Handicapped pier on 20 mile.

Author
indsguiz
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 5835
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2005/03/24 01:59:54
  • Status: offline
2019/04/22 10:25:57 (permalink)

Handicapped pier on 20 mile.

Gentlemen,
      I recently journeyed back up to Erie, (after 5 years) with my grandsons, and I was VERY disappointed with the way the handicapped fishing platform was made on 20 mile.  I am handicapped, confined to a wheelchair, (lost my left leg), but I wanted to try to fish for steel again.  
      The design and execution of the "tower" is not good from the handicapped point of view.
      First, the thing is about 10 feet above the water?  Since most steelhead fishing is a matter of drifting a small fly or lure toward fish it requires light line and some degree of accuracy and with the wind coming off the lake that is almost impossible from 10 feet in the air.  Secondly, the guard rail.  I am a big man and even I had difficulty reaching over the rail to position the lure even close to where it needed to be. Hate to see some kid trying to use it. 
      2d Point:  Since the platform is wayy above the water, it requires a heavy line to get the lure down, and to hoist a fish (if magically one is hooked) all the way up to the platform.  I haven't seen a whole lot of 15 foot long nets that can be used by a person in a wheelchair when they have to reach over a 3 foot tall railing.
      My basic conclusion is that the platform was designed by a bunch of people who were NOT handicapped, to fit a bunch of rules, devised by people who have never dealt with a handicap.  Why couldn't the platform be made as a ramp, leading down to about 2 feet above the mean water level with a 12" rail?  There is no rail on the wall at Walnut, or by the lagoon on Walnut.  Most of us with disabilities know our limits and wouldn't go down on a ramp during a flood, or climb over anything.
     In conclusion:  The "tower" was a waste of money, as built, and is really a waste of money as designed and built.  A much better use of money would have been to improve the falls on Manchester, to allow better fish migration. Or to construct a low pier at Trout Run.
 
       Just my opinion.
post edited by indsguiz - 2019/04/22 10:31:41

Illegitimis Non carborundum
#1

3 Replies Related Threads

    BeenThereDoneThat.
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 8302
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2014/05/14 07:30:39
    • Location: A Field or A Float
    • Status: offline
    Re: Handicapped pier on 20 mile. 2019/04/22 11:26:26 (permalink)
    Indys your opinion is spot on. No individual having any experience in fishing, let alone disability's, would design or build such facilities. Such a shame and such a waste of money.

    Give a man a fish and you will feed him for a day; teach a man to fish and you will feed him for a life time. ~Anne Isabella Thackeray Ritchie (1837–1919)~
     
     
     
      Old fisherman never die; we just smell that way. 
     
    #2
    Meatball
    Expert Angler
    • Total Posts : 468
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2005/03/06 09:32:15
    • Status: offline
    Re: Handicapped pier on 20 mile. 2019/04/23 17:46:34 (permalink)
    I agree indsguiz, I saw it. I saw capable people fishing from it. It is a total waste of money. There is no way you could "catch" anything but a bluegill from it, if you were standing and leaning over the rail.

    "I feel sorry for the people who don't drink. When they wake up, that is the best they are going to feel all day"
                     -- Frank Sinatra
    #3
    workcanwait....
    Expert Angler
    • Total Posts : 668
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2013/03/01 18:56:24
    • Status: offline
    Re: Handicapped pier on 20 mile. 2019/04/24 09:33:54 (permalink)
    Yeah I was disappointed when I saw the one at Rick Road this one sounds just as bad or worse...WCW
    #4
    Jump to: