Porktown
Posts: 3094
Joined: 9/4/2001 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: gizmos http://www.fish.state.pa.us/fishpub/summary/sumconsumption.pdf Only carp and catfish advisories in the section of Allegheny in question. I would imagine with how many registered fishermen in the area that fish the rivers, the state is going to provide as accurate information as their testing provides. I do not think they would leave off information regarding public safety. Population density and the amount of law offices in the area, would likely make me add more "borderline" fish if I worked in the PFBC consumption advisory office. Although, I avoid fishing the rivers for at least 2-3 days after a heavy rain. And knowing that fish swim around in that water, they are likely going to get some sort of bacteria or viral contamination at times. These are only bad for your, if you undercook the fish. I'm not willing to take that chance myself. I have eaten a few fish from the rivers in the past, and have never gotten sick. I have noticed that most fishe take on the flavor of the water they come from, which has further kept me from keeping any river fish. If you are safe about preperation and cooking, and don't mind a bit of a river taste to them. I'd be willing to bet a paycheck they are as safe or safer than Lake Erie walleye. The rivers do get flushed out constantly. The Allegheny is north of most of the metro area's population (waste outflow), and up river of most of the old industry. Compare that to a lake with a relatively slow flushing, and 3 major metro areas (including Detroit, but not the other G. Lake's cities that dump hazards into), 20+ smaller metro areas, 100+ towns, that have sewage overflows that all flow in the direction of the lake. Not to mention all of the industrial contaminents. It's a much bigger body of water, and seems much cleaner, but those contaminents work their way up the food chain.
|