Snow

Page: < 12 Showing page 2 of 2
Author
RSB
Expert Angler
  • Total Posts : 932
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2010/08/11 22:55:57
  • Status: offline
RE: Snow 2011/02/12 19:10:55 (permalink)
ORIGINAL: deerfly

That is what is so crazy and frustrating about how our herd is being managed. The PGC only consider the habitat value of forested habitat and completely discount the habitat value of farm land. The result is they assign a carrying capacity to areas that are 90% forested, that are 3 times higher than areas with mixed farmlands and wood lots.

 
That is no longer a true statement. Back when deer were being managed based on an estimated over winter deer population and the amount of forest habitat in each of three age classifications you are correct that deer were managed only on the value of the forest habitat with a zero management density for non-forested habitat.
 
That all changed with the implementation of the 2003-2007 Deer Management Plan. When it went to the new management plan deer densities were no longer expressed n deer per forested square and included deer densities for ALL landmass and habitat types. Deer management was also changed at that time to being based on the health of both the deer and the forest health.
 
By using those two criteria, instead of the old deer per forested square mile method, the health of the deer was certainly better where they had farmland habitat. The forests were also in better condition where deer were doing a higher percentage of their feeding on farm fields and crops. Where farmlands provided for both better deer and forest health there was not as much effort to reduce the existing deer populations unless it was recommended by the Citizen Advisory Councils based on the human conflict side of the newer deer management objectives.
 
But, the fact is that since 2003 deer most certainly have been managed to include ALL available habitat types and conditions.
 
This is all I am going to say concerning this topic in this thread since it is clearly off topic. If you want to discuss it further you can start a new thread to deal with this topic.
 
R.S. Bodenhorn
#31
deerfly
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 1271
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2010/05/03 16:06:32
  • Status: offline
RE: Snow 2011/02/12 20:00:30 (permalink)
That all changed with the implementation of the 2003-2007 Deer Management Plan. When it went to the new management plan deer densities were no longer expressed n deer per forested square and included deer densities for ALL landmass and habitat types. Deer management was also changed at that time to being based on the health of both the deer and the forest health.


In 2003 the PGC claimed the habitat in 2G could support 15 DPSM, but they reduced the herd in 2G to just 8 DPSM. Can you explian why they reduced the herd in 2G to 40% below the carrying capacity of the forested habitat in 2G.


y using those two criteria, instead of the old deer per forested square mile method, the health of the deer was certainly better where they had farmland habitat. The forests were also in better condition where deer were doing a higher percentage of their feeding on farm fields and crops. Where farmlands provided for both better deer and forest health there was not as much effort to reduce the existing deer populations unless it was recommended by the Citizen Advisory Councils based on the human conflict side of the newer deer management objectives.


That is absolutely not true and proves beyond all doubt that you don't know what you are talking about. WMU 5 C , which had the second harvest harvest rate in DPSM had the worst regeneration rate of any WMU in the state even though it is located in an area with some of the highest quality of farm land in the state.
#32
noodle one
Novice Angler
  • Total Posts : 53
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2008/09/01 19:55:17
  • Status: offline
RE: Snow 2011/02/12 20:06:06 (permalink)
I won't worry to much about turkeys, they can and will roost in trees for up to a week or longer without feeding. When they do start feeding they can feed on just about anything and every thing and survive. The big worry for turkeys is they need gravel to digest there food. If they can't get to the gravel through the ice crust, they can eat all the food they want and still die with a full crop with no gravel to digest the food.
#33
RSB
Expert Angler
  • Total Posts : 932
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2010/08/11 22:55:57
  • Status: offline
RE: Snow 2011/02/12 21:36:59 (permalink)
ORIGINAL: noodle one

I won't worry to much about turkeys, they can and will roost in trees for up to a week or longer without feeding. When they do start feeding they can feed on just about anything and every thing and survive. The big worry for turkeys is they need gravel to digest there food. If they can't get to the gravel through the ice crust, they can eat all the food they want and still die with a full crop with no gravel to digest the food.

 
You are perfectly correct. We know turkeys can sit in a tree with no food, other than a few buds they can get out of the tree, for up to two weeks and still survive provided they aren’t forced to fly out of that tree. Once they fly though they have to find some food to replace the energy they are expending. That is one of nature’s survival methods for the wild turkey. It is also one of the reasons we hate to see snowmobiles, ATVs and even people walking or driving into the prime wintering grounds during some winters when both deer and turkeys are locked into the wintering grounds habitats.
 
