yes in all it is not good news for us regular Joe Dirt‘s..
db you are correct, it was never pfr but it was a place that allowed fishing access. Now I do not believe that access will be allowed without a price.. so did we possibly lose something we never had ? I do believe so..
Sadly there are enough folks willing to support privatized places to enjoy the outdoors..
If such support was to cease then Id have to expect those such places would too..
I will say, I was a part of the problem.. I supported the dsr when it was first enacted.. At that point it seemed ok to have somewhere that was reasonably priced ($10.00-salmon,$5.00-chrome) then things as they always do increase their cost.. It seemed that still it was a "deal" at $250.00 for a season. Finally the cost became so exorbitant that it seemed I was only lining the pockets of the already wealthy and exempting those of us regular Joe Dirt’s, so I chose no longer to support them..
Honestly I think the politicians , representatives , would prefer privatized fishing.. They no longer have to deal with trash, enforcement and complaints from others.. The theory is , "let the owners deal with it" while they(state) still collect revenue from license sales.
Lucky is correct, express your thoughts through propaganda.. Attend public meetings, don't support privatized access and if need be boycott the entire fishery for 1 year..
I know that sounds like a stretch but just think what would happen if there wasn’t a sole standing in the river for 1 season..
Obviously that would never happen but if folks really want change then they need to make change happen..
sorry for my 2 cents:
Signed:
Joe Dirt..