FishUSA.com Forums
Forums Home Search Photo Gallery Calendar Policies Logout Old Boards FishUSA.com Tackle Shop My Profile My Forums My Subscriptions My Address Book My Inbox Member List RSS News Feed

Log In      

RE: Here's Palin....

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Pennsylvania Boards] >> Off Topic Discussions - Pennsylvania >> RE: Here's Palin.... Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Here's Palin.... - 9/8/2008 5:42:56 PM   
chauncy

 

Posts: 1183
Joined: 2/3/2002
Status: offline
Didn't mean to start all this mess. I posted the picture as a joke, not to dis-respect the nation. Didn't anyone see the smiley face?

(in reply to chauncy)
Post #: 31
RE: Here's Palin.... - 9/8/2008 5:46:40 PM   
gobyking

 

Posts: 912
Status: offline
I liked it and though it would be a discussion of who would hit it or not. Obviously Tippy wouldn't, that explains why he likes the Flyers.

(in reply to chauncy)
Post #: 32
RE: Here's Palin.... - 9/8/2008 6:29:36 PM   
doubletaper


Posts: 1022
Joined: 10/15/2007
From: clarion, pa
Status: offline
From what I have heard is that she has had limited experience governing a small town and a large state from a land mass consideration, but small in population and not nearly as diverse as say New York, California, Florida, Illinois or Texas.  I would say given her rather limited backwoods experience....
The bottom line for me is we need a person who has the sensitivity and sophistication to understand the diverse world we live in and not someone who is an ideologically driven neophyte from the backwoods of Alaska......
I honestly believe her radical pro-life agenda, coupled with her very conservative gun rights and Evangelical Christian beliefs were..... quotes from bughawk

oh no, the old stereotyping a backwoods alaskan!
i can see her now, cooking moose burgers hunched over in the igloo with a rifle over her shoulder. A picture of "the last supper" hanging on the wall behind the wooden table. An antler-lit chandelier lites the one room adobe. 3 children playing just waiting to see their union commercial fisherman father to come home for dinner after a five day fishing trip out on the Bering Sea.
Her two eldest daughters outside beating the moose skin, hanging on a lodge pole, to dislodge the dirt and snow from it's hide.

just fun'n with you bughawk


_____________________________

beer and whiskey makes me frisky
but it's fly rods and trout streams that excite me

it's not luck
if success is consistent

(in reply to Bughawk)
Post #: 33
RE: Here's Palin.... - 9/8/2008 6:50:52 PM   
*commander*


Posts: 1645
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: chauncy

Didn't mean to start all this mess. I posted the picture as a joke, not to dis-respect the nation. Didn't anyone see the smiley face?



nothing wrong with that picture.

(in reply to chauncy)
Post #: 34
RE: Here's Palin.... - 9/8/2008 8:27:16 PM   
tippy-toe


Posts: 4336
Joined: 11/21/2005
From: under a rock
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: gobyking

I liked it and though it would be a discussion of who would hit it or not. Obviously Tippy wouldn't, that explains why he likes the Flyers.


I'd hit it, but I'd be wearing one of these..



_____________________________

I have the right to remain silent.....I just don't have the ability

(in reply to gobyking)
Post #: 35
RE: Here's Palin.... - 9/8/2008 8:46:11 PM   
Rapscallion

 

Posts: 219
Joined: 5/24/2008
Status: offline
You mean they would call JC those things? I always thought he was a conservative.
quote:

ORIGINAL: spoonchucker

"Jesus Christ could be the Republican choice for VP and people like Salt would find fault with him."

And Republicans, as well as many on this board, would call him a no good, dirty rotten liberal. With sociallistic, marxist, communist, lenninist tendencies. 

(in reply to spoonchucker)
Post #: 36
RE: Here's Palin.... - 9/8/2008 8:50:49 PM   
Fishtamer

 

Posts: 109
Joined: 1/21/2007
Status: offline
Bughawk, you say we are voting for a president to run our country & you don't think Palin is up to the task. The last I checked, she wasn't running for president, McCain is & he is definately the most qualified to do the job.

(in reply to tippy-toe)
Post #: 37
RE: Here's Palin.... - 9/8/2008 8:54:39 PM   
*commander*


Posts: 1645
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tippy-toe

quote:

ORIGINAL: gobyking

I liked it and though it would be a discussion of who would hit it or not. Obviously Tippy wouldn't, that explains why he likes the Flyers.


