SilverKype
Posts: 3811
Joined: 1/24/2005 From: State Status: online
|
Regardless, I see it happening eventually, indefinitely. But it shouldn't happen with a vote from legislators when some don't even know what a crossbow is. Politics shouldn't override science. I think it needs to be proven our deer numbers can handle it (which I don't think they can now), ratio's remain balanced, and no season should be altered because of it. Something has to change.. more deer, less hunters, shorter seasons, etc... Biologist Mike Tonkovich of Ohio states .. every 400,000 rifle only hunters in a state, will add 160,000 crossbow hunters. With our 630,000 rifle only hunters, that 252,000 additional hunters in the woods for archery. At a .4 harvest rate (our average per year), that's 100,800 additional deer harvested annually. In Ohio, the resource can handle that, because their supply of deer is booming and they have had record harvests the past few years. We, on the other hand, have had the lowest in decades. I happen to think my area is managed perfectly. Numbers, ratio's, age structure, etc... although there are lots of no deer guys. Adding crossbows may put a new definition to "deer wars." I encourage each of you to write to your reps and legislators. All of my personal opinions of xbows aside, the introduction of new hunters is great, but only if we got the deer to do it. We were blessed with a windy, rainy, foggy first day of rifle last year. Dump 6 inches of snow for the first day this year ... well, yikes! Now if they decided to bring them in and started with a 1 week season for crossbows, that was concurrent with the existing archery season, I think I could live with that. Funny thing is MM, xbows can be used in the two week inline season statewide, just not for antlered deer. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
_____________________________
It's hard to beat a Ross.
|