Why Red Oaks Don't Regenerate

Author
deerfly
Pro Angler
  • Total Posts : 1271
  • Reward points: 0
  • Joined: 2010/05/03 16:06:32
  • Status: offline
2010/06/02 18:35:54 (permalink)

Why Red Oaks Don't Regenerate

Here is a quote from a report on red oak regeneration.

"Introduction
Across the Central Hardwoods Region, stands currently dominated by oaks are becoming less common
due to regeneration failures. Long-term fire suppression and the increased mortality of oaks caused by
gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar L.) defoliation and oak wilt [Ceratocystis sogacearum (Bretz) Hunt.], have
resulted in many oak species being displaced by more shade-tolerant species (Hix and Lorimer 1991;
Abrams and Nowacki 1992; Isebrands and Dickson, 1994). Additionally, urban expansion, conversion
of mixed-oak forests to pasture and cropland, and accelerated harvesting has resulted in additional
losses of oak stands across the Region (Abrams and Nowacki 1992; Johnson, 1993). This decline is
particularly true for northern red oak (Quercus rubra L.) stands, which currently are being heavily
harvested by private landowners because of the species’ high lumber value and susceptibility to pests
such as the gypsy moth. Consequently, the establishment and restoration of northern red oak stands
are important issues facing resource managers in the Central Hardwoods Region.
Unfortunately, the silvical characteristics of northern red oak are such that it is often difficult to
successfully regenerate these stands. As an intermediate species in shade tolerance with heavy seeds
(Burns and Honkala 1990), northern red oak will not rapidly invade open areas such as old fields or
out-compete other species following harvest operations or in closed canopy conditions. Acorn
production is also often highly erratic from year to year, and predation losses due to insects, birds, and
mammals can be very high. These characteristics when coupled with fairly high moisture requirements
for early growth make northern red oak a prime candidate for restoration planting. "

Notice there is no mention of over browsing by deer.
#1

9 Replies Related Threads

    MuskyMastr
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 3032
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2005/06/30 17:39:29
    • Location: Valley of the Crazy Woman
    • Status: offline
    RE: Why Red Oaks Don't Regenerate 2010/06/02 20:25:56 (permalink)
    Another interesting fact is that the allegheny plateau historically was not a prime site for oak stands. That doesn't mean there weren't any, but they were not a dominant canopy species.

    Better too far back, than too far forward.
    #2
    DanesDad
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 3087
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2005/03/21 15:35:43
    • Status: offline
    RE: Why Red Oaks Don't Regenerate 2010/06/03 00:45:23 (permalink)
    Wasn't Chestnut the dominant species before the blight?
    #3
    spoonchucker
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 8561
    • Reward points: 0
    • Status: offline
    RE: Why Red Oaks Don't Regenerate 2010/06/03 01:09:37 (permalink)
    No oak Cialis?

    Get Informed, Get Involved, And Make A Difference.

    Step Up, or Step Aside


    The next time you say "Somebody should do something", remember that YOU are somebody.

    GL
    #4
    DarDys
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 4894
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2009/11/13 08:46:21
    • Location: Duncansville, PA
    • Status: offline
    RE: Why Red Oaks Don't Regenerate 2010/06/03 07:43:21 (permalink)
    ORIGINAL: spoonchucker

    No oak Cialis?

     
    Nope, they need more room for roots than afforded by a claw-foot bath tub.

    The poster formally known as Duncsdad

    Everything I say can be fully substantiated by my own opinion.
    #5
    bulldog1
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 5203
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2008/06/05 12:23:00
    • Status: offline
    RE: Why Red Oaks Don't Regenerate 2010/06/03 16:43:59 (permalink)

    ORIGINAL: spoonchucker

    No oak Cialis?


    I thought oak was a hard wood
    #6
    RIZ
    Expert Angler
    • Total Posts : 915
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2002/04/17 11:44:29
    • Status: offline
    RE: Why Red Oaks Don't Regenerate 2010/06/04 16:38:13 (permalink)
    pretty soft when still small  gotta grow to get to the hardwood stage
    #7
    SilverKype
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 3842
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2005/01/24 11:58:02
    • Location: State
    • Status: offline
    RE: Why Red Oaks Don't Regenerate 2010/06/10 10:25:39 (permalink)
    There are going to be a pile of akerns this year in central PA. Red oaks are loaded up and the storm the other day brought down a few white oak branches. Loaded. No rock oak id yet.

    My reports and advice are for everyone to enjoy, not just the paying customers.
    #8
    MuskyMastr
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 3032
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2005/06/30 17:39:29
    • Location: Valley of the Crazy Woman
    • Status: offline
    RE: Why Red Oaks Don't Regenerate 2010/06/10 11:43:36 (permalink)
    Cherries are droopin there are so many in McKean.....Good year for bears in the cherries.

    Better too far back, than too far forward.
    #9
    deerfly
    Pro Angler
    • Total Posts : 1271
    • Reward points: 0
    • Joined: 2010/05/03 16:06:32
    • Status: offline
    RE: Why Red Oaks Don't Regenerate 2010/06/10 16:54:14 (permalink)
    I wonder if cherries regenerate better than oaks in part because their seeds aren't destroyed when eaten by some wildlife, like acorns are? Plus they get a shot of fertilizer when they are expelled which gives them a head start.
    #10
    Jump to: