And don’t think that it doesn’t go deeper than not wanting the possibility of bad meat being served. It is an anti hunting tactic that thinks if hunters who don’t eat the meat and donate it will stop hunting if the donation option isn’t available.
Think that train of thought is way out there? It is, but don’t put that past the Cecil crowd to do.
A few years ago there was a piece on 60 Minutes about ranches in Texas that raised Scimitar Ibex for hunting. Whether one agrees with high fences or not (keep in mind two things — 1) this is agriculture, not free range hunting and 2) these high fences are 10’s of thousands of acres), the species was on the verge of extinction and these ranches saved them. From there some were exported back to their native range in Africa, where they have been re-established.
They had on an anti and pointed out the success of the program. The response was it would have been better had they gone extinct than to be saved and some of them be hunted.