Everyone worries about the turkeys when we get some crust but the turkeys love the crust. The crust gives turkeys great mobility and as long as turkeys have mobility they will find all of the food and grit they need. They will find all kinds of seeds on top of the crusted snow that will sustain them and they can find enough grit in the stream edges, spring seeps or plowed and cindered roads to fulfill their winter survival needs. What really hurts turkeys is deep powdery snow with cold weather. First of all they expend too much energy pushing through deep snow for the limited food they can find. Then they get into the spring seeps or open creek areas looking for grit and food and get wet. After they are wet and start pushing though the deep snow they start forming ice balls under their tail until they can no longer get up into a tree to roost. Once that happens they are more likely to either die of exposure or become a predation mortality.
 
I have seen several sets of bobcat tracks working the areas with the most turkeys right now. I am sure they will get any turkey that isn’t healthy or paying attention to its surroundings. I haven’t seen any evidence of a capture yet but the snow is so deep I’m not walking too far through the woods checking for signs of predation either. All in all I am not seeing any signs of any problems at all for the turkeys this winter.
 
The deer are just now, within the past week, starting to come down off the ridges and plateaus so they are all still in good shape too. In fact a lot of the wintering grounds still don’t have the deer locked down from what I could tell in my patrols of the areas today. There are almost no deer tracks on the ridges right now, with lots of tracks in the bottoms but the deer are still remaining hidden during the day so things haven’t got bad yet. If these crusted snows don’t linger on or we get bunch more snow on top of what is already out there the deer in this area should be just fine. Hopefully the warming trends they are predicting will open things up enough the deer move back out of the wintering grounds.
 
R.S. Bodenhorn 
#34
wayne c
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 3473
  • Reward points: 0
  • Status: offline
RE: Snow 2011/02/12 22:06:48 (permalink)
"I have seen several sets of bobcat tracks working the areas with the most turkeys right now."



Im seeing the same with bobcat in one area i hunt and have walked several times in the last several weeks. If i walk the entire property and the turks arent in there, but are on the surrounding properties and havent left tracks... I havent been seeing the cat tracks. Every time the birds are in there its almost a guarantee the cat tracks are there, and usually going right in among the turkey sign. No sign of kill though this year. Found one last season though. Wasnt snow at the time, but appeared to be the work of a cat, none of the bones were chewed and the meat had been licked from the bone except for the white connective tissues. Dont mind sharin' a few birds. Those b'cats are some awesome, gorgeous predators.

As for the deer in our area, have been seeing a few. Seem to be doing pretty well, The snow has come and gone a couple times, but not laid really that long deep. Those deer ive seen seem to be nicely plump, and i believe its because they are still finding good reserves of acorns judging by all the digging still going on around many of the red oaks.


post edited by wayne c - 2011/02/12 22:15:17
#35
S-10
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 5185
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2005/01/21 21:22:55
  • Status: offline
RE: Snow 2011/02/13 07:34:01 (permalink)
Everyone worries about the turkeys when we get some crust but the turkeys love the crust

I always have more action on my feeders when the snow stiffens up than I do when it's deep and powdery. There are some hemlocks a half mile below me along a creek bottom with some mixed hardwoods and they live in them until they can move around on top of the snow. There is also enough folks feeding the critters in the area that we have little winter mortality on anything other than what the coyotes and fisher get.
#36
retired guy
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 3107
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2010/08/26 15:49:55
  • Location: ct-vacation place in Richland
  • Status: offline
RE: Snow 2011/02/13 09:11:25 (permalink)
2/12/11-   Was looking out the kitchen window here in CT this afternoon and was VERY happy to see half dozen or so walking on the crust and eating brush- guess they will do ok now that the crust can hold them up.
2/13/11--  Went for a ride in the Eastern hills today and saw deer out on the crust  in brushy spots everywhere- seem to be doing quite well-cant believe it after the weather- never underestimate mother nature...
post edited by retired guy - 2011/02/13 17:55:48
#37
Page: < 12 Showing page 2 of 2
Jump to: