SmallieKiller
Posts: 3512
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: D-nymph quote:
ORIGINAL: steelheadman28 I saw a different article in a different paper a while ago. I forget which paper it was, but supposedly he stocked the fish himself from the stocking truck. Im pretty sure thats what one paper said I have to look. I dont think it should be a record. I'd have to agree. So, the state raises state record size fish, stocks them in the creek to be caught a couple weeks laters, and they are considered a record? Sounds extremely artificial to me. Yeap, I mentioned this on the southwest board the day of and got flamed for it. I don't see how the state can raise a record fish in the hatchery, then put it in the creek and say sure thing, that's a record. And people can save that "then there'd be no records because all fish are hatchery fish in PA", because that's bs. Bass aren't stocked at 11 pounds, they don't put 20 lb steelhead in Walnut creek in November. Also the "he still had to catch it" argument is pretty weak too. It's a hatchery trout and it has to eat. A fish that size and that color stands out like a sore thumb and before the end of thatday, someone was going to catch that fish. If that was in a lake and I could justify that perhaps it's been in there since it was 11 inches, I would be more ok with it. I just feel it's a little cheapened due to the circumstances. Is it a great catch? Sure. Would I be elated and plaster my picture all over the place? Yes I would. Would I apply for a record? Probably. But I'm disappointed in the commission for putting that fish in a creek. It should be in a aquarium somewhere or should of been stocked last summer or fall.
_____________________________
Dorothy Mantooth is a saint!
|