I'd hit it, but I'd be wearing one of these..





she'd have already "double-bagged" you before you ever had a chance to get it open.

(in reply to tippy-toe)
Post #: 38
RE: Here's Palin.... - 9/8/2008 9:11:58 PM   
jon_e_si

 

Posts: 339
Joined: 5/4/2006
Status: offline
Good post Chauncy - helps stimulate the juices and thought processes we all need!

(in reply to chauncy)
Post #: 39
RE: Here's Palin.... - 9/8/2008 9:19:22 PM   
S-10

 

Posts: 1532
Joined: 1/21/2005
Status: offline
Can't be ALL about the votes. Clinton would have brought more votes to Obama, than Biden


Clinton would have brought more womans votes but Obama was getting hit hard on his lack of foreign relations experience (including hit hard by Biden) and would have lost the middle which both parties need to win. His pick of Biden was to get those votes. It's nothing new but has been going on forever.

(in reply to spoonchucker)
Post #: 40
RE: Here's Palin.... - 9/9/2008 5:44:32 AM   
jon_e_si

 

Posts: 339
Joined: 5/4/2006
Status: offline
Also, Obama did not want Hillary, four years later, saying pick me, I can do it better!

(in reply to S-10)
Post #: 41
RE: Here's Palin.... - 9/9/2008 6:22:23 AM   
peacymike

 

Posts: 1285
Joined: 11/1/2004
Status: online
what the hell do you know sweet lips

(in reply to *commander*)
Post #: 42
RE: Here's Palin.... - 9/9/2008 6:58:57 AM   
BASS ACKWARDS


Posts: 85
Joined: 1/28/2008
Status: offline
I think that's the problem....Nobody knows much about her. There is always someone around to speculate who she is and what she "might" have done, but other than a couple articles from un-credible sources (both sides - both party's), no one really knows. If nobody from the "actual news media" is following these (possibly fictitious) story's, is it really worth debating ? If they are trying to find out anything and everything about her, would they have not found this stuff out and pressed the issue ? I think we will find out a lot about Sara Palin with in the coming weeks.
So, what have we all learned about Sara Palin so far -

1) She's freakin' hot !
2) Built pretty well up top !
3) She likes to fish, might even smell like fish - Who knows ? (This would be what I would have asked her Hubby). Anyone else ever catch a creek chub, smell their hand and smile ear to ear ?
4) Moose hunter and likes rifles! A woman after my own heart.
5) A little junk in the trunk. Or possibly a "Moose in her caboose".
6) Did I mention she's freakin' hot !


...........If I had to look at one of the candidates for the next 4 years, I think everyone knows who I would pick. Here's my new slogan -

To hell with McCain, I want Palin !

(in reply to peacymike)
Post #: 43
RE: Here's Palin.... - 9/9/2008 9:00:35 AM   
Bughawk


Posts: 5912
Status: offline
What Bass mentioned is true and perhaps I jumped the gun a bit by hitting on some of the hot button words used to describe Palin, but that is exactly my point.  She was brought out with just enough info and with the right adjectives associated with her like Evangelical, Pro-life, NRA member, conservative that would define her.  It seemed to work.  From the commentaries that I have heard in the press such as "the green light is on for the ultra conservatives", "they finally have someone they can vote for", "a candidate they we can get behind", say to me the tactic worked.  It also worked on me as well. 

For some those handful of adjectives spoke volumes as to her qualifications, they said just the opposite to me.  I have had experience with people before, not all but quite a few that have used those same words to describe their political views and I had major disagreements with them and when I explained my positions, more often than not got the attitude that if I was not with them, I was against them because anything other than what they believed was wrong.  The intolerance of my views and the lack of acceptance of a different opinion is what I find offensive.  I really don't mind living with people who do not agree with me, but I don't appreciate being told I am the enemy and people like me should have no say in the governance of the country.  I will work with anyone to come up with a compromise where we all have a say and all can find something we can live with, but my experience is that is not acceptable to some people. 

In all fairness I have the same problems listed above with people who are ultra-liberal, animal rights proponents, vegetarian tofu eating, abortion promoting, new age nut jobs.  The intolerance on their part is equally offensive and equally distasteful to me. 

What I am saying here is I jumped at the adjectives used to describe Palin just as did most people.  My reaction was negative because of my experiences and for others it was positive.  What kind of VP she will make, no one knows until if and when she takes that office.  But the reality is the spin doctors got exactly what they wanted and we all, myself included, took the bait.  In modern politics a few words that get associated with a person define them for good or for ill and judgments are made.  Perhaps I was to quick to judge.  Time will tell.

For the record I want to say the following:

1) I am a Christian, an Anglican and believe Christianity is a far more diverse religion than the narrow interpretations of any one denomination or group of individuals.  I support and respect all Christians and people of faith who are not Christian.  All I ask is the same of others and not to be told I am wrong because I don't hold all their beliefs.

2) I am pro-life.  If you are a Christian there is no other option in my opinion, but I also believe that we do not honestly know exactly when human life begins and I do not believe I have the right to tell another person they cannot have an abortion.  To be absolutely clear about this I do not believe abortions are an option for birth control and should be an extremely rare thing and only happen in circumstances where the life of the mother is at risk.    As far as pro-life goes, I do not believe in the death penalty for any reason.  I am against war for any reason except as the absolute last ditch effort to defend the country and then should be limited to doing that which is necessary for defense.

3) I am not, nor have I ever been a member of the NRA nor will I be.  I support the right to own arms and I have no problems with reasonable gun control laws.  My position on guns is that they are for recreational use only, ie. hunting and shooting sports.  I am not opposed to people carrying guns for self defense, but I would not do so.  See above concerning pro-life.  There are other methods of personal defense besides guns.

4) I hunt, fish and generally enjoy being in the outdoors.  I have never been to Alaska, but hope to go some day.  I think there is nothing better than connecting with nature and being immersed in it. 

I realize my views and opinions are not the same as many of those on this board.  I can live with that and I hope you can too.  As an American it is not only my right to have my opinion, but also to express them as it is yours.  All I ask is that when we do so, we try and show respect for each other.  We may not agree, but we all are still members of this country and that bond should be what holds us together.  If my opinions have offended anyone, I apologize for that.

< Message edited by Bughawk -- 9/9/2008 9:02:45 AM >


_____________________________

pax vobiscum +

(in reply to BASS ACKWARDS)
Post #: 44
RE: Here's Palin.... - 9/9/2008 9:15:40 AM   
S-10

 

Posts: 1532
Joined: 1/21/2005
Status: offline
Bug---What is your opinion concerning Obamas qualifications for the #1 job and the adjectives used to describe him?

(in reply to Bughawk)
Post #: 45
RE: Here's Palin.... - 9/9/2008 9:17:22 AM   
saltflyfisher

 

Posts: 1045
Joined: 8/14/2003
Status: offline
I was out all day yesterday, and just got a time frame to respond to the question of who printed that cut and paste I printed in the beginning. I did not notice that the writer of the article had got cut off, and I tried to go back and find. But, needless to say I can't find where I got the article again.

(in reply to Bughawk)
Post #: 46
RE: Here's Palin.... - 9/9/2008 9:44:50 AM   
LDD

 

Posts: 1001
Joined: 5/20/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bughawk

What Bass mentioned is true and perhaps I jumped the gun a bit by hitting on some of the hot button words used to describe Palin, but that is exactly my point.  She was brought out with just enough info and with the right adjectives associated with her like Evangelical, Pro-life, NRA member, conservative that would define her.  It seemed to work.  From the commentaries that I have heard in the press such as "the green light is on for the ultra conservatives", "they finally have someone they can vote for", "a candidate they we can get behind", say to me the tactic worked.  It also worked on me as well. 

For some those handful of adjectives spoke volumes as to her qualifications, they said just the opposite to me.  I have had experience with people before, not all but quite a few that have used those same words to describe their political views and I had major disagreements with them and when I explained my positions, more often than not got the attitude that if I was not with them, I was against them because anything other than what they believed was wrong.  The intolerance of my views and the lack of acceptance of a different opinion is what I find offensive.  I really don't mind living with people who do not agree with me, but I don't appreciate being told I am the enemy and people like me should have no say in the governance of the country.  I will work with anyone to come up with a compromise where we all have a say and all can find something we can live with, but my experience is that is not acceptable to some people. 

In all fairness I have the same problems listed above with people who are ultra-liberal, animal rights proponents, vegetarian tofu eating, abortion promoting, new age nut jobs.  The intolerance on their part is equally offensive and equally distasteful to me. 

What I am saying here is I jumped at the adjectives used to describe Palin just as did most people.  My reaction was negative because of my experiences and for others it was positive.  What kind of VP she will make, no one knows until if and when she takes that office.  But the reality is the spin doctors got exactly what they wanted and we all, myself included, took the bait.  In modern politics a few words that get associated with a person define them for good or for ill and judgments are made.  Perhaps I was to quick to judge.  Time will tell.

For the record I want to say the following:

1) I am a Christian, an Anglican and believe Christianity is a far more diverse religion than the narrow interpretations of any one denomination or group of individuals.  I support and respect all Christians and people of faith who are not Christian.  All I ask is the same of others and not to be told I am wrong because I don't hold all their beliefs.

2) I am pro-life.  If you are a Christian there is no other option in my opinion, but I also believe that we do not honestly know exactly when human life begins and I do not believe I have the right to tell another person they cannot have an abortion.  To be absolutely clear about this I do not believe abortions are an option for birth control and should be an extremely rare thing and only happen in circumstances where the life of the mother is at risk.    As far as pro-life goes, I do not believe in the death penalty for any reason.  I am against war for any reason except as the absolute last ditch effort to defend the country and then should be limited to doing that which is necessary for defense.

3) I am not, nor have I ever been a member of the NRA nor will I be.  I support the right to own arms and I have no problems with reasonable gun control laws.  My position on guns is that they are for recreational use only, ie. hunting and shooting sports.  I am not opposed to people carrying guns for self defense, but I would not do so.  See above concerning pro-life.  There are other methods of personal defense besides guns.

4) I hunt, fish and generally enjoy being in the outdoors.  I have never been to Alaska, but hope to go some day.  I think there is nothing better than connecting with nature and being immersed in it. 

I realize my views and opinions are not the same as many of those on this board.  I can live with that and I hope you can too.  As an American it is not only my right to have my opinion, but also to express them as it is yours.  All I ask is that when we do so, we try and show respect for each other.  We may not agree, but we all are still members of this country and that bond should be what holds us together.  If my opinions have offended anyone, I apologize for that.


Excellent points Bug.  The conservatives want to think about Palin right now because she aligns herself with their beliefs.  That's fine.  What they don't want to think about is McCain if he wins returning to the same old maverick ways and following his true beliefs and THE WILL OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.  Palin will essentially be what a VP is...not much.  She's no Cheney and I doubt she will heavily influence any policy or serious decision making.  Conservatives don't want to think about that. They want to think about a Moose Huntin chick...awww yeah.

(in reply to Bughawk)
Post #: 47
RE: Here's Palin.... - 9/9/2008 10:15:26 AM   
Bughawk


Posts: 5912
Status: offline
LDD,

A couple of years ago I was a supporter of John McCain when he was the loose canon and working both sides of the aisle.  What turned me off was when he started to move way right to appease the fringe of his party.  I understand why he did it and agree that if he gets elected, he will most likely be the conservatives worst nightmare. 

Also, if he had picked someone more moderate like Tom Ridge, I honestly think I would have considered voting for him because I knew that if something happened to him in office, the next in line was a person who while I did not agree with all of his policies, I could trust with the country.  With Palin sitting in the VP office, a heartbeat away from being president, I have some serious reservations and the likelihood of voting for McCain has waned.

For the record, Obama has done pretty much the same thing as McCain in his campaign; moving to the left to pick up votes and then back to a more central position.  The reality of politics is you have to promise everyone everything and then when elected deal with the issues that come up the way to you feel is most appropriate.

There is an old saying, "How do you know if a politician is lying?  Look and see if his lips are moving."

It is going to be an interesting 8 weeks.  Let the games begin...

