FishUSA.com Forums
Forums Home Search Photo Gallery Calendar Policies Logout Old Boards FishUSA.com Tackle Shop My Profile My Forums My Subscriptions My Address Book My Inbox Member List RSS News Feed

Log In      

Possible solution to naming specific spots

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Pennsylvania Boards] >> FishErie.com Discussion Board >> Possible solution to naming specific spots Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Possible solution to naming specific spots - 11/16/2007 3:51:35 PM   
formerguide


Posts: 1002
Joined: 9/23/2002
Status: offline
Copied this from another thread- please, if anyone has some ideas, let's get them on the table. I think that the time has definitley come to put an end to naming specific spots, particulrly those on private easements.

"Spot-burning" is absolutely a problem on this site. It's not as if 1000's of people are necesarry to ruin a good, out-of-the-way spot either. Think of a typical small trib, one that doesn't get much presssure. Now, imagine the furthest upstream access point. Maybe 1 or 2 cars at most generally are seen at this spot. The fishing ins't terrifc, but few people think to fish there, and it's a nice place to go when things are crowded and your expectaions are reasonable. Now, imagine someone posts how terrific that spot was, how no one was around, solitude, blah, blah, blah... If ONLY 3 more cars per day parked there (hardly far-fetched) this fomerly out-of-the-way spot is all of a sudden crowded. The fishing suffers, the landowner gets pissed, and the trash onstream just got doubled.

What really burns a lot of people, myself included, are the posts that ask "How's the fishing at ______?" Having to drive a long distance doesn't cut it. A lot of people drive a considerable distance, and spend an inordinate amount of time getting there. People seem to continuously argue that "I don't want to waste my time at _________ if the fish aren't there yet, or if the water is no good." People seem to think that the only time to fish is when conditions are perfect.

Newsflash- the BEST time to fish is whenever you can. Even better, when conditions aren't "perfect" on your favorite stretch, find an area where the fishing is good. The more spots that you have available in your databank, the less dependent you will be based upon water conditions. The guys who catch the most fish aren't necessarily the best anglers (though they often are...) They just have the most spots to draw upon when conditions are high, or low, or warm, or too cold, etc... And, why do any of us fish in the first place? Do I like to catch fish? Of course. But it's not why I fish, or at the least, it's not ALL of why I fish.

So, here is my opinion on how spots should be monitored on this board. I've even suggested this before. It's vague enough to hide spots, and help dissipate stream traffic, but specific enough to truly help someone who needs some information.

You can mention the following:

20 Mile Creek (no specifics)
Other East-side Trib (would include all of the Mile Streams other than 20)
Walnut - Lake to Rt 5
Walnut - Upstream of Rt 5
Trout Run
Elk Creek - Lake to Rt 5
Elk Creek - Rt 5 to Rt 20
Elk Creek - Rt 20 to McKean
Crooked Creek (no specifics)
Other (any stream or area not covered by the above...)
OH - would include any and all OH streams
NY West - Any NY Erie trib
NY East - Any NY Ontario trib

You cannot-

Mention by name any spot not covered by the above, including unstocked streams, unstocked branches, and no-name streams.

Again, I feel that this is a fair way for people to give and get information, without stampeding a specific spot. So, for example, a person can say, "Fished Elk, between Rt 5 and Rt 20. Did terrific! Water was great, crowds weren't too bad- pink SS was the ticket for me!" Now, honestly, how much more information does anyone need? You know that Elk fished well somewhere a ways up from the lake, but not too far up. Now, you have several spots to try in that given area. Everyone can benefit from the info, but no one spot would be overrun.

Just like, one could say, "Fished a Mile Stream- water was OK..." That's all anyone should need. What difference does it make what specific Mile stream it was? You know it wasn't 20, so you can guage by that alone.

Anyway, just my $.02- it seems to me a fair compromise all-around...

Dan
Post #: 1
RE: Possible solution to naming specific spots - 11/16/2007 4:06:00 PM   
D-nymph

 

Posts: 2337
Joined: 9/19/2001
Status: offline
I would even go as far as to not allow the route numbers.  For Elk, Walnut, and 20 mile just - mouth, lower, middle, upper, and that's it. 
Then for all others "mile streams" or "east side", "Bay" and "trout run"


(in reply to formerguide)
Post #: 2
RE: Possible solution to naming specific spots - 11/16/2007 4:23:56 PM   
TransAmWS6

 

Posts: 719
Joined: 9/22/2005
From: West Mifflin
Status: offline
ya people worry too much about catching fish, base their success on just catching fish whether size or numbers. they think if they drive the distance to fish and dont catch fish, it was a waste, thats far from true at least to me and most of the people on this board

< Message edited by TransAmWS6 -- 11/16/2007 4:24:43 PM >

(in reply to D-nymph)
Post #: 3
RE: Possible solution to naming specific spots - 11/16/2007 4:35:32 PM   
mgolf92

 

Posts: 678
Joined: 6/6/2006
Status: offline



Sounds Good...Take it up with a Mod.



(in reply to TransAmWS6)
Post #: 4
RE: Possible solution to naming specific spots - 11/16/2007 4:44:23 PM   
Bughawk


Posts: 6111
Status: offline
Thanks formerguide.  I think this is a reasonable system.

_____________________________

pax vobiscum +

(in reply to mgolf92)
Post #: 5
RE: Possible solution to naming specific spots - 11/16/2007 4:46:17 PM   
chrisrowboat

 

Posts: 3336
Joined: 7/4/2002
From: not here
Status: offline
Sounds good to me.
D-nymph- has a point too.
But, then I also CHOOSE NOT to post fishing reports.
Chris

< Message edited by chrisrowboat -- 11/16/2007 4:48:09 PM >

(in reply to formerguide)
Post #: 6
RE: Possible solution to naming specific spots - 11/16/2007 5:03:25 PM   
justinl8688

 

Posts: 278
Joined: 12/10/2005
Status: offline
I like the idea, no spots posted. I have seen people psot about pictures and tell exactly where it is at. Hate that!

_____________________________

If it wasn't for the bad days......the Good days wouldn't be so Good.

(in reply to chrisrowboat)
Post #: 7
RE: Possible solution to naming specific spots - 11/16/2007 5:29:00 PM   
dano


Posts: 2361
Joined: 9/21/2000
Status: offline
I would dump the NY- Erie trib designation altogether.
But then that's just me .

(in reply to justinl8688)
Post #: 8
RE: Possible solution to naming specific spots - 11/16/2007 6:11:21 PM   
genieman77

 

Posts: 1656
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dano

I would dump the NY- Erie trib designation altogether.
But then that's just me .


and Ohio too!!!

personally, I'd make EVERY  small trib a "banned" word .
Honestly, I'd be happy if they did away with mentioning ANY section of ANY trib.


..L.T.A.

(in reply to dano)
Post #: 9
RE: Possible solution to naming specific spots - 11/16/2007 6:58:20 PM   
chrisrowboat

 

Posts: 3336
Joined: 7/4/2002
From: not here
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: genieman77

quote:

ORIGINAL: dano

I would dump the NY- Erie trib designation altogether.
But then that's just me .


and Ohio too!!!

personally, I'd make EVERY  small trib a "banned" word .
Honestly, I'd be happy if they did away with mentioning ANY section of ANY trib.


..L.T.A.


Isn't that what a bait/fly shop or even a fishing guide for?
Let the people who make their money on fishermen tell their customers not the whole world. It may even make some real fishermen out of the masses.
Chris

(in reply to genieman77)
Post #: 10
RE: Possible solution to naming specific spots - 11/16/2007 7:01:03 PM   
indsguiz


Posts: 2166
Joined: 3/24/2005
Status: offline
Gentlemen,     
     Count me in on the not naming any specific area. I fished Lower Elk, Walnut or the east Side works well too.

_____________________________

Illigetimi None Carburundrum

(in reply to genieman77)
Post #: 11
RE: Possible solution to naming specific spots - 11/16/2007 7:14:21 PM   
crappiefisher

 

Posts: 2327
Joined: 3/29/2005
Status: offline
  Glad I have enough fire wood for the winter.

I'm stayin warm, I know that.

(in reply to indsguiz)
Post #: 12
RE: Possible solution to naming specific spots - 11/16/2007 9:27:46 PM   
fishrmn


Posts: 1305
Joined: 10/9/2002
From: Latrobe, PA
Status: offline
Excellent idea!  Most Great Lakes forums already have this policy, where NO small streams are allowed to be mentioned. 

I would go as far to say that only these areas should be allowed to be mentioned.  No specifics what-so-ever, do that through PM's if you want.

Lower Elk Creek
Upper Elk Creek
Lower Walnut Creek
Upper Walnut Creek
Trout Run (lake)
Godfrey Run (lake)
Presq Isle Bay
Lower Twenty Mile Creek
Upper Twenty Mile Creek

Just my opinion...
-Tim

(in reply to crappiefisher)
Post #: 13
RE: Possible solution to naming specific spots - 11/16/2007 10:11:27 PM   
crappiefisher

 

Posts: 2327
Joined: 3/29/2005
Status: offline
  put some long underwear on kid.

(in reply to fishrmn)
Post #: 14
RE: Possible solution to naming specific spots - 11/16/2007 10:27:51 PM   
tippy-toe


Posts: 4460
Joined: 11/21/2005
From: under a rock
Status: online
How about just East side and West side.

Why would anyone need to say more than....."I fished the west side this morning and did well, conditions are good."

Pretty simple.

_____________________________

I have the right to remain silent.....I just don't have the ability

(in reply to crappiefisher)
Post #: 15
RE: Possible solution to naming specific spots - 11/16/2007 10:36:59 PM   
crappiefisher

 

Posts: 2327
Joined: 3/29/2005
Status: offline
  Goose down for you

(in reply to tippy-toe)
Post #: 16
RE: Possible solution to naming specific spots - 11/16/2007 10:43:07 PM   
tippy-toe


Posts: 4460
Joined: 11/21/2005
From: under a rock
Status: online
crappie, I don't understand what you are saying......

_____________________________

I have the right to remain silent.....I just don't have the ability

(in reply to crappiefisher)
Post #: 17
RE: Possible solution to naming specific spots - 11/16/2007 10:46:19 PM   
crappiefisher

 

Posts: 2327
Joined: 3/29/2005
Status: offline
  Toots,

yinzs are cold that's all.

No big deal.


(in reply to tippy-toe)
Post #: 18
RE: Possible solution to naming specific spots - 11/16/2007 10:58:55 PM   
tippy-toe


Posts: 4460
Joined: 11/21/2005
From: under a rock
Status: online
Gottcha

_____________________________

I have the right to remain silent.....I just don't have the ability

(in reply to crappiefisher)
Post #: 19
RE: Possible solution to naming specific spots - 11/16/2007 11:33:49 PM   
Livinfishin

 

Posts: 124
Joined: 9/25/2007
Status: offline
The easiest way to avoid posting specific spots is to not post reports period.  The most detail a report should contain is the creek fished and the conditons and maybe the words "upper" or "lower" for Walnut, Elk, and 20-mile.

PS, how do you change your angler status?  IE "avid" or "pro" angler.  I am definatley not a new angler as I have been fishing Erie tribs for 19 years now.

(in reply to tippy-toe)
Post #: 20
RE: Possible solution to naming specific spots - 11/16/2007 11:40:40 PM   
youngguru

 

Posts: 1002
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: crappiefisher

put some long underwear on kid.

cRapfshaR

fSharmen iss so skiNy
hee duzzant ware eny undRware duud

hee jist pullz a sok over hiss hed
an itt covArs hiss hole bodee

ha ha

cRap fshR

du yu hav eny mor beEf jerkee/

lett meee no

(in reply to crappiefisher)
Post #: 21
RE: Possible solution to naming specific spots - 11/16/2007 11:44:07 PM   
tippy-toe


Posts: 4460
Joined: 11/21/2005
From: under a rock
Status: online
For the easiest way to not post specifics........ see above post

_____________________________

I have the right to remain silent.....I just don't have the ability

(in reply to youngguru)
Post #: 22
RE: Possible solution to naming specific spots - 11/16/2007 11:47:44 PM   
genieman77

 

Posts: 1656
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Livinfishin



PS, how do you change your angler status?  IE "avid" or "pro" angler.  I am definatley not a new angler as I have been fishing Erie tribs for 19 years now.


Pretty sure it has nothing to do with angling ability, Livin'

I believe your stars increase by the amount of posts.
The "five star" duuds have been here awhile or are just prolific posters


...L.T.A.

(in reply to Livinfishin)
Post #: 23
RE: Possible solution to naming specific spots - 11/16/2007 11:54:21 PM   
T.T.

 

Posts: 3045
Status: offline
You said prolific.

(in reply to genieman77)
Post #: 24
RE: Possible solution to naming specific spots - 11/16/2007 11:57:29 PM   
tippy-toe


Posts: 4460
Joined: 11/21/2005
From: under a rock
Status: online
TT, thats not the same as prophylactic

_____________________________

I have the right to remain silent.....I just don't have the ability

(in reply to T.T.)
Post #: 25
RE: Possible solution to naming specific spots - 11/17/2007 12:17:54 AM   
jeeters

 

Posts: 47
Joined: 12/19/2003
Status: offline
i think they should do away with the braging posts on this website,theres very few if any vetern steelheaders who post reports its just newbies and people who have to thomp their chests.

(in reply to formerguide)
Post #: 26
RE: Possible solution to naming specific spots - 11/17/2007 12:28:59 AM   
youngguru

 

Posts: 1002
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tippy-toe

TT, thats not the same as prophylactic


i bEtt krylar duzzant no wat that iss

(in reply to tippy-toe)
Post #: 27
RE: Possible solution to naming specific spots - 11/17/2007 6:12:29 AM   
bingsbaits


Posts: 1026
Joined: 3/1/2007
From: spartansburg,pa
Status: offline
Mabee someone can go over to the Post Gazette. They have caused more damage on the tribs with their bullshit articles than this board ever has.

_____________________________

......"Don't Piss down my back and tell me its raining!"....

(in reply to youngguru)
Post #: 28
RE: Possible solution to naming specific spots - 11/17/2007 9:23:11 AM   
Loomis


Posts: 641
Joined: 9/19/2005
Status: offline
Guru, Kyler just had a kid, so no he probably doesnt know what those are.  Way to be obzervent

(in reply to youngguru)
Post #: 29
RE: Possible solution to naming specific spots - 11/17/2007 11:26:29 AM   
PeteM

 

Posts: 307
Joined: 11/1/2007
From: Bethel Park
Status: offline
I disagree completely. What are these boards for? Is it to keep information private, let people know that you fish, but not where, when, why, or how?

That would be a ball. Here's a sample conversation-

Fisher1- "You like fishin'?".

Fisher2- "Yup."

Fisher1- "Okeydokey, glad we got that cleared up."

End thread.

To the contrary, I've recieved some good info on these boards in the short time that I've been here. It's kind of nice to get a few tips on whats working and where. It also seems to foster a good attitude of comaraderie in the sport.

As proof of this I would point to the Peter Creek 2007 reports thread, found here-http://forums.fishusa.com/Peters_Creek_2007_reports/m_13966/tm.htm , in which a comminuty that I live has come together to improve conditions and have a good time.

Now, maybe it's because I'm new to the sport, but I see what is going on there as a good thing.



(in reply to Loomis)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Pennsylvania Boards] >> FishErie.com Discussion Board >> Possible solution to naming specific spots Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages              Hot Topic w/ New Messages              Locked w/ New Messages
No New Messages              Hot Topic w/o New Messages              Locked w/o New Messages


Forums Home Search Photo Gallery Calendar Policies Logout Old Boards FishUSA.com Tackle Shop My Profile My Forums My Subscriptions My Address Book My Inbox Member List RSS News Feed
   

0.156