LDDpsu_fishSome TDS’er went to White House on a mission, mission failed.Good... I heard there's a pic floating around with a shirtless Dan Bongino kneeling over the f-wad in a trophy pose. (see the pic Crappie posted of him and the slobby buck) btw...are we allowed to like the FBI again or are they still a compromised political wing of the democratic party? I just want to know how to feel.
psu_fishSome TDS’er went to White House on a mission, mission failed.
bingsbaitsDoes it taste sweet or salty ??
crappiefisherHey Tim, Lake Porktown is at about the perfect water level right now. Maybe "the greatest of all time", "never seen anything like it before", "best ever" 🦫🎣
psu_fishLDDpsu_fishSome TDS’er went to White House on a mission, mission failed.Good... I heard there's a pic floating around with a shirtless Dan Bongino kneeling over the f-wad in a trophy pose. (see the pic Crappie posted of him and the slobby buck) btw...are we allowed to like the FBI again or are they still a compromised political wing of the democratic party? I just want to know how to feel. Seeing that the AG and FBI director announced arrests, prolly not. But you can keep Coping.
PorktownAnyone slamming any beaver up there?
JM2danoJM2danoJM2LADWP, which serves the Palisades, is tied into the State Water Project. In fact they get most of their water from the SWP. The part of the Fed aqueduct your friend in referring to gets its water from the west slope of the central Sierras, not the delta. Although Trump does not appear to be an expert on CA’s water infrastructure, he certainly seems to understand it much better than both you and your friend combined. I Forgot about this. My apologies. We're both so close to agreeing. With two different water projects + dams it can get confusing.CVP vs SWP. CVP is federal controlled. SWP is State controlled. But then releases were not just 1 point ......including 2 dam releases that serve the CVP.Hope this clears up my initial position:https://hydrowonk.com/blo...2015-water-deliveries/ https://upload.wikimedia...._valley_project-01.png If close to agreeing means, you are admitting that you were posting claims that were not true to further a narrative. Then yes, we may be close to agreeing.,No. I was just being polite and giving you an out. Unreal. Through out our whole exchange you have demonstrated over and over a lack of understanding of what you were talking about, and now you’re being polite and giving me an out. You’re joking right?... It’s got to be a joke.
danoJM2danoJM2LADWP, which serves the Palisades, is tied into the State Water Project. In fact they get most of their water from the SWP. The part of the Fed aqueduct your friend in referring to gets its water from the west slope of the central Sierras, not the delta. Although Trump does not appear to be an expert on CA’s water infrastructure, he certainly seems to understand it much better than both you and your friend combined. I Forgot about this. My apologies. We're both so close to agreeing. With two different water projects + dams it can get confusing.CVP vs SWP. CVP is federal controlled. SWP is State controlled. But then releases were not just 1 point ......including 2 dam releases that serve the CVP.Hope this clears up my initial position:https://hydrowonk.com/blo...2015-water-deliveries/ https://upload.wikimedia...._valley_project-01.png If close to agreeing means, you are admitting that you were posting claims that were not true to further a narrative. Then yes, we may be close to agreeing.,No. I was just being polite and giving you an out.
JM2danoJM2LADWP, which serves the Palisades, is tied into the State Water Project. In fact they get most of their water from the SWP. The part of the Fed aqueduct your friend in referring to gets its water from the west slope of the central Sierras, not the delta. Although Trump does not appear to be an expert on CA’s water infrastructure, he certainly seems to understand it much better than both you and your friend combined. I Forgot about this. My apologies. We're both so close to agreeing. With two different water projects + dams it can get confusing.CVP vs SWP. CVP is federal controlled. SWP is State controlled. But then releases were not just 1 point ......including 2 dam releases that serve the CVP.Hope this clears up my initial position:https://hydrowonk.com/blo...2015-water-deliveries/ https://upload.wikimedia...._valley_project-01.png If close to agreeing means, you are admitting that you were posting claims that were not true to further a narrative. Then yes, we may be close to agreeing.,
danoJM2LADWP, which serves the Palisades, is tied into the State Water Project. In fact they get most of their water from the SWP. The part of the Fed aqueduct your friend in referring to gets its water from the west slope of the central Sierras, not the delta. Although Trump does not appear to be an expert on CA’s water infrastructure, he certainly seems to understand it much better than both you and your friend combined. I Forgot about this. My apologies. We're both so close to agreeing. With two different water projects + dams it can get confusing.CVP vs SWP. CVP is federal controlled. SWP is State controlled. But then releases were not just 1 point ......including 2 dam releases that serve the CVP.Hope this clears up my initial position:https://hydrowonk.com/blo...2015-water-deliveries/ https://upload.wikimedia...._valley_project-01.png
JM2LADWP, which serves the Palisades, is tied into the State Water Project. In fact they get most of their water from the SWP. The part of the Fed aqueduct your friend in referring to gets its water from the west slope of the central Sierras, not the delta. Although Trump does not appear to be an expert on CA’s water infrastructure, he certainly seems to understand it much better than both you and your friend combined.