< Message edited by Bughawk -- 9/9/2008 10:17:29 AM >


_____________________________

pax vobiscum +

(in reply to LDD)
Post #: 48
RE: Here's Palin.... - 9/9/2008 10:57:33 AM   
BASS ACKWARDS


Posts: 85
Joined: 1/28/2008
Status: offline
SHE'S NO CHENEY ? LMAO. They only thing he has done noteworthy is shoot someone ! I don't think he has done anything but screw up basic decision making. It amazes me you can say (and I quote) " Palin will essentially be what a VP is...not much", yet in the same post make reference to Cheney being actively involved. Which is it?  Do all VP's do nothing with the exception of Cheney ? As a Conservative, I do think about that. I have watched Ol' Dick sit and do nothing for a long time, that's why I think it's time to put someone with a little personality in the VP position. I do have to agree with you somewhat on the comment about what VP's essentially do, Nothing. Maybe it's time for a change ? Do you not think we can actually get a VP that might do something useful ? Who can say at this point that she is or is not capable of actually accomplishing something. Everything we know about her has come from either "left wing extremest" or from Sara Palin herself. I think the next few weeks will bring a little more info about all the candidates to the table. It's going to get exciting !

(in reply to LDD)
Post #: 49
RE: Here's Palin.... - 9/9/2008 11:28:57 AM   
doubletaper


Posts: 1022
Joined: 10/15/2007
From: clarion, pa
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: S-10

Bug---What is your opinion concerning Obamas qualifications for the #1 job and the adjectives used to describe him?


i'm waiting for this reply also!

bug, you took a good look and considered many angles why palin doesn't have the qualification you see fit. you must have some opinions on obama's past performance to cnvince you otherwise. i'de like to hear them. there's an old saying
"talk is cheap"

_____________________________

beer and whiskey makes me frisky
but it's fly rods and trout streams that excite me

it's not luck
if success is consistent

(in reply to S-10)
Post #: 50
RE: Here's Palin.... - 9/9/2008 11:30:33 AM   
LDD

 

Posts: 1001
Joined: 5/20/2004
Status: offline
Dick Cheney has changed the role of the Vice Presidency.  Behind the scenes Cheney and his lawyer David Addington have had more control over the whitehouse in the last eight years than any other vice pres. in history. I'll stand by that comment. Look into it.  Cheney has been involved in every major policy decision and has been instrumental in decision making process and logistics concerning both wars.  The power struggle between the VP's office and the Justice Dept. is something that will go down in history as is the power struggle between the Pentagon and the CIA over control of intelligence.  Dick Cheney is very involved and my point is that he has redefined the role of the VP.  Palin is no Cheney.

My comment indicated that Sarah Palin will in no way exert the presence in the whitehouse that Dick Cheney has. If McCain wins then Palin's mission will be to stump for more US energy extraction.  Beyond that, what else is she qualified to do...give birthing/lamase classes? This, of course, is my opinion of what will happen knowing McCain's political history and the fact that he doesn't really have much in common with her. 

(in reply to BASS ACKWARDS)
Post #: 51
RE: Here's Palin.... - 9/9/2008 11:40:57 AM   
S-10

 

Posts: 1532
Joined: 1/21/2005
Status: offline
I would agree that Cheney has been the exception rather than the rule as to the power of a Vice President although I believe in recent years there has been a gradual increase in their duties. Going forward I can't see  V.P having as much power as Cheney unless Obama gets elected in which case you will have the same situation where the V.P has more knowledge and contacts than the President. Based on a history of one that isn't necessarly a good thing.

(in reply to LDD)
Post #: 52
RE: Here's Palin.... - 9/9/2008 11:55:03 AM   
Bughawk


Posts: 5912
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: doubletaper

quote:

ORIGINAL: S-10

Bug---What is your opinion concerning Obamas qualifications for the #1 job and the adjectives used to describe him?


i'm waiting for this reply also!



bug, you took a good look and considered many angles why palin doesn't have the qualification you see fit. you must have some opinions on obama's past performance to cnvince you otherwise. i'de like to hear them. there's an old saying
"talk is cheap"


I am not a fan of Obama.  The one thing that is going for him is that he has been a senator and has worked in a more diverse environment.  I have listened to some of his message and he seems to be a intelligent and thoughtful person.  Beyond that, I have little else to say. 

I am waiting for the debates.  I want to see how these guys perform. 

BTW - the point of this thread was to discuss Palin, not Obama.

< Message edited by Bughawk -- 9/9/2008 11:56:00 AM >


_____________________________

pax vobiscum +

(in reply to doubletaper)
Post #: 53
RE: Here's Palin.... - 9/9/2008 12:31:54 PM   
BASS ACKWARDS


Posts: 85
Joined: 1/28/2008
Status: offline
I can sum up what Cheney has done very quickly. I do agree that he is one of the more publicized VP's , But is always controversial (not a completely bad thing). The foreign intelligence surveillance act....... A very important policy to protect us. He was involved in the making of the police, but his foreign intelligence experts wrote the act. He just signed it. The presidential records act......sounds like he was trying to cover someones a$$ with this one. The freedom information act.....again, foreign intelligence committee. War powers resolution......OK, he was the man on this one, but did this not just give more power to the military to not deal with consequences to wrong acts.
I remember a while back, Condoleazza Rice was attempting to compromise with North Korea about having the capability to produce nuclear technology. Ol' Dick came along and tried to put the kabosh to this. Luckily for the USA , congress stepped in and began to make relations (not that I like Rice either).
What about the 2 times he has had impeachment brought up against him ? I believe once for CIA leaks and once for waterboarding. What about ol' "scooter" Libby ? Looks like he was Cheneys fall man because of Valerie Plame identity leak. He was indited and not the Cheney staff, even after they had documents to prove Cheney authorized the leak.
He said a while back that " I will never use my VP status to write a book for my own profit" , well - He's "entertaining" it now (but only for historical purposes).
Being an active part of the presidency does not mean that the policies or acts authorized by him actually had anything to do with him. It's easy to sign your name and take the credit. I look at it like this - Everyone knows who Micheal Jackson is, not that he has ever done any good in the world, just on TV a lot. Just like Cheney.......

(in reply to Bughawk)
Post #: 54
RE: Here's Palin.... - 9/9/2008 1:59:47 PM   
LDD

 

Posts: 1001
Joined: 5/20/2004
Status: offline
Oh c'mon BASSACK, if you know that much about Cheney you surely know how involved he was in micromanaging the policies of whitehouse, especially in the run up to Iraq, the media blitz, the connections to Rumsfeld and the Pentagon.  His involvement goes far beyond a couple of bills to be signed and passed on.   Cheney redefined the Vice Presidentship. 

(in reply to BASS ACKWARDS)
Post #: 55
RE: Here's Palin.... - 9/9/2008 2:02:57 PM   
BASS ACKWARDS


Posts: 85
Joined: 1/28/2008
Status: offline
Oh boy, this is a fun post. Keeps everyone on their feet and thinking. Here's another fact about Cheney, good one too ! He supported the Vietnam war immensely. Thought that there was probable and necessary cause to get involved in one of the most deadly wars in modern US history. He still supports and defends the actions taken in that war. Did he serve ? He was drafted, did he get on the plane to Vietnam like the rest of soldiers and take a chance of not coming back ? NOPE ! He files for military deferment during his time of being called to defend America. When asked later why he did not serve, his reply was "I had other priority's in the 60's than the military". Look all you want - That's a quote strait from his mouth. So, Does this not make him a draft dodger ? Is it OK just because his family was involved in politics and he had money to file , and be granted, a deferment while he attended college ? Is that OK for you to have to leave your family to go to war and for him to say " nah, I don't want to. I think I'll just go to college instead". To me, he's a coward. Hands down. Not going to change my mind. I have followed Ol' Dick for a long time and being that he is now  "big man on campus", it seems to steer peoples opinions of where he came from and what he actually is. Sorry, but a big man would have went to war, not college. How many veterans out there were given the option of college or war. I don't think you will find another out there that was given that option. The only decision those brave men are given is life or death ! Now he is in a political position making wartime decisions .What does he know, other than what he has been advised by people that had the balls to serve, about real war.......Kind of like giving a 3 year old the keys to your new car.

(in reply to BASS ACKWARDS)
Post #: 56
RE: Here's Palin.... - 9/9/2008 2:32:20 PM   
BASS ACKWARDS


Posts: 85
Joined: 1/28/2008
Status: offline
You know, I have been sitting here thinking. I know - I know, not good. What had Cheney done useful - or by himself (without his little advisory team) ? I know what! Pick me, pick me ! Strait from the mouth of the most powerful and best VP ever (Hint- Note the sarcasm. HEHE) - He said a while back......."Everybody brings a different set of experiences to the office and also has a different kind of understanding with whoever the president is. Each administration is different. And there's no reason why Sarah Palin can't be a successful vice president in a McCain administration". END QUOTE..........I guess he does know at least one thing.

