RE: 2007/2008 deer harvest (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Hunting Boards] >> Big Game Hunting



Message


dpms -> RE: 2007/2008 deer harvest (4/4/2008 3:37:02 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlh42581

Are you guys done pulling your tampons out yet? Or is there still some cotton in there?

1: The deer herd is lower then it was.
2: It aint coming back without seroius reform.
3: Genetics DO play a role.
4: The deer were never starving, which is why we have crop damage.
5: The PA Deer Commission doesnt give a rats ass about you or your opinion.
6: Less Doe's DOES = Less bucks... not rocket science.
7: Tragic accidents from deer are few and far between, lay off the booze and the smokes before you worry about that.
8: Antler stew sucks.
9: There are nicer bucks in the woods.
10: You prob wont kill one because you dont have private land.


Now, cant we just drop this, dont any of you worry about hunting anything else. How about lets bitch about the fact theres virtually no where to hunt pheasants but a preserve. The grouse population is shot and kids dont want to hunt cause they dont see deer. End of story!


[sm=battle.gif]



1.  Deer management goal met
2.  Should stay at current levels. Herd stabilization.
3.  They do.  Ours are fine.
4.  Lack of browse so the deer eat the crops.  Too many deer.
5.  They do.  Citizens advisory committees.  You could join one.
6.  Herd reduction.  Goal met.
7.  Any reduction in deer/vehicle collisions is good.  Is your next?
8.  It does.  Shoot a doe instead if it tastes better.
9.  Yes there are.
10  Pa. has some of the best public land deer hunting in the country.

Blame the demise of the farm for the lack of pheasants.  Grouse numbers are cyclical and they are down for sure.  Kids will hunt if mom or dad has passion for the sport and doesn't whine about years past.





S-10 -> RE: 2007/2008 deer harvest (4/4/2008 4:11:22 PM)

Why drop it? Apparently we all have too much time on our hands or we wouldn't be on here in the first place. If we can't hunt at least we can talk hunting.[;)] DPMS- I'll have to find the origin of the 80% quote. I wrote the quote down but not the source. I think it was one of the hearings. It stands to reason since there are the same amount of hunters, same areas to hunt and same length of season that approx same % bucks would be harvested. To clairfy, they said approx 80% of legal bucks and not 80% of total bucks.---------NOW-----3. Many would disagree-----4. Deer are like people, they eat what tastes good and crops have more protein than sticks.-----. 5. Why join, the president of the Commissioners publically stated that they would manage the wildlife as they saw fit in spite of the recommendations of the CAC.--------7. Carefull what you say. There would be zero deer/vehicle accidents if there were no deer. No need for those nasty guns either.[:o]-----10. According to the forester in charge of ANF there are 12 DPSM in the forest. Take a look at the aerial surveys on the state forests. Aside from Silvers secret spot and a few others much of it appears to suck also. Read the reports from the Kinzua Coop. The states public land has some of the best hunting areas but not the best areas to hunt successfully.




jlh42581 -> RE: 2007/2008 deer harvest (4/4/2008 4:36:40 PM)

I just wanted to stir you guys up a little bit. I think its funny.

I dont really have any gripes about any of it.




dpms -> RE: 2007/2008 deer harvest (4/4/2008 5:15:20 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: S-10

To clairfy, they said approx 80% of legal bucks and not 80% of total bucks.

5. Why join, the president of the Commissioners publically stated that they would manage the wildlife as they saw fit in spite of the recommendations of the CAC.

10. According to the forester in charge of ANF there are 12 DPSM in the forest.


I was wondering if it was the percentage of legal bucks, not total bucks.  No need to look it up.[;)] 

I participated in a CAC for unit 2A in the SW.  I was contacted by a member for that committee and filled out a survey.  All of the findings are to be presented to the commissioners, good or bad.  It is a worthwhile process for anyone that is interested.  That the CAC exists is a step in the right direction for input from all sides.

As for public land hunting.  Pa. has much more than most whitetail states and 12dpsm is not bad.  I would bet that other states with smaller tracts of public land, the pressure is more intense than here in Pa.  Just speculating on that.




S-10 -> RE: 2007/2008 deer harvest (4/4/2008 5:35:12 PM)

(12 DPSM is not bad)  = 3 adult doe---3 doe fawns---3 buck fawns---2  1-1/2 year old bucks---1  2-1/2 year old buck. And that's with a 1 to 1 ratio. Probably isn't that exact way in real life but it gives the buck hunter something to think about. One, maybe two legal deer to compete for.




duncsdad -> RE: 2007/2008 deer harvest (4/6/2008 8:43:44 AM)

Good discussion gents.

One stat clean-up however, and then, a question.

In round numbers it is agreed that there are about 900,000 hunters in PA and that about 300,000 deer were harvested -- no matter the accuracy or in accuracy of the data and how it was collected.

This would, on the face of it, appear that 1 out of 3 hunters harvested a deer, or, to look at it another way, 2 out of 3 failed to harvest a deer.

However, the round 900,000 license figure is backtags and the 300,000 is harvested deer that may be more than one deer per backtag with the possibility of a buck and doe or multiple doe with bonus tags.  So the 1 of 3 or 2 of 3 figures are skewed -- one back tag is harvesting more than one deer, in some cases many more than one, while other backtags are not harvesting any deer.

This would move the figure on harvest success somewhere nearer 1 of 4 successful and 3 out of 4 unsuccessful.  (Realistically, the numbers would fall in between.)

So the question is, how many average, as defined by the 3-day gun hunter, hunters are going to keep going at it when 3 out of 4 of them are not harvesting a deer?

This year was a prime example with the weather.  I know a lot of hunters that basically got drowned the 1st day and they were done for the season since 1/3 of it was wiped out.  An argument can be made that these people are not "real" hunters, but the simple truth is they provide more license dollars and matching federal funds that those that are out there all the time, without which the PGC does not exist.

How many years of that before they find that replacing leaky boots or hunting clothes or buying more ammo or a new gun, etc. (all expenses that crop up beyond the cost of a license) is just not worth the walk in the woods?




duncsdad -> RE: 2007/2008 deer harvest (4/6/2008 11:27:09 AM)

dpms wrote:

Blame the demise of the farm for the lack of pheasants.  Grouse numbers are cyclical and they are down for sure.  Kids will hunt if mom or dad has passion for the sport and doesn't whine about years past.
 
I have to disagree with 2 of these 3 statements.

"Blame the demise of the farm for the lack of pheasants" and "Kids will hunt if mom or dad has a passion for the sport and doesn't whine about years past."

The farm has nothing to do with the vast majority of pheasants in PA.  Pheasant hunting in PA is much like trout fishing in PA, with rare exception, it is a put-and-take affair.  Pheasant hunting declined because in the late 70's/early 80;s PA stocked 1 million pheasants and in 2007 PA stocked 100,000 pheasants -- a 90% decline.  The underlying reason behind the decline is money, of course.  With out a license increase for years, something had to be cut.  The only thing that PA stocks en mass is pheasants, so that is where the cuts came.

And with the upsurge of preserves and clubs, the PGC doesn't care -- most hunters buy a license for deer and as long as that continues, they have a job.

As for the kids issue, I must again disagree.  The youth hunts, especially for pheasants, were designed to give young hunters a opportunity.  It has, in at least my experience, been an utter failure.  Don't get me wrong, I like the program, but it hasn't worked.

The plant I work in has about 500 employees.  I have offered every year to volunteer to take anyone's kids pheasant hunting with me for the youth hunt.  The first year I got 4 kids.  The next year 2. And so on until this year I got a brother and sister and if it weren't for their father basically begging them to go, they wouldn't have gone.

Now we live in rural area.  Hunting and fishing are the passion of these parents, yet their kids have no interest in going pheasant hunting in easy terrain, over champion birddogs, with birds stocked just for them, for half a day.

Of course, the PGC has stocked few birds for the youth hunt as well and most articles that are in the newspapers are about hunts that took place on private club or preserve grounds -- no over PGC birds.

If these kids don't want to hunt under those circumstance with the parents that they have, it becomes a long row to hoe to get other kids interested and keep them interested -- especially if the only hunting they get to do is deer hunting and they not only aren't successful with respect to harvest, but don't see very many deer to at least keep their interest.

And forget getting any number of kids that don't have a hunting heritage to go.  My nephew (18) and his buddy (16) were visiting this week from Kentucky.  They had been to the mall, movies, Hooters, golfing, etc. and were bored to tears.  I asked if they wanted to go to the shooting range and they were all enthused.  They wanted to know if I had anything fully automatic.  I said, no.  They asked if I had something semi-auto with a big clip like an AR.  I said, no.  They asked if I had any high capacity pistols.  I said, no.  I told them I had some custom rifles, some fine over/under shotguns, some revolvers, etc.  They said, no.  And went back to playing video games on their cell phones.

As for the whining part, hunters have the same right to whine about what most view as the decline in deer hunting as you do about the price of gas going up.  You had something, whether that was a lot of deer or $1.50 gas, and now you don't, through no action of your own.  That promotes whining.

The grouse population is very cyclical and is in a down turn, but that will rebound with no effort from the PGC.





SilverKype -> RE: 2007/2008 deer harvest (4/7/2008 7:43:19 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlh42581


7: Tragic accidents from deer are few and far between, lay off the booze and the smokes before you worry about that.




Right.  A friend, an All State agent, has told me deer used to account for 35-40% of accidents in northern part of the state. 





dpms -> RE: 2007/2008 deer harvest (4/7/2008 7:56:29 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: duncsdad

The farm has nothing to do with the vast majority of pheasants in PA. 



