FishUSA.com Forums
Forums Home Search Photo Gallery Calendar Policies Logout Old Boards FishUSA.com Tackle Shop My Profile My Forums My Subscriptions My Address Book My Inbox Member List RSS News Feed
Log In      

RE: Baitcaster

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [General and Speciality Fishing Boards] >> Conventional Fishing & Tackle >> RE: Baitcaster Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Baitcaster - 5/14/2008 10:01:58 AM   
casts_by_fly

 

Posts: 2450
Joined: 10/18/2000
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mikelravy

That still leaves the question open as to why anyone would want to use 6lb line on a baitcaster.  I just can't see it.



mikelravy,

My dad gets tennis elbow in his right elbow really bad from working 25 years of construction.  A spinning rod makes it alot worse as he holds a spinning rod in his right arm.  I built him a really light bait caster and put a chronarch on it 2 years ago so he could fish unweighted tubes and light finesse lures that he'd normally only be able to fish on a spinning rod.  The rod is spooled with 8 lb, but could as easily handle 6.  It will throw 3/8 oz lures on the top end and I wouldn't put more than 10-12 lb test on it.  It also throw's the little rattletraps and cranks well.

That's what you want a light bait caster for.

Thanks,
Rick

(in reply to mikelravy)
Post #: 31
RE: Baitcaster - 5/14/2008 1:32:26 PM   
BigOlPigs

 

Posts: 19
Joined: 4/9/2008
Status: offline
Ordered a rod/reel combo from Bass Pro.  This is it.  < Hope the link worked.  It's a Quantum KVD series.  They are on sale right now.  It was $160 in the catalog but they are going for $140 online for rod and reel.  Can't wait to get it and start landing them BIG OL PIGS!  Thanks for all the info guys.  I think alot of people shy away from baitcasters because they don't know enough or don't want to learn but just reading this thread would help them out.  Thanks again!

(in reply to jlh42581)
Post #: 32
RE: Baitcaster - 5/17/2008 4:28:24 PM   
cuchef

 

Posts: 32
Joined: 12/15/2007
From: Ithaca, NY
Status: offline
I used to fish strictly baitcasting reels.  I learned when I was a kid...my father was a patient man.  I remember quantum marketing an ultra-light baitcasting reel for line weights 2-6 pounds.  I don't think that there was much of a draw for them, I havn't seen them since.  This would have been in the early nineties. You said you flyfish, imagine a fly reel with a really piss poor drag system with a lot of start up inertia that sheds line when a fish runs.  That is what you are trying to avoid and essentially cause every time you cast a baitcasting reel.  Do with your thumb when casting a baitcasting rod what you do with your palm when a fish is stripping line with a fly rig only use your thumb and not the palm of your hand.  Hope that helps.
Ryan

Just thought of something else.  When learning I had that spool tension pretty tight that got the basics and timing of spooling down.  I still got backlashes though not as severe.  Over time I used little to no spool tension all done with the thumb.  This increased casting distance.

< Message edited by cuchef -- 5/17/2008 4:44:39 PM >

(in reply to BigOlPigs)
Post #: 33
RE: Baitcaster - 5/29/2008 8:47:47 AM   
dozer

 

Posts: 41
Joined: 3/20/2006
Status: online
dont try to cast a a cross a lake ,it dont work. sit in a chair an push the button,watch the line  an use the thunb i learned on the old casting reels. you can  cast worms an light stuff on casting reals .but it takes a little time 

(in reply to jlh42581)
Post #: 34
RE: Baitcaster - 6/3/2008 8:46:55 PM   
The Sack

 

Posts: 12
Joined: 2/26/2008
From: Gibsonia
Status: offline
This is a little late BigOlPigs, but Cabellas has a special on the Quantum Energy PT baitcaster reels if you buy it online...$99.00. It is usually $189.00. I don't think you could get a better reel for that price. The tour edition is also marked down from $259 to $139. I have 2 of these as well and love them as well.

< Message edited by The Sack -- 6/3/2008 8:49:47 PM >

(in reply to BigOlPigs)
Post #: 35
RE: Baitcaster - 6/5/2008 12:32:20 PM   
STEELYS MANFISH

 

Posts: 77
Joined: 2/4/2008
Status: offline
checked out the sale on quantum energy pt baitcaster. al the 6.3:1 are sold out. why is that? there still are 7.0:1 reels left. If I understand this correctly I will get seven revolutions of the spool to 1 crank. Is this to fast for lures? Are they not good? I have a 6.6 ugly stic med action. can I use this 7.0:1 on this rod. advantages vs disadvantages. i am currently using a dick's special that only cost me 40 for the rod and reel which is also a baitcaster. Am beginning to get the feel for casting and have been catching bass with it. any help would be appreciated. I realize I asked alot of questions. any info would help. Basically Im just wondering why everyone prefers the 6.3:1 and what would be appropriate on the ugly stick.

(in reply to The Sack)
Post #: 36
RE: Baitcaster - 6/5/2008 3:35:34 PM   
plnoldrick

 

Posts: 370
Joined: 9/3/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: STEELYS MANFISH

checked out the sale on quantum energy pt baitcaster. al the 6.3:1 are sold out. why is that? there still are 7.0:1 reels left. If I understand this correctly I will get seven revolutions of the spool to 1 crank. Is this to fast for lures? Are they not good? I have a 6.6 ugly stic med action. can I use this 7.0:1 on this rod. advantages vs disadvantages. i am currently using a dick's special that only cost me 40 for the rod and reel which is also a baitcaster. Am beginning to get the feel for casting and have been catching bass with it. any help would be appreciated. I realize I asked alot of questions. any info would help. Basically Im just wondering why everyone prefers the 6.3:1 and what would be appropriate on the ugly stick.



7.0:1 is considered a "burner" reel. they are nice for flipping and pitchin to reel up the slack quik or burning spinnerbaits.

6.3:1 is considered an all around retrieve while something like 5.0:1 would be for crankbaits.

there isnt technically anything wrong with buying a 7.0:1 and using it to fish big wobbling cranks but you'll have to slow down your retrieve alot. and vice versa there isnt anything wrong with buying a 5.0:1 and trying to burn spinnerbaits back to the boat.

the only problem i personally see and consider a big one is it's easier to speed up then slow down your retrieve. thus you might find it hard to fish a texas rig low and slow with a burner reel as opposed to something of a lesser gear ratio.

(in reply to STEELYS MANFISH)
Post #: 37
RE: Baitcaster - 6/5/2008 4:03:15 PM   
meatball1977

 

Posts: 90
Joined: 4/9/2008
From: hillsville,pa
Status: offline
I use my quantum tour,7:0:1 for everything.I just love it.

(in reply to plnoldrick)
Post #: 38
RE: Baitcaster - 6/6/2008 11:02:40 AM   
casts_by_fly

 

Posts: 2450
Joined: 10/18/2000
Status: offline
it is easier for me to slow down than speed up.  I'll take a 7.0 over a 5.2 any day.  More important though is to look at the line retrieved per revolution.  You can have a faster speed ratio with a slower intake when you use a smaller spool.  Some extra fast burner reels don't take in line any faster than a plain old 6.1:1.

thanks
rick

(in reply to meatball1977)
Post #: 39
RE: Baitcaster - 6/9/2008 8:47:54 PM   
The Sack

 

Posts: 12
Joined: 2/26/2008
From: Gibsonia
Status: offline
Steelys,

I have both the 6.3 and 7 to 1 reels, . Honestly, I really prefer the 7 to 1 reel. Sometimes you may need to slow down your retrieve based on the lure/situation you are fishing but this is something your going to do anyway. For slow fishing soft plastics in and around cover, you can't beat it. It really lets you power the fish to the boat before he has a chance to wind you around any standing cover or dive deeper into the lillies and hydrilla. True, it can be fast, but its made that way, and it is not difficult to control at all. I must say, the quantum pt tour edition casts beutifully and the braking system really helps to eliminate backlashes. 95% of the battle with any baitcaster is just learning how to adjust the spool tension properly when you change tackle. The brakes are just a super fine tune. I rarely change mine unless it's really windy or I'm using a very light bait. As for your ugly stick...If thats your rod of choice then go with it. I prefer a stiffer rod with faster action myself but thats me. Hope this helps.

Sack

(in reply to STEELYS MANFISH)
Post #: 40
RE: Baitcaster - 6/13/2008 8:55:21 AM   
STEELYS MANFISH

 

Posts: 77
Joined: 2/4/2008
Status: offline
thanks sack. I definitely appreciate the info provided. The 7 sounds pretty good to me especially considering the lillies and other areas I like to fish. The 7 will pull 31 inches per crank but it sounds like I should be able slow down my retrieve depending on lure selection. The ugly stic will have to work until I can afford to match the reel with something better. Thanks again.

(in reply to The Sack)
Post #: 41
RE: Baitcaster - 6/19/2008 6:46:29 PM   
The Sack

 

Posts: 12
Joined: 2/26/2008
From: Gibsonia
Status: offline
No problem. All it takes to get good is practice. Luckily, that requires fishing...

(in reply to STEELYS MANFISH)
Post #: 42
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [General and Speciality Fishing Boards] >> Conventional Fishing & Tackle >> RE: Baitcaster Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages              Hot Topic w/ New Messages              Locked w/ New Messages
No New Messages              Hot Topic w/o New Messages              Locked w/o New Messages


Forums Home Search Photo Gallery Calendar Policies Logout Old Boards FishUSA.com Tackle Shop My Profile My Forums My Subscriptions My Address Book My Inbox Member List RSS News Feed
   

0.141