wayne c
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 3473
- Reward points: 0
- Status: offline
RE: Would You Take This Bet?
2011/05/09 18:06:07
(permalink)
Yeah, I found that interesting too deerfly. Seems lack of game definately has effect, though should only be common sense deducation i guess. But i also believe that this part is telling: "It's interesting to note that survey results indicate that hunters who have never hunted small game are more likely to become inactive or ex-hunters." Would suggest that those who based their hunting on things OTHER than small game (like DEER) have been more likely to quit. Gee wonder why that is?
|
bingsbaits
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 5035
- Reward points: 0
- Status: offline
RE: Would You Take This Bet?
2011/05/09 18:58:48
(permalink)
YADA YADA YADA.; Take your crap else where..;.;.;
"There is a pleasure in Angling that no one knows but the Angler himself". WB
|
wayne c
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 3473
- Reward points: 0
- Status: offline
RE: Would You Take This Bet?
2011/05/09 19:14:37
(permalink)
Blah, blah, blah.... Same to you.... .................. ;
post edited by wayne c - 2011/05/09 19:40:32
|
Esox_Hunter
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 2393
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2006/08/02 14:32:57
- Status: offline
RE: Would You Take This Bet?
2011/05/09 21:14:36
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: deerfly In the last 6 months ,how many of you PGC supporters started threads on this forum that were not about deer or deer habitat? I have started several which have been high jacked into deer wars debates. What a surprise, huh? Just about every deer hunting thread leads into a whine fest about the deer herd. It isn't hard to understand why there are so few deer hunting threads started down here. How many threads have you started that actually discuss hunting and not redundant DMP crap? For what it is worth I don't even come close to agreeing with everything the PGC does. I guess the difference is that I enjoy hunting too much to spend my life whining on the internet about the PGC and their policies. If I was as disappointed with the deer hunting as some here lead on for us to believe, I would just quit, period.
|
Ironhed
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 1892
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2001/11/07 19:10:08
- Status: offline
RE: Would You Take This Bet?
2011/05/09 21:38:48
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: bingsbaits Guess that's all on the back of the Moderater.; Why he lets this crap continue is a mystery to me. Hunting boards are not even worth reading anymore, Bu11sh1t in my book..;.; Let me solve that mystery... Although some folks boo-hoo and cry about various topics time and time and time again, there is nothing in the TOS that says they can't. If things get out of hand or continue to go in circles, the thread gets locked/deleted and we all move on. Period. Ironhed
|
eyesandgillz
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 4043
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2003/06/18 11:30:03
- Status: offline
RE: Would You Take This Bet?
2011/05/10 12:38:45
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: deerfly ere is another interesting quote from the PGN article. Most of you (61%) are hunting small game less. For those who aren't hunting small game as much as they used to, the main reasons are lack of game (39%), lack of time (21%) and age or health related issues (14%). It's interesting to note that survey results indicate that hunters who have never hunted small game are more likely to become inactive or ex-hunters. So, once again , the lack of game is the main reason hunters are quitting. Yeah, its amazing what they can glean from 23 respondents yet you two are the first to discount harvest estimates and population estimates based on 10's of thousands of actual deer field checks/harvest reports. Easy to see you only agree with the "data" that suits your needs. That's ok, I'll keep killing deer while you two stay on here all year long whining about not killing deer. If nothing else, it keeps things interesting. waaaaah waaaah waaaah...here's your binky!
|
deerfly
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 1271
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2010/05/03 16:06:32
- Status: offline
RE: Would You Take This Bet?
2011/05/10 13:35:03
(permalink)
Yeah, its amazing what they can glean from 23 respondents yet you two are the first to discount harvest estimates and population estimates based on 10's of thousands of actual deer field checks/harvest reports. Easy to see you only agree with the "data" that suits your needs. Wrong again. I don't question the harvest data and population estimates because they clearly show that the plan has failed to produce the predicted results. That's ok, I'll keep killing deer while you two stay on here all year long whining about not killing deer. You can't provide a single example where I whined about not killing a deer. That is simply your biased opinion and it is not based on anything I have posted. BTW, you also do a good job whining about those that enjoy debating these issues and high jacking threads, while contributing nothing of value to the subject being discussed.
|
retired guy
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 3107
- Reward points: 0
- Joined: 2010/08/26 15:49:55
- Location: ct-vacation place in Richland
- Status: offline
RE: Would You Take This Bet?
2011/05/10 16:42:36
(permalink)
Anything even remotely affiliated with the subject matter - like , Dja hear bout that Osama bum gettin whacked? - turns into the same old same old.
|
wayne c
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 3473
- Reward points: 0
- Status: offline
RE: Would You Take This Bet?
2011/05/10 16:44:16
(permalink)
"Yeah, its amazing what they can glean from 23 respondents yet you two are the first to discount harvest estimates and population estimates based on 10's of thousands of actual deer field checks/harvest reports." HUH?? Where did i ever say i had a problem with believing the harvest estimates? I actually DO believe them. And they are pathetic. Whining, and you dont even know what you are whining about...just that you dont like anyone besmirching the gameless commission failed plan...oh it doesnt matter what was or wasnt said...or if its valid or not..lmao. Just as long as your tears flow and your mouth runs i guess. lmao. That's ok, I'll keep killing deer while you two stay on here all year long whining about not killing deer. Directed at ME? ha ha ha. Im sure my hunting partners/crew would laugh their arses off if they could read this. lol. Apparently i cant kill deer. Even funnier still, youre a better hunter than me. lmao. Thats rich. Id expect a bigger buck in your avatar if that were the case. That is right around my minimum standards, and im archery only. So there you have it Mr. Bushman. lol. -btw, be careful over at greenlick. I hear those couple of 13 and 14 year olds that you spoke of tossing those pebbles in the water get pretty rough at times. lmao. Now if youre done with the personal snipes, anything of actual worth to add towards the actual topic? No? Didnt think so. Why should this thread be any different for you.
post edited by wayne c - 2011/05/10 17:16:12
|
wayne c
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 3473
- Reward points: 0
- Status: offline
RE: Would You Take This Bet?
2011/05/10 16:52:09
(permalink)
Anything even remotely affiliated with the subject matter - like , Dja hear bout that Osama bum gettin whacked? - turns into the same old same old. Um yeah, thats swell and all... But how about you go to one of THOSE threads (if you can find one) and whine there because THIS thread ISNT one of them. The discussion here was very much on the appropriate topic of the original post, until whiners started the same ol same ol.
|
bingsbaits
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 5035
- Reward points: 0
- Status: offline
RE: Would You Take This Bet?
2011/05/10 16:58:42
(permalink)
You would be an expert on that I'm sure...
"There is a pleasure in Angling that no one knows but the Angler himself". WB
|
wayne c
Pro Angler
- Total Posts : 3473
- Reward points: 0
- Status: offline
RE: Would You Take This Bet?
2011/05/10 17:02:01
(permalink)
Yeah, whatever you say. Looks like there may be a slight argument. Time to pile on some dung troll. lol.
post edited by wayne c - 2011/05/10 17:03:58
|