:31
(permalink)
Just a thought about dead deer being found, maybe one finds less of them now because there is not many there to begin with. Could be a reason ....WF
|
treesparrow
Expert Angler
- Total Posts : 651
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2005/02/21 09:27:15
- Status: offline
RE: New Antler Restrictions 3 up law
2011/11/16 14:57:43
(permalink)
Now Doc.I'm going to do my best to show you are wrong in this rediculous argument. Under an amendment in Ohio House Bill 238,main beam is defined as" length of the antler beam" means measurement from the lowest outside edge of the antler burr on a white-tailed deer over the outer curve to the most distant point of what is or appeares to be the main antler beam beginning at the place on the antler burr where the center line along the outer curve of the beam intersects the antler burr. Now Doc. it sure appears Ohio coniders the main beam to be from the burr to the tip.In Ohio all points are off the main beam. Pa says in our book of confusion that "the brow tine is the point immediately above the antler burr." So I guess if there is no traditional brow tine then you have to not count the first point immediatily out the main beam. I'm getting so confused Doc. I am just getting more mixed up than ever. No wonder so many youths are leaving hunting.
|
surffishn
Novice Angler
- Total Posts : 63
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2000/10/29 19:38:51
- Status: offline
RE: New Antler Restrictions 3 up law
2011/11/16 15:08:49
(permalink)
Big Tuna I could not agree more PEE AYE sucks.Since AR I have found atleast 10 bucks left in the woods.One winter after hunting season I watched two Bucks together several times.They looked like twins the left sides had A big Y and A long brow tine the right was A huge looking spike.I know these racks were 3.5 years or older.The base of antlers were huge.Except for A junior hunter they would never be legal.These scrub bucks are left year to year to breed. Sorry but AR's do not work.Unless you have complete control to manage land.That means shooting undesirable deer so they do not breed.I did not hunt PEE Aye last year first time since 1965 I was 12 then. I will be moving out of this state in A year or so.I used to support the PGC but saddly this state has the stupidest game laws I have yet to read.Here is A example they want kids to start hunting.My Grandsons live in NC one is 2.5 one will be 1 next week.I bought both of them there hunting and fishing license for life in NC.It cost $375 for each child.They can always YES ALWAYS hunt or fish in NC even if they change residency.Dose PEE Aye offer anything like this? We all know the answer. Instead you have WCO's looking for leads to arrest hunters on this web site.Thats about the most tastless thing I ever heard from A WCO.But hey its PEE AYE. PGC tries to make as much money from Fines and Anterless Tags as they can.This state is losing hunters faster than any other I wonder why? See YA in Ohio or WV. Go DEER HUNTING and Good LUCK!
post edited by surffishn - 2011/11/16 15:11:49
|
RE: New Antler Restrictions 3 up law
2011/11/16 15:32:29
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: treesparrow Now Doc.I'm going to do my best to show you are wrong in this rediculous argument. Under an amendment in Ohio House Bill 238,main beam is defined as" length of the antler beam" means measurement from the lowest outside edge of the antler burr on a white-tailed deer over the outer curve to the most distant point of what is or appeares to be the main antler beam beginning at the place on the antler burr where the center line along the outer curve of the beam intersects the antler burr. Now Doc. it sure appears Ohio coniders the main beam to be from the burr to the tip.In Ohio all points are off the main beam. Pa says in our book of confusion that "the brow tine is the point immediately above the antler burr." So I guess if there is no traditional brow tine then you have to not count the first point immediatily out the main beam. I'm getting so confused Doc. I am just getting more mixed up than ever. No wonder so many youths are leaving hunting. Well said and I couldn't agree more !
|
RE: New Antler Restrictions 3 up law
2011/11/16 15:34:32
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: surffishn Big Tuna I could not agree more PEE AYE sucks.Since AR I have found atleast 10 bucks left in the woods.One winter after hunting season I watched two Bucks together several times.They looked like twins the left sides had A big Y and A long brow tine the right was A huge looking spike.I know these racks were 3.5 years or older.The base of antlers were huge.Except for A junior hunter they would never be legal.These scrub bucks are left year to year to breed. Sorry but AR's do not work.Unless you have complete control to manage land.That means shooting undesirable deer so they do not breed.I did not hunt PEE Aye last year first time since 1965 I was 12 then. I will be moving out of this state in A year or so.I used to support the PGC but saddly this state has the stupidest game laws I have yet to read.Here is A example they want kids to start hunting.My Grandsons live in NC one is 2.5 one will be 1 next week.I bought both of them there hunting and fishing license for life in NC.It cost $375 for each child.They can always YES ALWAYS hunt or fish in NC even if they change residency.Dose PEE Aye offer anything like this? We all know the answer. Instead you have WCO's looking for leads to arrest hunters on this web site.Thats about the most tastless thing I ever heard from A WCO.But hey its PEE AYE. PGC tries to make as much money from Fines and Anterless Tags as they can.This state is losing hunters faster than any other I wonder why? See YA in Ohio or WV. Go DEER HUNTING and Good LUCK! +1 !!!!!!!!!!
|