|
*commander* -> RE: Opening day of walleye results (5/10/2008 7:30:25 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: coolerfull1
Maybe this wasn't the best way to approach this, but of course these were trout. Some dam nice ones if I may say so myself. The camera dosen't do them justice. But oh well, just another plate of pelletheads. Anyhow, my point was, and maybe I should make this it's own thread, but how many times have I heard about walleyes, perch, crappie, and bluegill tasting better than trout? A million times. I actually did a taste test two years in a row with all these fish and both times trout came out #1 by three people and the other ones where out of the ordered desired in the first place by the other taste testers. I think I know what's happening. It's more prestigious to catch walleye, big bluegill, crappie, and perch. So to say they taste better gives people the impression you can catch them when meanwhile you have no luck at all fishing for them. I proved myself by catching them and making them and I proved everybody was full of crap with the taste test.
if you go out and catch perch, bluegill, crappie and walleye, i'm sure youll have no problem trading them for all the steelhead you want.
a taste test 2 years in a row as in a "fish lineup" where you lined up all these species of fish and people chose the trout? "George Costanza" did the same thing on "Seinfeld" but with candy bars and all of the candy bars were "Twix." are you sure all the fish werent trout?
|
|
|
|