(in reply to BASS ACKWARDS)
Post #: 57
RE: Here's Palin.... - 9/9/2008 3:18:39 PM   
jackq

 

Posts: 193
Joined: 3/31/2008
From: Altoona/Newville, PA.
Status: online
CNN
ANCHORAGE, Alaska (CNN) -- While Democrats have questioned her budget priorities, some Alaskans see Gov. Sarah Palin as a modern-day Robin Hood who has slashed government spending and given money to the people.




Gov. Sarah Palin presents herself as a champion in the fight against earmarks like Sen. John McCain. "She has helped to balance our budget. She has done a very good job," Alaskan Kim Brink said of the GOP vice presidential nominee. "She gave, she fought to get us a little bit of extra money in these hard economic times."
On the campaign trail, Palin is selling herself as a fiscal Rambo, telling crowds, "Our state budget is under control. We have a surplus, and I have protected the taxpayers by vetoing wasteful spending."
However, a look at her state's balance sheets shows that spending has gone up during Palin's year and a half tenure as governor.
Still, Alaska is running a big budget surplus. The Alaska government has put $5 billion into savings over the last two years, mainly because a new tax on oil companies that Palin supported has driven money into state coffers. Watch a look at Palin's fiscal priorities »
Palin did give each citizen some of the money from that oil tax -- each man, woman and child gets an extra $1,200 check from the state this year.
Palin also has presented herself -- like her running mate, Sen. John McCain -- as a champion in the fight against earmarks, the special projects politicians fund by adding a line or two to legislation.

Don't Miss

Men give Palin edge in poll
Pastor: GOP downplaying Palin's faith
Palin shoves Biden out of the spotlight "I told the Congress, 'Thanks, but no thanks,' on that 'Bridge to Nowhere,' " Palin said during her acceptance speech last week at the Republican National Convention, referring to a $223 million earmark requested by Republican Sen. Ted Stevens for a bridge to Gravina Island, population 50.
"If our state wanted to build a bridge, we were going to build it ourselves." Watch an ex-aide defend Palin's position on the bridge »
The line gets big applause when she repeats it on the campaign trail, but Palin was for the bridge before she became governor. After being elected, she was against it, saying the project was too expensive, but Alaska kept the more than $100 million Congress gave for the bridge.
The Associated Press also reported that Palin's government this year asked for 31 earmarks totaling $198 million, down from the $550 million in earmarks the state asked for the previous year.
As governor, Palin has used her line-item veto to cut funds for special interest programs called earmarks.



Her Democratic critics in Alaska complain she has the wrong priorities.
"For a drop in the bucket, every single kid in the state could have health insurance," said state Rep. Les Gara, a Democrat from Anchorage. "For a drop in the bucket, we don't have to be one of the worst states in terms of high school graduation rates."
E-mail to a friend









(in reply to BASS ACKWARDS)
Post #: 58
RE: Here's Palin.... - 9/9/2008 3:28:23 PM   
LDD

 

Posts: 1001
Joined: 5/20/2004
Status: offline
Yeah, don't get me wrong BASS, I'm not defending the guy.  I'm just saying he took over and redefined the office, for better or worse.  Darth Cheney wouldn't be denied!!!!!!

(in reply to BASS ACKWARDS)
Post #: 59
RE: Here's Palin.... - 9/9/2008 3:31:11 PM   
LDD

 

Posts: 1001
Joined: 5/20/2004
Status: offline
"The Alaska government has put $5 billion into savings over the last two years, mainly because a new tax on oil companies that Palin supported has driven money into state coffers. Watch a look at Palin's fiscal priorities »
Palin did give each citizen some of the money from that oil tax -- each man, woman and child gets an extra $1,200 check from the state this year."

Wow, maybe she should be running with Obama. Sounds a bit like his stance on the issue. 

(in reply to jackq)
Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Pennsylvania Boards] >> Off Topic Discussions - Pennsylvania >> RE: Here's Palin.... Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4