|
joebaker79 -> RE: Espn article on Pirates record performance (9/11/2008 10:21:48 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Porktown quote:
ORIGINAL: flyfishermanPA Also no one should say oh well they're not good because of their payroll. Look at the Devil Rays, must I say more? and then look at the Yankees.. ughh [:@] Please. Put the top 10 teams in a line up and the bottom 10. I'd bet that would prove well to your theory... The Devil Rays, Marlins, Indians, Brewers and a few other smaller market, low payroll teams have a much more fan friendly approach to the business. They suck for a few years, build a team that is competative for a few seasons, then lose their top guys to the Red Sox, Yankees, or whoever wants to throw their cash at them. They are willing to take a profit hit every few years to do so. The Pirates owners aren't willing to take the hit. The profit sharing, and getting money during many deals, makes them the best run smaller market MLB business. Put in a salary cap, and they'd be in the playoffs within 2-3 years. PT, do your homework. The Indians are no small market low payroll team. They've been in the top 15 for payrolls for most of the last 15 years. Check out their salaries this year even. Yes they may only finish 500, but have had tons of injuries and are coming off an ALCS year and may be headed to another one. They are committed to winning and committed to spending money to win, something the Pirates and others in similar markets refuse to do.
|
|
|
|