When I started hunting pheasants in the mid eighties, I hunted non-stocked wild birds on several different farms in Washington County.  Those farms are gone along with most of the habitat for the birds.

All you have to do is look to the Bobwhite Quail in Pa. for how dramtically habitat effects bird populatons.





S-10 -> RE: 2007/2008 deer harvest (4/7/2008 10:57:02 AM)

Great, I have AllState---I can hardly wait for my rates to go down.[;)] Right




SilverKype -> RE: 2007/2008 deer harvest (4/7/2008 11:34:04 AM)

How about this one.   [sm=icon_eek.gif]


http://www.ussportsmen.org/Read.cfm?ID=2262





Dream Catcher -> RE: 2007/2008 deer disappearance (4/7/2008 11:34:55 AM)

Fantasy based management, trial & error based management ???? OOPS did I say error ? OOPS On that rate cut that will surely happen..... 35-40% of accidents from deer ... Sure we all know that trick .... Probably majority was fraud . Did I say fraud ... sounds like a certain STATE agency I know. The trends are starting to make sense. $$$$ Big Timber , Big State , Big Brother , Big Insurance , Big Oil , Big Natural Gas , its all bigger than our $ contribution ..... BTW - truth is .... Greed , money , power ... roots of all who trample the resource ..




SilverKype -> RE: 2007/2008 deer harvest (4/7/2008 11:41:47 AM)

[sm=fantastisch_11.gif] whaa!!!!




S-10 -> RE: 2007/2008 deer harvest (4/7/2008 12:20:59 PM)

Really officer----I wasn't speeding----I wasn't drinking---- I didn't fall asleep-----I swerved to miss a deer.[:D] What's that, you say they wiped the deer out of the state, oh, ah, er, it must of been one of those mountain lions then[;)].




duncsdad -> RE: 2007/2008 deer harvest (4/8/2008 8:57:27 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: dpms

quote:

ORIGINAL: duncsdad

The farm has nothing to do with the vast majority of pheasants in PA. 



When I started hunting pheasants in the mid eighties, I hunted non-stocked wild birds on several different farms in Washington County.  Those farms are gone along with most of the habitat for the birds.

All you have to do is look to the Bobwhite Quail in Pa. for how dramtically habitat effects bird populatons.




I stand corrected. 

You are right, there were some wild birds (and still are)in PA before the change in farming practices that are for the most part gone, but for 99% of hunters it was stocked birds, just like the trout stocking program.

My records indicate that before the sequential stocking reduction as short as 5 years ago, those that hunted with me didn't consider it a good season unless 100 or more birds were bagged (hunting 3-4 days per week of the 4 week season).  After the first cut in allocation, that number dropped to a little over 60.  Last year, we were restricted to only 6 days of hunting because of work and the total was 7 birds.

As for the Bobwhite, it was several winters with deep snow, the protection of birds of prey instead of a bounty, and the demise in trapping that spelled the end for them.

I have planted quail for dog training and before I walk 500 yards back to the house to get the dogs, half of them are already in the clutches of a hawk.




RIZ -> RE: 2007/2008 deer harvest (4/8/2008 11:34:37 AM)

s-10

when biologists talk of DPSM they refer to the overwinter population, not the summer one.  because you can only have a desity that can survive the winter without hurting the habitat.  so the idea is if the DPSM is 12, you have 6 doe and 6 buck.  those 6 doe should have 2 fawn each, 6 doe and 6 buck.  so you shoyuld be able to get 12 deer out of that 1 squ. mi.




MuskyMastr -> RE: 2007/2008 deer harvest (4/9/2008 3:45:04 AM)

Start killing the house cats running wild and you will save half the pheasants and quail and rabbits




Bull Lifter -> RE: 2007/2008 deer harvest (4/9/2008 6:01:26 PM)

not to mention the Fox and Yodool dogs./hawks/owls/slash hmmm snake?haha lots of reason why the small game died...shame it did. hopefully it can somehow bounce back. I read somewhere a fox needs to eat i think a pound a food roughly a day?..the encyclopidia online says that amount if you serach red fox. but i was pretty amazed, that at tops 12 pound fox needs a pound a food a day. they need quite alot of mice a day. if they cant get a rabbit or a pheshant...i'd love to be a fox around the game lands when they first stalk those dumby birds talk about easy pickens....




DanesDad -> RE: 2007/2008 deer harvest (4/11/2008 7:18:57 PM)

Habitat is definitely an issue with the downfall of small game.  When I was young, farmers didn't spray between rows in cornfields and many, if not most fields had a nice thick fencerow around the edges.  Plus trapping was still popular.  There were a lot of stocked birds out there, but you were just as likely to shoot a wild one, or a holdover from the previous year.  Rabbits were everywhere.  It was nothing to shoot a half a box of shells or more.  Man, I miss those days.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]



   

0.078